User talk:Fralambert/Archive 7

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Fralambert/Archive

Q123437835

[edit]

Hello, I plan on adding several v-tubers or content creators to the platform and would like to determine why this fell under the promotion and lack of nobility category. This particular streamer is quite well-known on Tiktok and has recently started broadcasting on Twitch. Perhaps management should have been been library in my username, if that is where the promotion aspect came from. I am happy to discuss this in more detail @Fralambert. I'd also say it fulfills a structural need, as this vtuber is apart of a wider group of content creators and for completion sake - should be included. Vtubermanagement (talk) 00:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The item in question didn't have any source in it. Do you have some? Fralambert (talk) 02:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Social information was retrieved taken from their schema listed within their source code and shown on their official website. It's the streamername followed by .com, not sure if I can post links directly here without getting flagged.
Earlier today, I was also able to reach out and have her developers add the wikidata URL as "SameAs" within their People schema - it should still be in the source. Vtubermanagement (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fralambert Vtubermanagement (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Official website of a person count as autopromotion and are not reliabe source. You can't built notability with that. Fralambert (talk) 12:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #603

[edit]

You deleted Q1467687 with a reference to Wikidata:Notability. As far a I see Q1467687 (Volksmehr) fulfills the second point of Wikidata:Notability. For example the entity is described in https://www.wortbedeutung.info/Volksmehr/. Fomafix (talk) 09:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fomafix OK, I recreate it, but You should probably rework the item because it's actually just a duplicate one. Fralambert (talk) 11:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I updated the items. Lots of items are wrongly marked as duplicate. --Fomafix (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #604

[edit]

You deleted Q1383650 with a reference to Wikidata:Notability. As far a I see Q1383650 contained something about Occlusion Culling, which is a clearly identifiable conceptual. Fomafix (talk) 16:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fomafix Recreated. Fralambert (talk) 03:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[Wikidata] Weekly Summary #605

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #606

[edit]

Q123894743 deletion

[edit]

Hi @Fralambert. You deleted the Q123894743 entry but it is the company that owns Q123434360. Could you tell me if there is a statement to associate this correspondence? In this way, Q123894743 would respect the Wikidata:Notability. You can reply below, I'll read! --93.70.172.148 14:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be owned by (P127) in nientepopcorn (Q123434360). I can recreate it as structural need. Fralambert (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Fralambert. I entered the end date of the previous company's mandate and the start date of the new company's mandate. I hope I did the right job! --93.70.172.148 15:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #607

[edit]

Q107419122

[edit]

Hi, is there a way to see which content was deleted here? Thanks! Azertus (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The item was "Holoncom: Dotnetnuke Service Provider". It have actually no source at all. Fralambert (talk) 14:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did you delete with Q115117721, Q115117555, Q115117517 and why?

[edit]

Can you tell me what you deleted and why?

These deletions might be reasonable, but they may also be items that are used in Wikipedia, Wikiversity or Wikiquote. In the latter case, the Wikidata software may be giving you erroneous information, claiming the items are not being used, when they are. That may not be true today, but I know it was true a couple of years ago. At that time, I convinced a Wikidata administrator to restore at least one Wikidata item that had been deleted, so I could know what had been deleted.

Before you delete more Wikidata items, I wish you would pressure the software development team to implement two changes in their softwareː

  1. Every email notice of a change to a Wikidata item should include the name of the item in a language that's closest to the language officially used by the "watcher". I mostly write in English, but I have Wikidata address me in Spanish, to help me maintain fluency in Spanish. An email notice of a change to a Wikidata item should, I think, include the name of the item in the language preferred by the user, unless no such name is provided, in which case I think it should use the most commonly used language for which a name is available.
  2. Every Wikidata item should include "File usage on other wikis", or at least a way to get that information. That information is available for items on Wikimedia Commons. It should not be that hard to implement it for Wikidata as well. Without that information, administrators who delete Wikidata items that are being used, breaking references in Wikipedia, Wikiversity, Wikiquote, etc., without you even knowing that you broke anything -- and without me knowing what got broken unless I just happened to be checking something and found a reference to a QID that had been deleted, possibly months earlier.

