Wikidata:Property proposal/tartan image
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
tartan image
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
Description | image of the item's tartan |
---|---|
Represents | tartan (Q216797) |
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png |
Example 2 | Clan Scott (Q913761)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scott_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png |
Example 3 | Burberry (Q390107)→https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burberry_pattern.svg |
Source | https://www.tartanregister.gov.uk/index |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Motivation
[edit]A lot of organizations, clans, families, individuals have their own tartan. Tartans can be done the same way how coat of arms and flags are encoded into Wikidata.
Discussion
[edit]Oppose We should not repeat the same mistakes made with coat of arms properties. We can use the tartan item with P18: Duke of Rothesay (Q1059510)<tartan><tartan item>
image (P18)File:Prince_of_Rothesay_tartan_(Vestiarium_Scoticum).png. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) - @Tinker Bell Can I ask what mistakes were made with the CoA properties? Jhowie Nitnek 18:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm talking about redundancy: coat of arms image (P94) is redundant because the same relationship can be expressed by doing <item>coat of arms (P237)<item for CoA>
image (P18). Having these extra properties make more difficult reusing data, because an user has to be aware of all of these ways to express data, instead of just one. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 21:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) - @Tinker Bell Then you could say the same for flag image right? Jhowie Nitnek 20:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- @JhowieNitnek: Yes. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 20:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Tinker Bell Then you could say the same for flag image right? Jhowie Nitnek 20:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm talking about redundancy: coat of arms image (P94) is redundant because the same relationship can be expressed by doing <item>coat of arms (P237)<item for CoA>
- @Tinker Bell Can I ask what mistakes were made with the CoA properties? Jhowie Nitnek 18:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Oppose in lieu of the item-based proposal, per Tinker Bell. Arlo Barnes (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done, not created per lack of support. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)