Skip to main content
Download PDF

IRF1 regulation of ZBP1 links mitochondrial DNA and chondrocyte damage in osteoarthritis

Cell Communication and Signaling volume 22, Article number: 366 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) is a nucleic acid sensor that is involved in multiple inflammatory diseases, but whether and how it contributes to osteoarthritis (OA) are unclear.

Methods

Cartilage tissues were harvested from patients with OA and a murine model of OA to evaluate ZBP1 expression. Subsequently, the functional role and mechanism of ZBP1 were examined in primary chondrocytes, and the role of ZBP1 in OA was explored in mouse models.

Results

We showed the upregulation of ZBP1 in articular cartilage originating from OA patients and mice with OA after destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery. Specifically, knockdown of ZBP1 alleviated chondrocyte damage and protected mice from DMM-induced OA. Mechanistically, tumor necrosis factor alpha induced ZBP1 overexpression in an interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1)-dependent manner and elicited the activation of ZBP1 via mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release and ZBP1 binding. The upregulated and activated ZBP1 could interact with receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 and activate the transforming growth factor-beta-activated kinase 1-NF-κB signaling pathway, which led to chondrocyte inflammation and extracellular matrix degradation. Moreover, inhibition of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis with Cyclosporine A, a blocker of mtDNA release, could delay the progression of DMM-induced OA.

Conclusions

Our data revealed the pathological role of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis in OA chondrocytes, suggesting that inhibition of this axis could be a viable therapeutic approach for OA.

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative diseases, affecting more than 500 million people worldwide [1]. The most basic pathological feature of OA is the destruction of articular cartilage [1]. Chondrocytes, the predominant cell type in articular cartilage, govern the integrity and homeostasis of cartilage [2]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying OA chondrocyte damage and OA pathogenesis are largely unknown. This gap prevents the development of effective agents to delay OA progression. Therefore, novel targets for OA treatment must be identified.

Innate immune sensing of pathogen-associated or damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs) can activate multiple intracellular signaling pathways that elicit a proinflammatory immune response [3]. In addition, many innate sensors also trigger inflammation in response to pathogens or other immunological stimuli [4].

These molecules, either from the extracellular matrix (ECM) or from dying cells, bind to pathogen-recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors and the receptor for advanced glycation end products, and activate the secretion of proinflammatory factors, leading to joint inflammation [5]. At the cellular level, these molecules could cause the chondrocyte damage including imbalanced ECM metabolism, inflammation, and death in chondrocytes [6, 7].

Recent studies have identified Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) as an innate sensor of viral infections and endogenous nucleic acid ligands such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), regulating cell death, inflammasome activation, and inflammatory responses [8,9,10]. Given the critical role of ZBP1 as a pathogen sensor and a regulator of cell death and inflammation, ZBP1 is also involved in several diseases, such as infection [11], skin inflammation [12], and inflammatory bowel disease [13]. Although PAMP- and DAMP-associated inflammation play roles in chondrocyte damage and OA progression [14, 15], whether ZBP1 contributes to the development of OA remains poorly understood.

Under physiological conditions, DNA mainly resides in the nucleus and mitochondria of cells. Damaged or stressed mtDNA can be released into the cytosol through pores formed by Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel (VDAC) oligomers or the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) [16, 17]. Numerous studies have reported that the release of mtDNA is involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases. Szczesny et al. reported that activation of the mtDNA/ZBP1 pathway by oxidative stress triggers the expression of proinflammatory markers in retinal pigment epithelial cells and contributes to the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration [18]. The mitochondrial DNA concentration in synovial fluid reflects the degree of cartilage damage [19], suggesting a close correlation between mtDNA and OA pathology.

IFN regulatory factor (IRF)1 is a transcription factor with a central role in innate and adaptive immune responses [20]. Recent studies have reported that IRF1 expression is significantly elevated after mtDNA stimulation in retinal microvascular endothelial cells [21] and that IRF1 can mediate ZBP1 transcription in trophoblast cells [22]. These findings establish correlations between mtDNA, IRF1, and ZBP1; however, the role of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis in chondrocyte damage and OA is largely unknown.

In this study, we revealed a positive correlation between ZBP1 expression and OA progression. We also identified mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1-RIPK1 as the pathological axis involved in chondrocyte damage. In addition, this study demonstrated that inhibition of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis with Cyclosporine A (CsA) protected mice from destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM)-induced OA progression.

Methods

Human samples

All OA cartilage specimens were collected from patients who underwent surgery to replace the knee joint at Tongji Hospital. The control cartilage was obtained from patients who underwent amputation surgery. The informed consent forms for cartilage specimen collection were signed by the patients and the collection of and experiments using human cartilage were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB20210905). The basic information of the amputees and the OA patients is shown in Additional file 1: Tables S1-2.

Materials and reagents

The following reagents were obtained commercially: tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-a) was obtained from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA; #554,589). IL-1β was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA; 401-ML-010). Cyclosporin A (CsA) was obtained from MedChemExpress (New Jersey, USA; HY-B0579). Fetal bovine serum was obtained from NEW-ZEALAND (New York, USA). iNOS Rabbit mAb (13,120; Western blot: 1:1000), COX2 Rabbit mAb (12,882; Western blot: 1:1000) and Phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) Rabbit mAb (3033; Western blot: 1:1000; IF:1:800) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, USA). dsDNA Mouse mAb (ab27156; Western blot: 1:1000; IF: 1:600) antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). COL2A1 Rabbit Polyclonal antibody (28459-1-AP; Western blot: 1:1000; IF: 1:200; IHC: 1:800), β-ACTIN Recombinant Rabbit antibody (81115-1-RR; Western blot: 1:10000), Phospho-RIPK1 (Ser161) Mouse Monoclonal antibody (66854-1-Ig; Western blot: 1:5000; IF: 1:400; IHC: 1:500), IRF1 Rabbit Polyclonal antibody (11335-1-AP; Western blot: 1:500; IF: 1:250), GAPDH Mouse mAb (60004-1-Ig; Western blot: 1:10000) and MMP13 Rabbit Polyclonal antibody (18165-1-AP; Western blot: 1:1000; IF: 1:200; IHC: 1:100) were acquired from Proteintech Group (Wuhan, China). The ZBP1 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody was obtained from Thermo Fisher (Massachusetts, USA, PA5-20455; Western blot: 1:1000; IF: 1:200; IHC: 1:500). MMP3 Rabbit monoclonal antibody (BM4074; Western blot: 1:1000), FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, type II collagenase, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s culture medium F12 (DMEM/F12) and trypsin were purchased from Boster (Wuhan, China). IP lysis buffer (p0013) and MitoTracker were obtained from Beyotime (Shanghai, China).

Chondrocyte isolation and culture

Primary chondrocytes were isolated from the knee joints of 5-day-old house mice. First, the cartilage was dissected into pieces in sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the cartilage slices were subsequently digested with 0.25% trypsin at 37 °C for 30 min. Then,, the cartilage was digested with 0.2% type II collagenase in DMEM for 6 h. Afterward, the cell suspension was transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 1,200-1,800 rpm at room temperature for 5 min. Primary chondrocytes were resuspended and cultured in DMEM/F12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Next, the chondrocytes were passaged in a T25 flask for culture, and the medium was changed every 2 days. Only the first or second passages of chondrocytes were used in the experiments.

