Wikidata:Property proposal/BookBrainz publisher ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BookBrainz publisher ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
| Represents | BookBrainz (Q56100780) |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | publishing company (Q2085381), imprint (Q2608849) |
| Allowed values | [0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12} |
| Example 1 | Penguin Books (Q1336200) → 6818c882-97d0-44c5-a314-5bac3c455bc0 |
| Example 2 | Penguin Classics (Q11281443) → 583ff91b-f948-415e-a171-d5c322e8e5dc |
| Example 3 | Klett-Cotta Verlag (Q1444698) → 836aa592-e0fe-4242-abab-ee5f98ec7985 |
| Example 4 | Gnome Press (Q5574338) → 47dff20f-188e-4389-a337-cfb0fdd49972 |
| Source | https://bookbrainz.org/help |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Number of IDs in source | 473 |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | https://bookbrainz.org/publisher/$1 |
| See also | BookBrainz author ID (P2607), BookBrainz work ID (P7823) |
Motivation
[edit]The ID can be used to fetch a curated list of a publisher's titles and other data. Data are retrievable through either the website or a public API. Authors and works on BookBrainz are already linked by Wikidata properties, but publishers and imprints are not. —Ringbang (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)- Support However, why expected to always be incomplete? I feel like all these publishing entities are notable as they will fulfil a structural need. --SilentSpike (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @SilentSpike: To the extent that there is a structural need, I agree. My reluctance to expect eventual completeness is because of criterion 2 of WD:N, which requires that entities must be describable "using serious and publicly available references". In the case of highly obscure works, would BookBrainz alone satisfy this criterion? Remember that a "publishing house" can just be a name chosen to self-publish a single edition with a small print run. Would such cases prevent eventual completion? —Ringbang (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Ringbang, ArthurPSmith, SilentSpike:
Done --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 05:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
