Hi,
Would it be a good idea or not to add statements for homographs on Sumerian and Akkadian Lexemes? For instanceĀ : ama/š¼ (L1)homograph lexeme (P5402)dagal/š¼ (L732940) (and vice-versa of course).
What do you think? If it's correct, I can do them semi-automatically.
Cheers,
Currently, I think that is the right way to do it, because they are written the same way in cuneiform, but I want to be sure here and would like to ask my colleagues (Assyriologists) about their opinion first.
I will get back to you.
Yes, to be explicit: it would be based on the cuneiforms, the latin transcription wouldn't make sense (but maybe even for cuneiforms it doesn't make sense either). Here is a quick query of the lexeme concerned: https://w.wiki/6fpL
Good, the more dvice, the better. And no hurry, just let me know.
From our side this seems good to go.
Should be no problem to mark these as homograph lexemes.
I was a bit busy but it's done now. If you haveany comment or see errors, please tell me and I'll correct it.
Thanks, as far as I can see it looks good. If I get any different feedback, I will let you know