Category: All posts
Jun 11, 2025
Posted by
Mike Freedman
Ingest performance is critical for many common PostgreSQL use cases, including application monitoring, application analytics, IoT monitoring, and more. These use cases have something in common: unlike standard relational "business" data, changes are treated as inserts, not overwrites. In other words, every new value becomes a new row in the database instead of replacing the row's prior value with the latest one.
If you're operating in a scenario where you need to retain all data vs. overwriting past values, optimizing the speed at which your database can ingest new data becomes essential.
At TigerData (the creators of TimescaleDB), we have a lot of experience optimizing performance, so in this article, we will look at PostgreSQL inserts and how to improve their performance. We'll include the following:
1. Useful tips for improving PostgreSQL insert performance, in general, such as moderating your use of indexes, reconsidering foreign key constraints, avoiding unnecessary UNIQUE keys, using separate disks for WAL (Write-Ahead Logging) and data, and deploying on performant disks. Each of these strategies can help optimize the speed at which your database ingests new data.
2. TimescaleDB-specific insert performance tips (TimescaleDB works like PostgreSQL under the hood).
One of PostgreSQL's fundamental commands, the INSERT operation plays a crucial role in adding new data to a database. It adds one or more rows to a table, filling each column with specified data. When certain columns are not specified in the insert query, PostgreSQL automatically fills these columns with their default values, if any are defined. This feature ensures that the database maintains integrity and consistency, even when all column values are not provided.
The INSERT operation is fundamental for data ingest processes, where new data is continually added to the database. It allows for the efficient and organized storage of new information, making it accessible for querying and analysis.
Here’s a simple example of an INSERT query:
INSERT INTO employees (name, position, department)
VALUES ('John Doe', 'Software Engineer', 'Development');In this example, the INSERT INTO statement specifies the table employees to which the row will be added. The columns name, position, and department are explicitly mentioned, indicating where the provided data should be inserted.
Following the VALUES keyword, the actual data to be inserted into these columns is provided in parentheses. If the employees table contains other columns for which default values are defined and are not included in the INSERT statement, PostgreSQL will automatically fill those columns with the default values.
The speed at which data can be ingested into a database directly impacts its utility and responsiveness, especially when reaction speed in real-time or near-real-time data processing is essential.
One prominent example of such a use case is time-series data management. Time-series data, characterized by its sequential nature, accumulates moment by moment, often originating from sensors, financial transactions, or user activity logs.
The value of time-series data lies in its timeliness and the insights that can be gleaned from analyzing patterns over time. To maintain the integrity and relevance of these insights, insert performance must be optimized to ensure data is updated consistently and without delay. High insert performance allows for the seamless integration of new data, preserving the chronological order and enabling accurate real-time analysis.
Application monitoring represents another critical area where insert performance is paramount. Effective monitoring systems rely on continuously ingesting application metrics and logs to provide an up-to-date view of the application's health and performance. Any lag in data ingest can lead to delays in detecting and responding to issues, potentially affecting user experience and system stability. Strong insert performance ensures that monitoring systems remain current, allowing for immediate action in response to any anomalies detected.
Event detection applications, such as fraud detection systems, also underscore the importance of fast insert speeds. In these scenarios, the ability to rapidly ingest and process data can mean the difference between catching a fraudulent transaction as it happens or missing it entirely.
Fast data ingest enables these systems to analyze events in real time, applying algorithms to detect suspicious patterns and react promptly. The reaction speed is crucial in minimizing risk and protecting assets, highlighting the critical role of insert performance in maintaining system efficacy.
The previous use cases stress the critical role of ingest speed in real-time or high-volume databases, such as those handling time series. These use cases make up for most of our customer base here at TigerData, so we're pretty confident to recommend these five best practices for improving ingest performance in vanilla PostgreSQL:
Having the right indexes can speed up your queries, but they’re not a silver bullet. Incrementally maintaining indexes with each new row requires additional work. Check the number of indexes you’ve defined on your table (use the psql command \d table_name), and determine whether their potential query benefits outweigh the storage and insert overhead. Since every system is different, there aren’t any hard and fast rules or “magic number” of indexes—just be reasonable.