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), plasmids and transfection

The negative control siRNA and siRNAs targeting ZBP1 and IRF1 were synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology. The transfection procedure was conducted as previously described [23]. After the chondrocytes had grown to 60–70% confluence on six-well plates, they were transfected with 50 nmol of the negative control small interfering RNA (siNC), ZBP1 siRNA (siZBP1 #1: CCCTCAATCAAGTCCTTTA; siZBP1 #2: GCCTGCAACATGGAGCATA; siZBP1 #3: CCTGTATTCCATGAGAAAT), or IRF1 siRNA (siIRF1 #1: CACTGATCTGTATAACCTA; siIRF1 #2: GATGGACATTATACCAGAT; siIRF1 #3: GCAGATGGACATTATACCA) using Lipofectamine 3000 in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, the chondrocytes were treated with IL-1β or TNF-α before total RNA and protein extraction. Western blot and qRT‒PCR were performed to assess the knockdown efficiency compared to that in the siNC group. The negative control plasmid and flag-tagged ZBP1 plasmid were synthesized by Aoke Biosciences.

The RHIM domain of ZBP1 was mutated and loaded in an adenovirus

Recombinant lentivirus vectors which expressing ZBP1 or ZBP1 which mutant the RHIM domain were constructed by DesignGene (Wuhan, China). Briefly, DNA fragments encoding ZBP1 or ZBP1 which mutant the RHIM domain were subcloned into the lentivirus vectors (NM_021394.2). The empty lentivirus vector was used as a negative control. Subsequently, chondrocytes were cultured in the 10 cm dish, and transfected with lentivirus when the cell density reached to about 80%. The transfect time duration was 24 h. Then, the chondrocytes were cultured useing the fresh medium for another 24 h. Finally, the chondrocytes were treated with TNF-α for 15 min. Chondrocytes were infected with lentivirus at 30 multiplicities of infection (MOI).

In vivo downregulation of ZBP1 using an adeno-associated virus

Adeno-associated virus 9 containing ZBP1 (AAV9-shZBP1) (WZ Biosciences, Inc.) was administered to eight-week-old C57BL/6J mice by intra-articular injection. The doses (10 µl, 1 × 1012 vg/ml) used for the joint injection of AAV9 were chosen according to a previous report [24]. Three weeks after the injection of adeno-associated virus into the joint cavity, destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) surgery was performed to establish the animal model. At the eighth week after surgery, the knee joints of the mice were collected for subsequent experiments. Other groups that did not require an injection of AAV9-shZBP1 were treated with a negative control (AAV9-GFP) for the same time.

Animal experiments

Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were used for the animal experiments. The in vivo study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Hospital (IACUC No.: TJH202301008). DMM surgery was conducted according to previously described instructions [25] to induce posttraumatic OA when the C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized. Mice in the control group underwent a sham operation via an incision in the medial capsule of the knee joint. Thirty-two male C57BL/6 mice were indiscriminately separated into four groups: Sham + AAV9-GFP, Sham + AAV9-shZBP1, DMM + AAV9-GFP, and DMM + AAV9-shZBP1. For knee joint capsule administration of CsA, we indiscriminately separated thirty mice into three groups: DMM + PBS, DMM + CsA (2 µg/kg), and DMM + CsA (20 µg/kg). Then, 10 µl of CsA or PBS was injected into the knee cavity once a week for seven weeks. The mice were sacrificed eight weeks after DMM or Sham surgery.

Western blot analysis

The treated chondrocytes were lysed with RIPA buffer (Biocolors Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China), and the samples were sonicated 3 times. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid method. Next, the samples were heated with loading buffer at 95 °C for 10 min. The 25 µg protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membranes. Afterward, the PVDF membranes were blocked with blocking solution (5% skim milk) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies against MMP13, MMP3, GAPDH, COL2A1, IRF1, COX2, AGGRECAN, iNOS, SOX9, ZBP1, β-actin, P65, P-P65, TAK1, P-TAK1, RIPK1, and P-RIPK1 at 4 °C. After an overnight incubation, the membranes were washed with Tris-buffered saline with Tween (TBST) four times for 7 min. The next step was to incubate the membranes with the secondary antibody, after which the membranes were washed as described above. Finally, the membranes were subjected to chemiluminescence. We selected GAPDH or β-actin as the reference. A Bio-Rad scanner was used to detect the signal strength on the membranes.

Quantitative real-time PCR

A total RNA extraction kit (Omega Biotek, R6834-01) was used to extract the RNA for qPCR. Complementary DNA was synthesized using Hifair® III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Yeasen, 11141ES60). Then, the cDNA was amplified using SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen, 11203ES03). The amplification method was described previously. Gapdh served as a reference. All mRNA expression levels were standardized to Gapdh. The primer sequences utilized in the study were Zbp1 (F) 5’-AAGAGTCCCCTGCGATTATTTG-3’ and (R) 5’-TCTGGATGGCGTTTGAATTGG-3’; Irf1 (F) 5’-ATGCCAATCACTCGAATGCG-3’, (R) 5’-TTGTATCGGCCTG TGTGAATG-3’; Inos (F) 5’-GTTCTCAGCCCAACAATAC AAGA-3’, (R) 5’-GTGGACGGGTCGATGTCAC-3’; and Gapdh (F) 5’-AGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTT CA-3’, (R) 5’-GGGTG GTCCAGGGTTTCTTA-3’. The tests were repeated 3 times.

Detection of mtDNA in cytosolic extracts

mtDNA release was assayed as described previously [25, 26]. The cell fraction was collected as described previously [26, 27]. Briefly, chondrocytes were washed with PBS, 10% of which was used to extract DNA from the entire cell. The other chondrocytes were resuspended in precooled mitochondrial extraction buffer 1 (70 mM sucrose, 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 20 mM HEPES-KOH, 220 mM mannitol, pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail and a phosphatase inhibitor. Next, the homogenized cells were centrifuged for 15 minutes (1000 × g, 4°C). The supernatant was centrifuged again at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C to pellet the mitochondria from the supernatant of the cytosolic fraction. One part was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech, China), and the extracts were used as standardization controls for total DNA. The other sample was centrifuged to obtain pure cytosolic fractions. DNA was subsequently extracted from the fractions via QIAQuick Nucleotide Removal Columns (QIAGEN, Germany). Then, the total DNA and mitochondrial DNA were amplified using qPCR. The Ct value for the mtDNA number in the whole-cell extracts was regarded as a standardization control for comparing the variation in mtDNA levels in the cytosol. The presence of TERT DNA indicated that nuclear lysis did not occur. The sequences of the primers used in this experiment are D-loop (F) 5’-AATCTACCATCCTCCGTGAAACC-3’ and (R) 5’-TCAGTTTAGCTACCCCCAAGTTTAA-3’; Loop2 (F) 5’-CCCTT CCCCATTTGGTCT-3’, (R) 5’-TGGTTTCACGGAGGATGG-3’; Loop3 (F) 5’-TCCTCCGTGAAACCAACAA − 3’, (R) 5’-AGCGAGAAGAGGGGCATT-3’; and TERT (F) 5’-CTAGCTCATGTGTCAAGACCCTCTT-3’, (R) 5’-GCCAGCACGTTTC TCTCGTT-3’.

Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay

The co-IP assay was conducted as previously reported [28]. Briefly, chondrocytes were cultured and treated with TNF-α for 15 min. Afterward, the cells were lysed in 1 mL of IP lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors. The samples were centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min after being lysed on ice for 10 min. Protein A + G magnetic beads were added to the cell lysates, which were then shaken for 1 h to eliminate nonspecific binding. Subsequently, the mixture was shaken overnight at 4 °C after being mixed with the primary antibody. Next, the samples were centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and the immune complex was washed 3 times with lysis buffer. Finally, lysis buffer and 5× loading buffer were added to the beads. After the mixture was boiled for 10 min at 97 °C, the supernatant was removed for western blot analysis.

Immunofluorescence (IF) staining

First, chondrocytes were seeded in confocal dishes, and the expression of ZBP1 or IRF1 was knocked down according to previous methods. Next, the cells were treated with or without TNF-α for a suitable time period. Then, the chondrocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, and 0.5% Triton X-100 was used to permeabilize the cell membrane. Afterward, the chondrocytes were incubated with blocking goat serum for 1 h, after which they were incubated with primary antibodies against MMP13, COL2A1, ZBP1, P-P65, P-RIPK1, and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), as well as the corresponding secondary antibodies. After the incubations, the nuclei were stained with DAPI for 3 min. Next, the cells were washed with PBST between each step. A laser scanning confocal microscope (FV3000, Olympus Corporation, Japan) was used to capture the images.

Histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses

Mouse knee joints were fixed with paraformaldehyde for 1 day. The samples were decalcified for 21 days with 10% EDTA (pH 7.4) and cut into 5-µm thick sagittal sections after they were embedded in paraffin. Next, the samples were stained with safranin O/fast green and hematoxylin–eosin (HE). The OARSI histopathology scoring system was applied in a blinded manner to evaluate cartilage degeneration. After the samples were deparaffinized and rehydrated, BSA containing 0.1% Triton X-100 was applied to block the samples for 1 h. Next, the samples were incubated with anti-COL2A1, anti-P-P65, anti-P-RIPK1, anti-MMP13 or anti-ZBP1 antibodies, incubated with the secondary antibody, and stained with DAB. Finally, hematoxylin was used to counterstain the samples. Images were obtained using a general microscope (BX53, Olympus Corporation, Japan).

Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis

First, the joints were evaluated with a Viva CT 80 scanner (Scanco Medical AG, Switzerland), and the samples were scanned at a thickness of 10.5 μm. Images of reconstructed 3-dimensional (3D) regions were obtained using built-in software. The dimensions of the tibial plateau osteophytes were detected and quantified in cross-sectional images. The analysis of subchondral bone in the medial condyle of the tibia began at the distal 10th layer of the tibial plateau superior border and ended at the 40th layer. Morphological parameters, such as the bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), the number of trabeculae (Tb.N), the trabecular space (Tb.Sp) and the thickness of the trabecula (Tb.Th), were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

The unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test was used to compare two different groups, and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test and two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for multiple comparisons. A. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). At least three biological replicates were analyzed in each experiment. The statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 9.0. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant, NS represents not significant, * indicates P < 0.05, and ** indicates P < 0.01.

Results

OA features by the altered ZBP1 expression

We first assessed the ZBP1 expression level in OA samples and a posttraumatic OA murine model to determine the relationship between ZBP1 expression and OA progression. Severe degeneration was observed in the cartilage of OA patients, and the IHC results indicated that more ZBP1-expressing chondrocytes were found in the cartilage of OA patients than in that of normal controls (Fig. 1A-C). We established a posttraumatic OA model by performing DMM surgery, and the IHC results for ZBP1 expression in the mouse joint cartilage were consistent with the results from human samples (Fig. 1D, E). Subsequently, we detected the expression of ZBP1 in vitro. The pathogenesis of OA is closely related to proinflammatory factors [29]. Therefore, we applied TNF-α to mimic pathological conditions within OA joints and found that TNF-α caused increased expression of inflammatory mediators (iNOS and COX2) and matrix-degrading enzymes (MMP3 and MMP13) while decreased matrix-synthesis markers (COL2A1 and SOX9) (Fig. 1F). The Western blot and qPCR results showed that the ZBP1 level was notably increased in chondrocytes after TNF-α treatment (Fig. 1G-I). Consistent with these results, IF staining confirmed a distinct increase in ZBP1 expression in chondrocytes treated with TNF-α (Fig. 1J, K). Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that OA induces ZBP1 overexpression.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ZBP1 expression in OA. (A, B) Safranin O/fast green and IHC staining of ZBP1 in normal cartilage and human OA cartilage (scale bar A: 200 μm, scale bar B: 400 μm). (C) Statistical analysis of ZBP1-positive chondrocytes among all chondrocytes (control group: n = 4; human OA group: n = 12). (D, E) IHC images and quantitative analysis of ZBP1-positive cells in the knee joint cartilage of mice (sham group: n = 5; DMM group: n = 5; scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Western blot analysis of the levels of the indicated proteins in chondrocytes treated with TNF-α for 0, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. (G, H) Western blot and semiquantitative analysis of ZBP1 protein expression (n = 3). (I) qPCR results showing the relative ZBP1 expression level in chondrocytes treated with TNF-α for 0, 1, 6, 12, or 24 h (n = 3). (J, K) Image of immunofluorescence staining and quantitative analysis of the fluorescence intensity showing the relative expression of ZBP1 in chondrocytes treated with TNF-α for 24 h (n = 3; scale bar: 25 μm). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

