Predictive Learning Analytics
#HUCBMS2018
Heads of University Centres of
Biomedical Sciences 25th anniversary
conference
If you want to vote and share, log into:
https://pollev.com/bartrienties552
@DrBartRienties
Professor of Learning Analytics
A special thanks to Avinash Boroowa, Shi-Min Chua, Simon Cross, Doug Clow, Chris Edwards, Rebecca Ferguson, Mark Gaved, Christothea Herodotou, Martin
Hlosta, Wayne Holmes, Garron Hillaire, Simon Knight, Nai Li, Vicky Marsh, Kevin Mayles, Jenna Mittelmeier, Vicky Murphy, Quan Nguygen, Tom Olney, Lynda
Prescott, John Richardson, Saman Rizvi, Jekaterina Rogaten, Matt Schencks, Mike Sharples, Dirk Tempelaar, Belinda Tynan, Lisette Toetenel, Thomas
Ullmann, Denise Whitelock, Zdenek Zdrahal, and others…
Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics Toolkit for Teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58-76.
Big Data is messy!!!
Prof Paul Kirschner (OU NL)
“Learning analytics: Utopia or dystopia”, LAK 2016 conference
Learning Design is described as “a methodology for enabling
teachers/designers to make more informed decisions in how they go about
designing learning activities and interventions, which is pedagogically
informed and makes effective use of appropriate resources and
technologies” (Conole, 2012).
Assimilative Finding and
handling
information
Communication Productive Experiential Interactive/
Adaptive
Assessment
Type of activity Attending to
information
Searching for
and processing
information
Discussing
module related
content with at
least one other
person (student
or tutor)
Actively
constructing an
artefact
Applying
learning in a
real-world
setting
Applying
learning in a
simulated
setting
All forms of
assessment,
whether
continuous, end
of module, or
formative
(assessment for
learning)
Examples of
activity
Read, Watch,
Listen, Think
about, Access,
Observe,
Review, Study
List, Analyse,
Collate, Plot,
Find, Discover,
Access, Use,
Gather, Order,
Classify, Select,
Assess,
Manipulate
Communicate,
Debate, Discuss,
Argue, Share,
Report,
Collaborate,
Present,
Describe,
Question
Create, Build,
Make, Design,
Construct,
Contribute,
Complete,
Produce, Write,
Draw, Refine,
Compose,
Synthesise,
Remix
Practice, Apply,
Mimic,
Experience,
Explore,
Investigate,
Perform,
Engage
Explore,
Experiment,
Trial, Improve,
Model, Simulate
Write, Present,
Report,
Demonstrate,
Critique
Conole, G. (2012). Designing for Learning in an Open World. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151
modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016), 333-341
Open University Learning Design Initiative (OULDI)
Merging big data sets
• Learning design data (>300 modules mapped)
• VLE data
• >140 modules aggregated individual data weekly
• >37 modules individual fine-grained data daily
• Student feedback data (>140)
• Academic Performance (>140)
• Predictive analytics data (>40)
• Data sets merged and cleaned
• 111,256 students undertook these modules
Toetenel, L., Rienties, B. (2016). Analysing 157 Learning Designs using Learning Analytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical
decision-making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 981–992.
Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student
engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028.
69% of what students are
doing in a week is
determined by us, teachers!
Constructivist
Learning Design
Assessment
Learning Design
Productive
Learning Design
Socio-construct.
Learning Design
VLE Engagement
Student
Satisfaction
Student
retention
150+ modules
Week 1 Week 2 Week30
+
Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151
modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016), 333-341
Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student
engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028.
Communication
So what happens when you give
learning design visualisations to
teachers?
Toetenel, L., Rienties, B. (2016) Learning Design – creative design to visualise learning activities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning,
31(3), 233-244.
Toetenel, L., Rienties, B. (2016) Learning Design – creative design to visualise learning activities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning,
31(3), 233-244.
So what happens when you give
learning analytics data about
students to teachers?
1. How did 240 teachers within the 10
modules made use of PLA data (OUA
predictions) and visualisations to help
students at risk?