Sometimes, it's necessary to build foreign keys (FK) from one table to other relational tables. When you have an FK constraint, every INSERT will typically need to read from your referenced table, which can degrade performance. Consider denormalizing your data—we sometimes see pretty extreme use of FK constraints from a sense of “elegance” rather than engineering trade-offs.
Developers are often trained to specify primary keys in database tables, and many ORMs love them. Yet, many use cases—including common monitoring or time-series applications—don’t require them, as each event or sensor reading can simply be logged as a separate event by inserting it at the tail of a hypertable's current chunk during write time.
If a UNIQUE constraint is otherwise defined, that insert can necessitate an index lookup to determine if the row already exists, which will adversely impact the speed of your INSERT.
While this is a more advanced optimization that isn't always needed, if your disk becomes a bottleneck, you can further increase throughput by using a separate disk (tablespace) for the database's WAL and data.
Sometimes developers deploy their database in environments with slower disks, whether due to poorly-performing HDD, remote storage area networks (SANs), or other types of configurations. And because when you insert rows, the data is durably stored in the WAL before the transaction completes, slow disks can impact insert performance. One thing to do is check your disk IOPS using the ioping command.
Read test:
$ ioping -q -c 10 -s 8k .
--- . (hfs /dev/disk1 930.7 GiB) ioping statistics ---
9 requests completed in 208 us, 72 KiB read, 43.3 k iops, 338.0 MiB/s
generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 80 KiB, 1 iops, 8.88 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 18 us / 23.1 us / 35 us / 6.17 usWrite test:
$ ioping -q -c 10 -s 8k -W .
--- . (hfs /dev/disk1 930.7 GiB) ioping statistics ---
9 requests completed in 10.8 ms, 72 KiB written, 830 iops, 6.49 MiB/s
generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 80 KiB, 1 iops, 8.89 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 99 us / 1.20 ms / 2.23 ms / 919.3 usYou should see at least thousands of read IOPS and many hundreds of write IOPS. If you are seeing far fewer, your disk hardware is likely affecting your INSERT performance. See if alternative storage configurations are feasible.
TimescaleDB is built to improve query and ingest performance in PostgreSQL.
The most common uses for TimescaleDB involve storing massive amounts of data for cloud infrastructure metrics, product analytics, web analytics, IoT devices, and many use cases involving large PostgreSQL tables. The ideal TimescaleDB scenarios are time-centric, almost solely append-only (lots of INSERTs), and require fast ingestion of large amounts of data within small time windows.
Here you have eight more techniques for improving ingest performance with TimescaleDB:
Each INSERT or COPY command to TimescaleDB (as in PostgreSQL) is executed as a single transaction and thus runs in a single-threaded fashion. To achieve higher ingest, you should execute multiple INSERT or COPY commands in parallel.
For help with bulk loading large CSV files in parallel, check out TimescaleDB's parallel copy command.
⭐ Pro tip: make sure your client machine has enough cores to execute this parallelism (running 32 client workers on a 2 vCPU machine doesn’t help much— the workers won’t actually be executed in parallel).
To achieve higher ingest rates, you should insert your data with many rows in each INSERT call (or else use some bulk insert command, like COPY or our parallel copy tool).
Don't insert your data row-by-row—instead, try at least hundreds (or thousands) of rows per insert. This allows the database to spend less time on connection management, transaction overhead, SQL parsing, etc., and more time on data processing.
We typically recommend 25 % of available RAM. If you install TimescaleDB via a method that runs timescaledb-tune, it should automatically configure shared_buffers to something well-suited to your hardware specs.