ZBP1 is required for chondrocyte inflammation and ECM degradation

We investigated the effect of ZBP1 knockdown on inflammatory chondrocytes to assess the functional relevance of ZBP1 in chondrocytes. First, the efficiency of the siRNA-mediated knockdown of ZBP1 expression was confirmed by the qPCR and Western blot results (Fig. 2A and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). The most important function of chondrocytes is to maintain ECM homeostasis via anabolism and catabolism [30]. Therefore, we further detected changes in ECM metabolism using western blotting. ZBP1 knockdown significantly restored ECM homeostasis, as shown by reduced expression levels of the catabolic markers matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP13) and metallopeptidase 3 (MMP3) and increased expression level of the anabolic marker SOX9 (Fig. 2A-D). ZBP1 knockdown also markedly decreased the expression of inflammatory markers (iNOS; Fig. 2E, F). qPCR revealed similar results (Fig. 2G). In addition, the IF analysis confirmed that ZBP1 knockdown increased the COL2A1 expression level and decreased the MMP13 expression level (Fig. 2H-K). TSZ (20 ng/ml TNF-α (T), 100 nM Smac mimetic (S), and 20 mM Z-VAD (Z)) can induce necroptosis [30, 31]; therefore, we used TSZ to induce necroptosis in chondrocytes to verify the role of ZBP1 in this process. Western blot analysis revealed that TSZ increased the expression of ZBP1 and necroptosis markers, and knockdown of ZBP1 significantly decreased the expression of necroptosis markers (Fig. 2L, M). We also treated chondrocytes with interleukin-1β (IL-1β), another classic proinflammatory factor that is commonly used in OA studies, to determine the impact of ZBP1 on inflammatory chondrocytes. The Western blot and qPCR results showed that ZBP1 knockdown also attenuated IL-1β-induced chondrocyte inflammation and ECM degradation (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A, B). Collectively, these results indicated that ZBP1 contributed to the OA-like phenotype of chondrocytes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ZBP1 is essential for chondrocyte damage. Chondrocytes were transfected with siNC or ZBP1 siRNA for 24 h following TNF-α induction for 24 h. (A, B) Western blots and quantitative analysis of ZBP1, MMP13, and MMP3 expression levels (n = 3). (C, D) Western blots and quantitative analysis of SOX9 expression levels. (E, F) Western blot and quantitative analysis of iNOS expression levels (n = 3). (G) qPCR results showing the relative expression levels of Zbp1 and Inos (n = 3). (H-K) Immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence intensity analysis of the relative expression levels of COL2A1 and MMP13 (n = 3; scale bar: 50 μm). Chondrocytes were transfected with siNC or ZBP1 siRNA following TSZ (20 ng/ml TNF-α, 100 nM Smac mimetic, and 20 mM Z-VAD) induction for 12 h. (L, M) Western blots and quantitative analysis of ZBP1, P-RIPK3, and P-MLKL expression levels (n = 3). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

ZBP1 knockdown protects mice from DMM-induced cartilage degeneration and osteophyte formation

Since ZBP1 is required for the OA-like phenotype of chondrocytes, the next key question is whether the loss of ZBP1 in chondrocytes protects mice from OA. AAV9-ZBP1 was injected into the knee cavity to downregulate ZBP1 expression in cartilage. The IHC results confirmed that AAV9-shZBP1 effectively decreased the number of ZBP1-chondrocytes compared to the AAV9-shGFP group (Fig. 3A, B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ZBP1 is essential for OA progression in DMM mice. (A, B) IHC staining showing ZBP1-positive cells in the cartilage of the four groups (scale bar: 100 μm). (C, D) Safranin O/fast green staining, H&E staining and OARSI scores of the four groups (sham + AAV9-shGFP, n = 8; sham + AAV9-shZBP1, n = 8; DMM + AAV9-shGFP, n = 8; DMM + AAV9-shZBP1, n = 8; scale bar: 200 μm). (E-H) IHC staining showing COL2A1-positive cells and MMP13-positive cells in the cartilage of the four groups (scale bar: 100 μm). (I) Images showing 3D reconstructions of mouse joints; the black arrow indicates an osteophyte (scale bar: 1 mm). (J, K) Transverse sectional images and statistical analysis of the maximum osteophyte outgrowth of each joint in the four groups; the white arrow indicates the osteophyte (scale bar: 1 mm). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

Two weeks after the first injection of AAV9, the mice underwent either DMM surgery or a sham operation. Then, the mice were sacrificed on Day 56 following surgery. Safranin O/fast green staining revealed mild cartilage degradation, as evidenced by the loss of proteoglycans, cartilage erosion, and a higher OARSI score in the joints of the DMM group than in those of the sham group (Fig. 3C, D). In particular, compared with those in the DMM group, the mice in the AAV9-shZBP1 group exhibited less articular cartilage degeneration with lower OARSI scores (Fig. 3C, D). Consistently, the IHC analysis indicated significantly lower levels of MMP13 expression and higher levels of COL2A1 in the AAV-shZBP1-injected mice than in the DMM mice (Fig. 3E-H).

Subchondral bone remodeling and osteophyte formation are typical pathological features of OA [31,32,33]. Moreover, we evaluated the changes in subchondral bone and osteophytes in the four groups. AAV9-shZBP1-injected mice that underwent DMM surgery showed reduced osteophyte formation with a lower osteophyte score (Fig. 3I-K). However, no significant difference in subchondral bone was observed between the AAV9-shZBP1-treated group and the DMM group (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A). Taken together, these results suggested that the downregulation of ZBP1 in cartilage protected mice from DMM-induced cartilage degeneration and osteophyte formation.

ZBP1 interacts with RIPK1 to promote chondrocyte damage via the NF-κB signaling pathway

As ZBP1 harbors the RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM), the interaction of ZBP1 with other RHIM-containing proteins is the foundation of ZBP1 signal transduction, and our previous study showed the pathological role of the RIPK1-NF-κB signaling pathway in inflammatory chondrocytes [34, 35], this evidence prompted us to analyze the interaction between ZBP1 and RIPK1 in chondrocytes.

Therefore, we established adenoviral vectors where the wild type (WT) virus contained the total sequence of ZBP1 and the mutant type virus contained the total sequence of ZBP1 in which the sequence of the RHIM domain was changed. Then, we performed co-IP experiments and found that ZBP1 could bind to p-RIPK1 and that TNF-α treatment could increase binding; mutation in the RHIM region caused this binding to be significantly reduced (Fig. 4A). Consistently, the IF colocalization results revealed increased colocalization of ZBP1 with P-RIPK1 in TNF-α-treated chondrocytes (Fig. 4B, C). The activation of RIPK1 can trigger the TAK1-NF-κB signaling pathway and mediate downstream cellular processes [36, 37]. Therefore, we investigated the impact of RIPK1 on this pathway, and the results showed that ZBP1 knockdown reduced the phosphorylation of TAK1, P65, and RIPK1 compared with that in the TNF-α group (Fig. 4D). The IF results also confirmed that knocking down ZBP1 reduced the nuclear translocation of P65 (Fig. 4E, F). In addition, we observed the effect of ZBP1 on IL-1β-treated chondrocytes and found that knocking down ZBP1 also repressed the phosphorylation of TAK1, P65, and the MAPK signaling pathway (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A, B). We further examined this phenomenon in vivo, and the IHC results revealed that AAV9-ZBP1 also reduced the expression levels of P-P65 and P-RIPK1 in articular cartilage compared to that of DMM group (Fig. 4G, H). Collectively, our data support the hypothesis that ZBP1 can interact with RIPK1 to activate the RIPK1-TAK1-NF-κB signaling pathway, which mediates chondrocyte inflammation and ECM degradation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

ZBP1 interacts with RIPK1 and activates the TAK1-NF-κB pathway. (A) Chondrocytes were infected by Adenoviruses expressing ZBP1 with FLAG (WT), a RHIM domain mutant ZBP1 with FLAG (MUT) following treatment with TNF-α for 15 min. The co-IP analysis detecting the binding of ZBP1 to RIPK1 is shown. (B) ZBP1 and P-RIPK1 colocalization in chondrocytes was detected using IF staining (n = 3; scale bar: 10 μm) and Pearson colocalization coefficient was shown in (C). (D) Western blot analysis of P-TAK1 expression in chondrocytes transfected with siNC or ZBP1 siRNA following TNF-α induction for 12 h (n = 3). Western blot analysis of P-RIPK1, and P-P65 expression in chondrocytes transfected with siNC or ZBP1 siRNA following TNF-α induction for 15 min. (E, F) Images of immunofluorescence staining and statistical analysis of relative P-P65 expression and its distribution in chondrocytes transfected with siNC or ZBP1 siRNA following TNF-α induction for 15 min (n = 3, scale bar: 25 μm). (G-H) IHC staining showing P-RIPK1-positive cells and P-P65-positive cells in the cartilage of the four groups (n = 8; scale bar: 100 μm). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Full size image