In addition, I would appreciate receiving a notice BEFORE you delete a Wikidata item. With, e.g., articles for deletion in Wikipedia, at least I get a notice before it is deleted, so I have a chance to respond. Such notice should include clear criteria of what I would need to do to prevent the item from being deleted. In this case, I have no idea what items were deleted and why. Are you trying to discourage people from using Wikdata? If yes, one way to do that is to delete Wikidata items at random without telling "watchers" what you are deleting and why -- and without giving them reasonable recourse to complain. A couple of years ago, a Wikidata administrator deleted a Wikidata item about a book, because I had not provided an ISBN. I've been more careful since to provide ISBNs where such seem appropriate and available.

Are you telling me that I have to maintain a list of all the Wikidata items I create and where I use them, so when some administrator deletes a Wikidata item, I can at least identify what got broken?

In this case, I remember creating a Wikidata item a day or two ago that only had the title. Then I got distracted and did not complete the entry. It would be nice if you'd give me advance warning before you delete something, so I have a chance to add other information if needed.

Thanks, ̴̴̴̴̴̴̴ DavidMCEddy (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fralambert: I am currently drafting a new working paper to post to Wikiversity, and I'm creating several {{cite Q|...}} references for that. Are you telling me that I can no longer use {{cite Q|...}} or at least can NOT create those references until I'm ready to post the article? That will make it difficult for me, because I can NOT know the QIDs until after the Wikidata items are created, but if I create them before I post the article, they might be deleted prefunctorily because they aren't being used [yet] ??? It can sometimes take a long time to create such. I've been working on one project for years, intermittently spinning off new portions of it as new stand-alone articles under Wikiversity:category:Freedom and abundance.
A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TOPIC: I feel a need to complain about the active processing of Mediawiki marking language in Wikidata Talk, because it's different from other Wikimedia Foundation Projects, and it's difficult for me to see if I have errors in the markup language, because some if it is not displayed. For example, how many times do I have to enter "~" to get my signature block? (Note that my signature above is preceded by "~". How did that happen? Because I entered "~" 5 or more times to be sure I got 4? And just now, I'm having to compose this comment away from this talk page, so I know what I'm typing. Even "~" does not display as I expect: I get a tilde over a double quote mark. ??? Just now I saw that I had failed to indent the previous paragraph, so I inserted a ":" before {{re|Fralambert}}. When I clicked "Preview", it showed the colon before {{re|Fralambert}} and did not indent. This is making it very hard for me to create this comment.
Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I recreated them, but they don't seem different as all the other entrepreneur item I delete all the other days. Don't be surprise if it return in RfD a another day at this state. Also this is may talk page, you don't have to ping me. ;) Fralambert (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ːˑThanks. What are the requirements for notability? Why were they deleted? I created them over a year ago. I probably used them somewhere, but I don't know how to find them. If I did, then wherever I used one of them, there will be a cite Q|... reference that is broken that will be worse than a URL to a broken linkː Many and probably most broken URLs can be found in the ʽwːWayback machineʼ. I've posted my suggested changes in software and procedures to ʽWikidata:Report a technical problem#Problems with Wikidata deletionsʼ. (At least a naked URL still seems to work, but I otherwise now seem unable to control many other normally standard features of the MediaWiki software including indent, numbered list, and even my signature block). Thanks again, ʽuserːDavidMCEddyʼ, ̴̴

The notability criterion didn't change as much as they are WD:N. So have a sitelink, or clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity with serious and publicly available references, or fulfill a structural need. --Fralambert (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #608

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #609

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #610

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #611

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #612

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #613

[edit]

Un peu merci

[edit]