Note: in some cases, typically with virtualization and constrained cgroups memory allocation, these automatically-configured settings may not be ideal. To check that your shared_buffers are set to within the 25 % range, run SHOW shared_buffers from your psql connection.
If you are running a TimescaleDB Docker container (which runs Linux) on top of another Linux operating system, you're in great shape. The container is basically providing process isolation, and the overhead is extremely minimal.
If you're running the container on a Mac or Windows machine, you'll see some performance hits for the OS virtualization, including for I/O.
Instead, if you need to run on Mac or Windows, we recommend installing directly instead of using a Docker image.
We don't currently recommend using space partitioning. And if you do, remember that this number of chunks is created for every time interval.
So, if you create 64 space partitions and daily chunks, you'll have 24,640 chunks per year. This may lead to a bigger performance hit during query time (due to planning overhead) than during insert time, but it's something to consider nonetheless.
Another thing to avoid is using an incorrect integer value when you specify the time interval range in create_hypertable.
⭐ Pro tip:
chunk_relation_size_pretty to make sure your chunk sizes or partition ranges seem reasonable:=> SELECT chunk_table, ranges, total_size
FROM chunk_relation_size_pretty('hypertable_name')
ORDER BY ranges DESC LIMIT 4;
chunk_table | ranges | total_size
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+------------
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_96_chunk | {"['2020-02-13 23:00:00+00','2020-02-14 00:00:00+00')"} | 272 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_95_chunk | {"['2020-02-13 22:00:00+00','2020-02-13 23:00:00+00')"} | 500 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_94_chunk | {"['2020-02-13 21:30:00+00','2020-02-13 22:00:00+00')"} | 500 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_93_chunk | {"['2020-02-13 20:00:00+00','2020-02-13 21:00:00+00')"} | 500 MBTo maintain higher ingest rates, you want your latest chunk and all its associated indexes to stay in memory so that writes to the chunk and index updates merely update memory. (The write is still durable, as inserts are written to the WAL on disk before the database pages are updated.)
If your chunks are too large, then writes to even the latest chunk will start swapping to disk.
As a rule of thumb, we recommend that the latest chunks and all their indexes fit comfortably within the database's shared_buffers. You can check your chunk sizes via the chunk_relation_size_pretty SQL command.
=> SELECT chunk_table, table_size, index_size, toast_size, total_sizeFROM chunk_relation_size_pretty('hypertable_name')ORDER BY ranges DESC LIMIT 4;
chunk_table | table_size | index_size | toast_size | total_size
-----------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_96_chunk | 200 MB | 64 MB | 8192 bytes | 272 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_95_chunk | 388 MB | 108 MB | 8192 bytes | 500 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_94_chunk | 388 MB | 108 MB | 8192 bytes | 500 MB
_timescaledb_internal._hyper_1_93_chunk | 388 MB | 108 MB | 8192 bytes | 500 MBIf your chunks are too large, you can update the range for future chunks via the set_chunk_time_interval command. However, this does not modify the range of existing chunks (e.g., by rewriting large chunks into multiple small chunks).
For configurations where individual chunks are much larger than your available memory, we recommend dumping and reloading your hypertable data to properly sized chunks.
Keeping the latest chunk applies to all active hypertables; if you are actively writing to two hypertables, the latest chunks from both should fit within shared_buffers.
When chunks are sized appropriately (see #10 and #11), the latest chunk(s) and their associated indexes are naturally maintained in memory. New rows inserted with recent timestamps will be written to these chunks and indexes already in memory.
If a row with a sufficiently older timestamp is inserted—i.e., it's an out-of-order or backfilled write—the disk pages corresponding to the older chunk (and its indexes) will need to be read in from disk. This will significantly increase write latency and lower insert throughput.
Particularly, when you are loading data for the first time, try to load data in sorted, increasing timestamp order.