ZBP1 expression depends on IRF1

The next key question is why ZBP1 expression is altered during OA development. The above results showed that the Zbp1 mRNA level was increased by TNF-α treatment (Fig. 1I). This result suggested that ZBP1 expression may be affected by transcription. As a method to address this issue, we first used the UCSC Genome Browser database, Signaling Pathways Project (SPP)-ominer database and Cistrome Data Browser to predict the transcription factors regulating ZBP1 expression. Given that ZBP1 is an interferon-induced cytosolic nucleic acid sensor and IRF1 is a pivotal transcription factor of the interferon system [38, 39]. IRF1 was screened out as a possible transcription factor among the intersection of three database (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, we detected the Irf1 and Zbp1 mRNA expression levels under inflammatory conditions. qPCR results revealed that the Irf1 expression level increased significantly at 1 h; however, the increase in Zbp1 expression began at 6 h (Additional file 1: Fig. S5A). This time interval provided some support for our hypothesis. Then, an siRNA was used to knock down the expression of IRF1 in primary chondrocytes, and the knockdown efficiency was confirmed by qPCR (Fig. 5B and Additional file 1: Fig. S5B). Notably, the loss of IRF1 significantly attenuated both the mRNA and protein expression levels of ZBP1 (Fig. 5B-F). Moreover, IRF1 knockdown significantly attenuated TNF-α-induced chondrocyte damage, as revealed by a reduced inflammatory response, reduced ECM catabolism, and restored ECM anabolism (Fig. 5G-P). Functional rescue experiments were conducted to further prove that the expression of ZBP1 was regulated by IRF1. Interestingly, overexpression of ZBP1 reversed the protective effect of IRF1 knockdown on chondrocytes (Fig. 5Q-V). Overall, ZBP1 overexpression depends on the regulation of IRF1.

Fig. 5
figure 5

ZBP1 overexpression depends on IRF1. Chondrocytes were transfected with siNC or IRF1 siRNA for 24 h following TNF-α induction for 12 h. (A) Prediction of transcription factors using the UCSC Genome Browser database, SPP-ominer database, and Cistrome Data Browser. (B) qPCR results showing the relative mRNA expression levels of Irf1 and Zbp1 (n = 3). (C, D) Western blots and quantitative analysis of the relative protein expression level of IRF1 (n = 3). (E, F) Immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence intensity analysis of ZBP1 expression in chondrocytes transfected with siNC or IRF1 siRNA following TNF-α induction for 12 h (n = 3; scale bar: 50 μm). (G-L) Western blots and quantitative analysis of the relative protein expression levels of iNOS, COX2, MMP3, MMP13, AGGRECAN, COL2A1, and SOX9 (n = 3). (M-P) Immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence intensity analysis of COL2A1 and MMP13 expression in chondrocytes transfected with siNC or IRF1 siRNA following TNF-α induction for 12 h (n = 3; scale bar: 50 μm). Chondrocytes were transfected with negative control siRNA(siNC) or IRF1 siRNA (si-Irf1) or ZBP1-plasmid (OE-Zbp1) or empty plasmid (OE-NC) for 24 h following TNF-α induction for 24 h. (Q-V) Western blots and quantitative analysis of the relative protein expression of AGGRECAN, COL2A1, SOX9, iNOS, COX2 MMP13, and MMP3 in chondrocytes (n = 3). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

CsA treatment inhibits the ability of ZBP1 to alleviate chondrocyte damage.

Under conditions of cellular stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, mtDNA can be released into the cytoplasm or extracellular space to engage pattern recognition receptors, including ZBP1 [18]. Therefore, we further explored whether mtDNA released from OA chondrocytes regulates ZBP1. First, we extracted the mtDNA and total cellular DNA from the control and TNF-α groups. qPCR was used to assess the level of mtDNA, and we found that TNF-α led to mtDNA release into the cytoplasm compared with the control group, as evidenced by elevated levels of D-loop, Loop2, and Loop3 (Fig. 6A). The opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTPs) can enable the cytosolic release of mtDNA, and CsA has been verified to inhibit mPTP opening [17]. It was found that found that TNF-α caused more dsDNA released from mitochondria and more colocalization between ZBP1 and dsDNA, while CsA treatment not only decreased the mtDNA level in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6B, C) but also reduced the binding between ZBP1 and dsDNA in the cytoplasm compared to the TNF-α group (Fig. 6D, E). In addition, we also found that CsA reduced the TNF-α-induced expression levels of ZBP1 and p-RIPK1 (Fig. 6F-I). These data indicated that CsA could inhibited mtDNA-ZBP1-RIPK1 axis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The effect of mtDNA on ZBP1. (A) qPCR results showing the relative mtDNA level in the cytoplasm compared to the total DNA level in chondrocytes treated with TNF-α for 12 h (n = 3; mtDNA: D-loop, Loop2 and Loop3). Chondrocytes were treated with TNF-α alone or TNF-α combined with CsA for 12 h. (B) Images of immunofluorescence staining are shown; red indicates mitochondria, green indicates dsDNA, and white arrows indicate dsDNA released from mitochondria (n = 3; scale bar: 10 μm) and Pearson colocalization coefficient was shown in (C). (D) The colocalization of ZBP1 and dsDNA is shown (n = 3; scale bar: 10 μm) and Pearson colocalization coefficient was shown in (E). (F, G) Chondrocytes were treated with TNF-α alone or TNF-α combined with CsA for 48 h, immunofluorescence staining of ZBP1 and fluorescence intensity analysis. (H, I) Chondrocytes were treated with TNF-α alone or TNF-α combined with CsA for 15 min, immunofluorescence staining of P-RIPK1 and fluorescence intensity analysis. Data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

The previous study has indicated that IRFs could be regulated by mtDNA [40]. This finding prompts us to investigate the relationship between mtDNA and activation and expression of IRF1 and reduced the proportion of nuclear IRF1, which indicated reduced activation of IRF1, in TNF-α-treated chondrocytes (Fig. 7A-D). Furthermore, it was observed that the inflammatory response and ECM degradation in chondrocytes were significantly alleviated by CsA treatment (Fig. 7E, F). Collectively, these data indicated that mtDNA might play a dual role in the activity and expression of ZBP1 to cause chondrocyte damage, suggesting that the inhibition of mtDNA release with CsA protects against TNF-α-treated chondrocyte damage.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The effect of mtDNA on IRF1 and chondrocyte damage. Chondrocytes were treated with TNF-α alone or CsA alone or TNF-α combined with CsA for 12 h. (A, B) Western blots and quantitative analysis of expression level of IRF1 (n = 3). (C, D) immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence intensity analysis of IRF1 nuclear location (n = 3). (E, F) Western blots and quantitative analysis of expression level of iNOS, MMP13, and MMP3 (n = 3). Data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