Bonjour Fralambert. Ta inclusion de mes photos d'Île Harrington a été amélioré ma journée. Merci beaucoup de tes actions. Bonne journée. - Emilijaknezevic (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #614

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #615

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #617

[edit]

This item was deleted before I got the chance to check it, and I can't see the history. What was this item about? Cavernia (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The item was Hazel Moore, a British Entrepreneur. Do you have any reliable source? Because the item didn't have any. Fralambert (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the mirror site

[edit]

Can you? please. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Quiklav thanks for ur support... Quiklav (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quiklav ✓ Done Enjoy. Fralambert (talk) 03:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #618

[edit]

Demande d'aide avec le processus de vérification de BOT

[edit]

Selon Wikidata:Bots, il suffit d'ouvrir une requête pour avoir les permissions puis ensuite de permettre au BOT de faire 50 à 250 modifications pour éventuellement être évalué et avoir la permission de continuer. Comment puis-je avoir du feedback sur la demande que j'ai faite? Combien de temps est ce que ça pourrait prendre? JanssenSimon3 (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

J'ignore, j'ai jamais eu de bot sur aucun wiki. Il s'agit juste d'attendre, tous les contributeurs sont des bénévoles et ils vont éventuellement répondre. Fralambert (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P31 = rivière

[edit]

Bonjour, il y a un petit comique qui a modifié tous les P31 des rivière du Québec par cours d'eau, du coup il devient impossible de faire la discrimination entre une rivière et un ruisseau. Cela ma pris beaucoup de temps pour mettre le type d'entité de la CTQ sur les éléments et voilà que ce contributeur a tout bouzillé. :( Yanik B 12:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je remets rivière quand je tombe dessus, avec une source la la CTQ. (Il a modifié seul ceux non sourcé) Fralambert (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planétarium Queen Elizabeth II

[edit]

Rebonjour. Je me suis rendu compte que le système me permettrait d'ajouter une deuxième date d'ouverture, donc c'est ce que j'ai fait, pour l'instant. merci, Shawn à Montréal (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #619

[edit]

Wikidata weekly Summary #620

[edit]

Invitation to participate in the WQT UI requirements elicitation online workshop

[edit]

Dear Fralambert,

I hope you are doing well,

We are a group of researchers from King’s College London working on developing WQT (Wikidata Quality Toolkit), which will support a diverse set of editors in curating and validating Wikidata content.

We are inviting you to participate in an online workshop aimed at understanding the requirements for designing effective and easy-to-use user interfaces (UI) for three tools within WQT that can support the daily activities of Wikidata editors: recommending items to edit based on their personal preferences, finding items that need better references, and generating entity schemas automatically for better item quality.

The main activity during this workshop will be UI mockup sketching. To facilitate this, we encourage you to attend the workshop using a tablet or laptop with PowerPoint installed or any other drawing tools you prefer. This will allow for a more interactive and productive session as we delve into the UI mockup sketching activities.

Participation is completely voluntary. You should only take part if you want to and choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. However, your cooperation will be valuable for the WQT design. Please note that all data and responses collected during the workshop will be used solely for the purpose of improving the WQT and understanding editor requirements. We will analyze the results in an anonymized form, ensuring your privacy is protected. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be deleted once it has served its purpose in this research.

The online workshop, which will be held on April 5th, should take no more than 3 hours.

If you agree to participate in this workshop, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form to register your interest https://forms.office.com/e/9mrE8rXZVg Then, I will contact you with all the instructions for the workshop.

For more information about my project, please read this page: https://king-s-knowledge-graph-lab.github.io/WikidataQualityToolkit/

If you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me at the email address mentioned above.