Be careful if you're bulk-loading data about many different servers, devices, and so forth:
The overhead from inserting a wide row (say, 50, 100, 250 columns) is going to be much higher than inserting a narrower row (more network I/O, more parsing and data processing, larger writes to WAL, etc.). Most of our published benchmarks are using TSBS, which uses 12 columns per row. So you'll correspondingly see lower insert rates if you have very wide rows.
If you are considering very wide rows because you have different types of records, and each type has a disjoint set of columns, you might want to try using multiple hypertables (one per record type)—particularly if you don't often query across these types.
Additionally, JSONB records are another good option if virtually all columns are sparse. That said, if you're using sparse wide rows, use NULLs for missing records whenever possible, not default values, for the most performance gains (NULLs are much cheaper to store and query).
Finally, the cost of wide rows is actually much less once you compress rows using TimescaleDB’s native compression. Rows are converted into more columnar compressed form, sparse columns compress extremely well, and compressed columns aren’t read from disk for queries that don’t fetch individual columns.
If ingest performance is critical to your use case, consider using TimescaleDB. You can get started with hosted TimescaleDB (Tiger Clouud) for free today or download TimescaleDB to your own hardware.
Our approach to support is to address your whole solution, so we're here to help you achieve your desired performance results (see more details about our Support team and ethos).
Lastly, our Slack community is a great place to connect with 8,000+ other developers with similar use cases, as well as myself, TigerData engineers, product team members, and developer advocates.
If you're interested in improving your PostgreSQL performance, you'll find the following resources useful:
👉 Navigating growing PostgreSQL tables. Are your PostgreSQL queries slowing down as your database tables grow? Learn about a few tactics that can get you back on track.
👉 When to consider PostgreSQL partitioning. Postgres partitioning can be a powerful tool to scale your database, although it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Learn if it's the solution you're looking for.
👉 When your tables start growing, it might be time for some PostgreSQL fine-tuning. Get advice on how to optimize your database step by step:
👉 Further tips on improving inserts.
Q: How can I improve PostgreSQL insert performance when dealing with large amounts of data?
A: To optimize PostgreSQL insert performance, focus on using indexes in moderation, inserting rows in batches rather than one by one, and ensuring your disk hardware is performant. If disk becomes a bottleneck, consider using separate disks for WAL and data. For bulk loading data, try tools like TimescaleDB's parallel copy command, which can significantly increase throughput.
Q: What role do indexes and constraints play in PostgreSQL insert performance?
A: While indexes speed up queries, they can slow down inserts since each new row requires index maintenance. Foreign key constraints force PostgreSQL to read from referenced tables during inserts, and UNIQUE constraints necessitate index lookups to check for duplicates. Consider whether these constraints are truly necessary for your use case, especially for append-only scenarios like time-series data.
Q: How should I configure my hardware for optimal PostgreSQL insert performance?
A: Use performant disks capable of thousands of read IOPS and hundreds of write IOPS, which you can check with the ioping command. Configure shared_buffers to approximately 25% of available RAM to ensure enough memory for caching active data. If running in containers, use Linux hosts for Docker images to minimize virtualization overhead.
Q: What's the optimal approach for batch inserting data into PostgreSQL?
A: Instead of row-by-row insertion, batch hundreds or thousands of rows per INSERT command to reduce overhead from connection management and SQL parsing. Execute multiple INSERT or COPY commands in parallel to leverage multiple cores. When bulk loading time-series data, insert in loose time order (e.g., day 1 across all servers, then day 2) rather than sequentially by server to prevent disk thrashing.
Q: How can TimescaleDB improve insert performance compared to vanilla PostgreSQL?
A: TimescaleDB enhances PostgreSQL insert performance through features like hypertables with automatic time-based chunking, which keeps recent data in memory for faster writes. It offers native compression to reduce the cost of wide rows and provides tools like parallel copy for efficient bulk loading. TimescaleDB also helps maintain appropriate chunk sizes (neither too large nor too small) to optimize memory usage and prevent unnecessary disk operations.