The administration of CsA attenuates murine OA progression

Based on the above findings, we sought to validate whether inhibiting the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1-RIPK1 axis with CsA could protect against OA progression. Different doses of CsA (2 µg/kg and 20 µg/kg) were intra-articularly injected into the joint cavity to achieve local administration. One week after DMM surgery, CsA or vehicle was injected into the joint cavity once a week for 7 continuous weeks. Importantly, CsA administration significantly attenuated cartilage degeneration, as illustrated by Safranin O/fast green staining, HE staining, and a decreased OARSI score (Fig. 8A, B). Consistently, CsA-treated mice manifested lower levels of MMP13, P-RIPK1, and P-P65, together with higher levels of COL2A1 in cartilage than DMM mice (Fig. 8C-F). Moreover, osteophyte formation and subchondral bone formation in the three groups were compared, and the results indicated that osteophyte formation was significantly reduced by CsA treatment, as indicated by a lower osteophyte score and shorter osteophyte outgrowth in the CsA group than in the DMM group (Fig. 8G, H). However, CsA did not significantly change the subchondral bone mass (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A). Taken together, our data indicated that CsA markedly reduced cartilage degeneration and osteophyte formation in OA mice.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Inhibition of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis with CsA protects mice from DMM-induced OA progression. (A, B) Safranin O/fast green staining, HE staining and OARSI scores of the three groups (DMM, n = 10; DMM + CsA (2 µg/kg), n = 10; DMM + CsA (20 µg/kg), n = 10) (scale bar: 200 μm). (C, D) IHC staining showing p-P65-positive cells and p-RIPK1-positive cells in the cartilage of the three groups (scale bar: 100 μm). (E, F) IHC staining showing COL2A1-positive cells and MMP13-positive cells in the cartilage of the three groups (scale bar: 100 μm). (G) Images of 3D reconstructions of mouse joints; the black arrow indicates the osteophyte (scale bar: 1 mm). (H, I) Transverse sectional images and statistical analysis of the maximum osteophyte outgrowth of each joint in the three groups; the white arrow indicates the osteophyte (DMM, n = 8; DMM + CsA (2 µg/kg), n = 8; DMM + CsA (20 µg/kg), n = 8; scale bar: 1 mm). The data are shown as the means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, NS indicates not significant

Full size image

Discussion

ZBP1 is related to innate immunity and a variety of inflammatory diseases [41], but the link between ZBP1 and OA is fully unknown. To our knowledge, this report is the first showing that ZBP1 can regulate inflammatory chondrocytes and contribute to murine OA progression. In our previous study, we identified an essential role for RIPK1 in chondrocyte damage and OA progression, suggesting that the regulation of RIPK1 has an important impact on OA [34, 35, 42]. Furthermore, in this study, we reported that ZBP1 interacted with RIPK1 and elicited downstream cascades, including the activation of NF-κB signaling and ECM degradation. This finding is consistent with the findings that ZBP1 promotes the LPS-induced inflammatory response in macrophages via RHIM-mediated interactions with RIPK1 [43]. These data provide a theoretical basis for the involvement of ZBP1-RIPK1 in the development of OA.

Considering the role of ZBP1 in inflammation-associated diseases, elucidating the regulatory mechanism of ZBP1 expression and activity is important to more precisely target this molecule. Previous studies have suggested that ZBP1 expression can be regulated by interferons [12] or heat shock transcription factor 1 under heat stress conditions [44]. Unfortunately, these conditions seem to have little impact on OA pathogenesis. This gap prompted us to identify a novel regulator of ZBP1. The most exciting discovery in this study is that ZBP1 overexpression occurred in an IRF1-dependent manner, and the loss of IRF1 led to protective effects similar to those of ZBP1 knockdown on chondrocytes.

Released mtDNA acts as a pathological molecule and activator of ZBP1 in various diseases [18, 45, 46]. Although the synovial fluid mtDNA concentration reflects the degree of cartilage damage [19], how mtDNA mediates chondrocyte damage has yet to be determined. In this context, we proposed that inflammatory factors may cause mitochondrial damage and release mtDNA into the cytoplasm to participate in ZBP1 activation. Indeed, we found that TNF-α could cause mtDNA release and binding to ZBP1, while the inhibition of mtDNA release with CsA reversed the above phenomenon and the OA-like phenotype of chondrocytes. Interestingly, we also observed that IRF1 expression was downregulated by CsA treatment, indicating that mtDNA might exert dual regulatory effects on ZBP1 expression and activity. Collectively, these data provide evidence that the IRF1-ZBP1 axis links mtDNA and chondrocyte damage during OA development.

After identifying mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1-RIPK1 as the pathological axis involved in OA pathogenesis, we sought to identify a viable target against OA by inhibiting this axis. Given that mtDNA acts upstream of this axis and that mtDNA release could be effectively blocked by CsA, the therapeutic effect of CSA was assessed on OA mice. Importantly, intra-articular delivery of CsA protected mice from DMM-induced cartilage destruction and osteophyte formation. Additionally, CsA is an FDA-approved drug that is widely applied in clinical practice [47]. This information could aid in the development of CsA as a therapeutic agent for OA.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, although we clarified that ZBP1 was upregulated in an IRF1-dependent manner, the specific binding region involved has yet to be fully elucidated. Secondly, mtDNA can be released by several channels; however, we investigated only the mPTP and did not evaluate voltage-dependent anion-selective channels, which is a major focus of our follow-up studies. Thirdly, CsA is a powerful immunosuppressive drug and might cause side effects in the clinic [48]. The precise dose and therapeutic window of CsA should be optimized in preclinical research. CsA is not specific inhibitor of mtDNA release and CsA plays a role in multiple signaling pathways [48, 49]. We failed to exclude the other possible effects that CsA causes. In addition, the cartilage of eight-week-old mice is not totally mature, which preserves the heal capacity, properly causing a mild cartilage degeneration in OA model. the twelve-week-old mice and aging mice will be used as the model in the future studies.