Thank you for considering taking part in this project.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 16:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly Summary #621

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #622

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #623

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #622

[edit]

Q124821060 has vanished

[edit]

You deleted Q124821060 (Does not meet the notability policy: RfD: Out of project scope; advertising non notable person). I wanted to let you know that Q124821060 was for a draft on English Wikipedia, [:en:Draft:Notti Osama]] (Ethan Reyes (January 17, 2008 – July 9, 2022), known professionally as Notti Osama, ...) Please restore it. Eastmain (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eastmain Recreated, I suggest to add some source in Notti Osama (Q124821060) or it may go in RfD again. Fralambert (talk) 22:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #624

[edit]

Deleted entries required by the Name Suggestion Index

[edit]

Could you please undelete both Q113529463 (Keatons) and Q109768523 (Growing Communities) as these are required by the Name Suggestion Index. Also, I see that Q123614107 was deleted as well, but I am unable to find out what this corresponded to and why it wasn't notable - could you please confirm? Whatisbetter (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated for the tow first. As for Q123614107, it was DEPT, it only have social media. Fralambert (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #625

[edit]

Undelete

[edit]

Hello, can you undelete Q117348980 and Q117348681 as they were notable ? I've not even yet heard the answer to my question on the deletion project. Bouzinac💬✒️💛 16:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't why simple date is notable. And January 4, 1914 (Q69259875) is not notable too. Fralambert (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, je vois besoin structurel pour Commons. Mais faudrait avoir le même traitement que les date grégorienne, où c'est pas trop utile. Fralambert (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bouzinac Les deux éléments ont été recréés. Fralambert (talk) 18:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ce sont des dates dans deux calendriers différents... Notabilité faible, je suis d'accord, mais c'est sourcé et ça peut aider à convertir d'un calendrier à l'autre Bouzinac💬✒️💛 18:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, je les ai recréé et lié à la date précédente et suivante. Ce qui devrait être fait comme le calendrier grégorien. Fralambert (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #626

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
This is the Wikidata summary of the week before 2024-05-06.
Translations are available.

Discussions

Events

Press, articles, blog posts, videos

Tool of the week

  • Wikidata periodic table - Tool by User:Ricordisamoa, to browse all chemical elements available on Wikidata, with atomic number, chemical symbol, and localized label. It also includes two charts of the nuclides, with links to every isotope in Wikidata, colored by half-life or decay mode.

Other Noteworthy Stuff

  • A new UI mode is available for the online validator for EntitySchemas. It represents validation reports as a table rather than a very long string, and replaces most links with hyperlinks with some of the text behind them; making them easier to read. Currently being tested at https://shex-validator.toolforge.org/packages/shex-webapp/doc/shex-simple-improved.html, we are looking for participants to evaluate this tool. Some experience with editing Wikidata is appreciated, but no experience working with Schemas is required. If you are interested, you can sign up here. We hope to begin interviews around May 13. For more details, visit User:M.alten.tue

Newest properties and property proposals to review

You can comment on all open property proposals!

Did you know?

Development

  • We attended the Wikimedia Hackathon.
  • REST API: We are finishing the route for creating an Item (phab:T342990) and modify the data of a Property (phab:T347394)
  • EntitySchemas: We are continuing the work on creating the new datatype to link to EntitySchemas in statements (phab:T214884)

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

Weekly Tasks

· Unsubscribe · Help translate · MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #627

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
This is the Wikidata summary of the week before 2024-05-13.
Please help Translate.

Discussions

Press, articles, blog posts, videos

Tool of the week

Newest properties and property proposals to review

You can comment on all open property proposals!

Did you know?

Development You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

Weekly Tasks

· Unsubscribe · Help translate · Mohammed Abdulai (WMDE) (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion

[edit]

Could you please restore the following deleted items? This refers to a upcoming comic book series of item Q125768759:

Here i'm providing you official notable link resources for the deleted items:

Loischaa (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that Fandom, as any other wikis, is a valid source for establishing notability. You have something else? Fralambert (talk) 22:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But this project is now in it's pre production phase and production company dose not releases it any where other then there fandom database. If it is still not acceptable then i will try to recreate this items after its release or when it will released publicly. Loischaa (talk) 15:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #628

[edit]