Conclusions

In summary, this study revealed a positive correlation between ZBP1 expression and OA. We also identified mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1-RIPK1 as the pathological axis involved in chondrocyte damage. In addition, inhibition of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis with CsA protected mice from DMM-induced OA progression (Fig. 9). Our findings highlight the essential role of ZBP1 in linking mtDNA and chondrocyte damage and reveal a new axis that may be used as a target for OA therapy.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Graphical illustration of the role of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis in chondrocyte damage and OA pathogenesis. TNF-α is released into extracellular fluid in OA conditions. TNF-α could stimulate the chondrocytes and cause damage to the mitochondria, resulting in the release of mtDNA into the cytoplasm. The released mtDNA can not only bind to ZBP1 to activate ZBP1, but also stimulate IRF1 transcription which resulting in an increase in the expression of ZBP1. Later, activated ZBP1 can bind and interact with P-RIPK1, causing phosphorylation of TAK1 and P65, leading to the activation of NF-κB pathway which contributes to inflammatory response and ECM degradation. Inhibition of the mtDNA-IRF1-ZBP1 axis with CsA could alleviate chondrocyte damage and DMM-induced OA progression

Full size image

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AAV9:

adeno-associated virus 9

BV/TV:

bone volume/total volume

co-IP:

coimmunoprecipitation

COL2A1:

collagen type II α 1 chain

COX2:

cyclooxygenase-2

CsA:

cyclosporine A

DAMPs:

danger-associated molecular patterns

DMM:

destabilization of the medial meniscus

dsDNA:

double-stranded DNA

ECM:

extracellular matrix

HE:

hematoxylin–eosin

IF:

immunofluorescence

IHC:

immunohistochemistry

IL-1β:

interleukin-1β

IRF1:

interferon regulatory factor 1

micro-CT:

microcomputed tomography

mtDNA:

mitochondrial DNA

MMP3:

matrix metallopeptidase 3

MMP13:

matrix metallopeptidase 13

mPTP:

mitochondrial permeability transition pore

NC:

negative control

OA:

osteoarthritis

OARSI:

Osteoarthritis Research Society International

PAMPs:

pathogen-associated molecular patterns

RHIM:

RIP homotypic interaction motif

siRNA:

small interfering RNA

Tb.N:

trabecular number

Tb.Sp:

trabecular separation

Tb.Th:

trabecular thickness

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor-α

VDAC:

Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel

ZBP1:

Z-DNA binding protein 1

References

  1. Sharma L. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(1):51–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgkinson T, Kelly DC, Curtin CM, O Brien FJ. Mechanosignalling in cartilage: an emerging target for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(2):67–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zindel J, Kubes P. DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in immunity and sterile inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15(1):493–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harapas CR, Idiiatullina E, Al-Azab M, Hrovat-Schaale K, Reygaerts T, Steiner A, Laohamonthonkul P, Davidson S, Yu C, Booty L, Masters SL. Organellar homeostasis and innate immune sensing. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(9):535–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert C, Zappia J, Sanchez C, Florin A, Dubuc J, Henrotin Y. The damage-Associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) as potential targets to treat osteoarthritis: perspectives from a review of the literature. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;7:607186–607186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barreto G, Manninen M. K EK. Osteoarthritis and toll-like receptors: when Innate Immunity meets Chondrocyte apoptosis. Biology (Basel). 2020; 9(4).

  7. Huang Y, Wang G, Ding L, Bai Z, Leng Y, Tian J, Zhang J, Li Y, Ahmad, Qin Y, et al. Lactate-upregulated NADPH-dependent NOX4 expression via HCAR1/PI3K pathway contributes to ROS-induced osteoarthritis chondrocyte damage. Redox Biol. 2023;67:102867–102867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T, Yin C, Boyd DF, Quarato G, Ingram JP, Shubina M, Ragan KB, Ishizuka T, Crawford JC, Tummers B, et al. Influenza virus Z-RNAs induce ZBP1-Mediated necroptosis. Cell. 2020;180(6):1115–e112913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiao H, Wachsmuth L, Kumari S, Schwarzer R, Lin J, Eren RO, Fisher A, Lane R, Young GR, Kassiotis G, et al. Z-nucleic-acid sensing triggers ZBP1-dependent necroptosis and inflammation. Nat (London). 2020;580(7803):391–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuriakose T, Man SM, RK Malireddi S, Karki R, Kesavardhana S, Place DE, Neale G, Vogel P, Kanneganti T. ZBP1/DAI is an innate sensor of influenza virus triggering the NLRP3 inflammasome and programmed cell death pathways. Sci Immunol. 2016;1(2):aag2045–2045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Karki R, Lee S, Mall R, Pandian N, Wang Y, Sharma BR, Malireddi RS, Yang D, Trifkovic S, Steele JA et al. ZBP1-dependent inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and cytokine storm disrupt IFN therapeutic efficacy during coronavirus infection. Sci Immunol.; 7(74):eabo6294.

  12. Devos M, Tanghe G, Gilbert B, Dierick E, Verheirstraeten M, Nemegeer J, de Reuver R, Lefebvre S, De Munck J, Rehwinkel J et al. Sensing of endogenous nucleic acids by ZBP1 induces keratinocyte necroptosis and skin inflammation. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2020; 217(7).

  13. Wang R, Li H, Wu J, Cai Z, Li B, Ni H, Qiu X, Chen H, Liu W, Yang Z, et al. Gut stem cell necroptosis by genome instability triggers bowel inflammation. Nature. 2020;580(7803):386–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahon OR, Kelly DJ, Mccarthy GM, Dunne A. Osteoarthritis-associated basic calcium phosphate crystals alter immune cell metabolism and promote M1 macrophage polarization. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28(5):603–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barreto G, Senturk B, Colombo L, Brück O, Neidenbach P, Salzmann G, Zenobi-Wong M, Rottmar M. Lumican is upregulated in osteoarthritis and contributes to TLR4-induced pro-inflammatory activation of cartilage degradation and macrophage polarization. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28(1):92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim J, Gupta R, Blanco LP, Yang S, Shteinfer-Kuzmine A, Wang K, Zhu J, Yoon HE, Wang X, Kerkhofs M, et al. VDAC oligomers form mitochondrial pores to release mtDNA fragments and promote lupus-like disease. Science. 2019;366(6472):1531–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Xian H, Watari K, Sanchez-Lopez E, Offenberger J, Onyuru J, Sampath H, Ying W, Hoffman HM, Shadel GS, Karin M. Oxidized DNA fragments exit mitochondria via mPTP- and VDAC-dependent channels to activate NLRP3 inflammasome and interferon signaling. Immunity. 2022;55(8):1370–e13858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Saada J, Mcauley RJ, Marcatti M, Tang TZ, Motamedi M, Szczesny B. Oxidative stress induces Z-DNA-binding protein 1–dependent activation of microglia via mtDNA released from retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(1):101523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seewald LA, Sabino IG, Montney KL, Delco ML. Synovial fluid mitochondrial DNA concentration reflects the degree of cartilage damage after naturally occurring articular injury. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023;31(8):1056–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng H, Zhang YB, Gui JF, Lemon SM, Yamane D. Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) and anti-pathogen innate immune responses. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(1):e1009220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Y, Gu R, Gan D, Hu F, Li G, Xu G. Mitochondrial DNA drives noncanonical inflammation activation via cGAS–STING signaling pathway in retinal microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2020;18(1):172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang R, Xu X, Yang J, Chen W, Zhao J, Wang M, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Huang W, Zhang H. BPDE exposure promotes trophoblast cell pyroptosis and induces miscarriage by up-regulating lnc-HZ14/ZBP1/NLRP3 axis. J Hazard Mater. 2023;455:131543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun K, Luo J, Jing X, Xiang W, Guo J, Yao X, Liang S, Guo F, Xu T. Hyperoside ameliorates the progression of osteoarthritis: an in vitro and in vivo study. Phytomedicine. 2021;80:153387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen S, Yang Y, Shen P, Ma J, Fang B, Wang Q, Wang K, Shi P, Fan S, Fang X. circPDE4B prevents articular cartilage degeneration and promotes repair by acting as a scaffold for RIC8A and MID1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(9):1209–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Glasson SS, Blanchet TJ, Morris EA. The surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of osteoarthritis in the 129/SvEv mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(9):1061–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Willemsen J, Neuhoff M, Hoyler T, Noir E, Tessier C, Sarret S, Thorsen TN, Littlewood-Evans A, Zhang J, Hasan M et al. TNF leads to mtDNA release and cGAS/STING-dependent interferon responses that support inflammatory arthritis. Cell Rep. 2021; 37(6).

  27. Xian H, Liou Y. Loss of MIEF1/MiD51 confers susceptibility to BAX-mediated cell death and PINK1-PRKN-dependent mitophagy. Autophagy. 2019;15(12):2107–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun K, Hou L, Guo Z, Wang G, Guo J, Xu J, Zhang X, Guo F. JNK-JUN-NCOA4 axis contributes to chondrocyte ferroptosis and aggravates osteoarthritis via ferritinophagy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2023.

  29. Sanchez-Lopez E, Coras R, Torres A, Lane NE, Guma M. Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(5):258–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Carballo CB, Nakagawa Y, Sekiya I, Rodeo SA. Basic Science of articular cartilage. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36(3):413–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D, Wang L, Yan J, Liu W, Lei X, Wang X. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148(1):213–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wenhui H, Yueqi C, Ce D, Shiwu D. Microenvironment in subchondral bone: predominant regulator for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(4):413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anke JR, Karolina K, Alexandra JR, Meike S, Stephanie TK, Fraser LC, Joanna S, Maxwell AS, Lynn R, Hui W, et al. Identification of the skeletal progenitor cells forming osteophytes in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(12):1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang S, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Chen K, Lv Z, Wang Y, Cheng P, Sun K, Yang Q, Chen A. Decreased RIPK1 expression in chondrocytes alleviates osteoarthritis via the TRIF/MyD88-RIPK1-TRAF2 negative feedback loop. Aging. 2019;11(19):8664–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun K, Guo Z, Zhang J, Hou L, Liang S, Lu F, Wang G, Xu J, Zhang X, Guo F, Zhu W. Inhibition of TRADD ameliorates chondrocyte necroptosis and osteoarthritis by blocking RIPK1-TAK1 pathway and restoring autophagy. Cell Death Discovery. 2023;9(1):109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong WW, Gentle IE, Nachbur U, Anderton H, Vaux DL, Silke J. RIPK1 is not essential for TNFR1-induced activation of NF-κB. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(3):482–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Blonska M, Shambharkar PB, Kobayashi M, Zhang D, Sakurai H, Su B, Lin X. TAK1 is recruited to the Tumor necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) receptor 1 complex in a receptor-interacting protein (RIP)-dependent manner and cooperates with MEKK3 leading to NF-κB Activation*. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(52):43056–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang D, Liang Y, Zhao S, Ding Y, Zhuang Q, Shi Q, Ai T, Wu S, Han J. ZBP1 mediates interferon-induced necroptosis. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(4):356–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou H, Tang Y, Zheng C. Revisiting IRF1-mediated antiviral innate immunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;64:1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yuan L, Mao Y, Luo W, Wu W, Xu H, Wang XL, Shen YH. Palmitic acid dysregulates the Hippo–YAP pathway and inhibits angiogenesis by inducing mitochondrial damage and activating the cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS–STING–IRF3 signaling mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(36):15002–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Karki R, Kanneganti T. ADAR1 and ZBP1 in innate immunity, cell death, and disease. Trends Immunol. 2023;44(3):201–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liang S, Lv Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Dong Y, Wang Z, Chen K, Cheng P, Yang Q, Guo F, et al. Necrostatin-1 attenuates Trauma-Induced mouse osteoarthritis and IL-1β Induced apoptosis via HMGB1/TLR4/SDF-1 in primary mouse chondrocytes. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1378–1378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Muendlein HI, Connolly WM, Magri Z, Smirnova I, Ilyukha V, Gautam A, Degterev A, Poltorak A. ZBP1 promotes LPS-induced cell death and IL-1β release via RHIM-mediated interactions with RIPK1. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yuan F, Cai J, Wu J, Tang Y, Zhao K, Liang F, Li F, Yang X, He Z, Billiar TR, et al. Z-DNA binding protein 1 promotes heatstroke-induced cell death. Science. 2022;376(6593):609–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Enzan N, Matsushima S, Ikeda S, Okabe K, Ishikita A, Yamamoto T, Sada M, Miyake R, Tsutsui Y, Nishimura R, et al. ZBP1 protects against mtDNA-Induced myocardial inflammation in failing hearts. Circ Res. 2023;132(9):1110–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lei Y, Vanportfliet JJ, Chen Y, Bryant JD, Li Y, Fails D, Torres-Odio S, Ragan KB, Deng J, Mohan A, et al. Cooperative sensing of mitochondrial DNA by ZBP1 and cGAS promotes cardiotoxicity. Cell. 2023;186(14):3013–e303222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Guada M, Beloqui A, Kumar MNVR, Préat V, Dios-Viéitez MDC, Blanco-Prieto MJ. Reformulating cyclosporine A (CsA): more than just a life cycle management strategy. J Control Release. 2016;225:269–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nabel GJ. A transformed view of cyclosporine. Nature. 1999;397(6719):471–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jerkins GW, Pattar GR, Kannarr SR. A review of topical cyclosporine a Formulations-A Disease-Modifying Agent for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland N Z). 2020;14:481–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Experimental Medical Research Center of the Research Building of Tongji Hospital for providing a lot of equipment support for our experiment. Such as the general microscope (BX53, Olympus Corporation, Japan).

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82302768), the Project of Health Commission of Hubei Province (No. WJ2021M123), the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program Project of Hubei Province (No. 2022EHB027) and the Knowledge Innovation Project of Wuhan (No. 2022020801010442).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kai Sun and Fan Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

    Kai Sun, Fan Lu, Liangcai Hou, Xiong Zhang, Chunran Pan, Haigang Liu, Zehang Zheng, Zhou Guo, Zhaoxuan Ruan, Yanjun Hou, Jinming Zhang, Fengjing Guo & Wentao Zhu

Authors
  1. Kai Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liangcai Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunran Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haigang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zehang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhou Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhaoxuan Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yanjun Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jinming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fengjing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wentao Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WTZ and KS conceived and designed the study. FL, KS, LCH, XZ, CRP, HGL, ZXR, and YJH performed the experiments. FL, LCH, and CRP performed a statistical analysis. ZG, ZHZ, JMZ, and FJG provided materials and critical review. KS and FL wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wentao Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The collection of human specimens was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB20210905). The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Hospital (IACUC No.: TJH202301008).

Consent for publication

All the authors have read and approved the manuscript in all respects for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, K., Lu, F., Hou, L. et al. IRF1 regulation of ZBP1 links mitochondrial DNA and chondrocyte damage in osteoarthritis. Cell Commun Signal 22, 366 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01744-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01744-1

Keywords

Cell Communication and Signaling

ISSN: 1478-811X