2. To what extent was there a positive
impact on students' performance and
retention when using OUA
predictions?
3. Which factors explain teachers' uses
of OUA?
Usage of OUA dashboard by participating
teachers
1
Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M., & Naydenova, G. (2017). Implementing predictive learning analytics on a large scale: the
teacher's perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, British
18
Which factors better predict pass and completion rates?
Regression analysis
Student
characteristics
Age
Gender
New/c
ontinu
ous
Disability
Ethnicity
Educat
ion
IMD
band
Best
previous
score
Sum of
previous
credits
Teacher
characteristics
Module
presentations
per teacher
Students per
module
presentation
OUA usage
module
design
Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M. (Submitted: 01-08-2017). Using Predictive Learning Analytics to Support Just-in-time
Interventions: The Teachers' Perspective Across a Large-scale Implementation.
19
Significant model (pass: χ2= 76.391, p < .001, df = 24).
Logistic regression results (pass rates)
●Nagelkerke’s R2 = .185 (model explains 18% of the
variance in passing rates)
● Correctly classified over 70% of the cases
(prediction success overall was 70.2%: 33.5 % for
not passing a module and 88.7% for passing a
module).
●Significant predictors of both pass and completion
rates:
●OUA usage (p=.006)
●Best previous module score achieved (p=.005)
● All other predictors were not significant.
Best
predictors
of pass
rates
OUA
usage
Best
previous
score
Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M. (Submitted: 01-08-2017). Using Predictive Learning Analytics to Support Just-in-time
Interventions: The Teachers' Perspective Across a Large-scale Implementation.
Conclusions and moving forwards
1. Teachers and professional development key in
world of learning analytics
2. Learning design and teachers strongly influences
student engagement, satisfaction and performance
3. Learning analytics can be quite powerful to
understand complexities of learning in- and outside
class
Conclusions and moving forwards
1. Learning analytics approaches can
help researchers and practitioners to
test and validate big and small
theoretical questions
2. I am open for any collaborations or any
wild ideas 
Predictive Learning Analytics
HUCBMS 2018
Heads of University Centres of
Biomedical Sciences 25th anniversary
conference
If you want to vote and share, log into:
https://pollev.com/bartrienties552
@DrBartRienties
Professor of Learning Analytics

Predictive Learning Analytics Professor Bart Rienties (Open University)

  • 1.
    Predictive Learning Analytics #HUCBMS2018 Headsof University Centres of Biomedical Sciences 25th anniversary conference If you want to vote and share, log into: https://pollev.com/bartrienties552 @DrBartRienties Professor of Learning Analytics
  • 2.
    A special thanksto Avinash Boroowa, Shi-Min Chua, Simon Cross, Doug Clow, Chris Edwards, Rebecca Ferguson, Mark Gaved, Christothea Herodotou, Martin Hlosta, Wayne Holmes, Garron Hillaire, Simon Knight, Nai Li, Vicky Marsh, Kevin Mayles, Jenna Mittelmeier, Vicky Murphy, Quan Nguygen, Tom Olney, Lynda Prescott, John Richardson, Saman Rizvi, Jekaterina Rogaten, Matt Schencks, Mike Sharples, Dirk Tempelaar, Belinda Tynan, Lisette Toetenel, Thomas Ullmann, Denise Whitelock, Zdenek Zdrahal, and others…
  • 3.
    Dyckhoff, A. L.,Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics Toolkit for Teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58-76.
  • 4.
    Big Data ismessy!!!
  • 5.
    Prof Paul Kirschner(OU NL) “Learning analytics: Utopia or dystopia”, LAK 2016 conference
  • 6.
    Learning Design isdescribed as “a methodology for enabling teachers/designers to make more informed decisions in how they go about designing learning activities and interventions, which is pedagogically informed and makes effective use of appropriate resources and technologies” (Conole, 2012).
  • 7.
    Assimilative Finding and handling information CommunicationProductive Experiential Interactive/ Adaptive Assessment Type of activity Attending to information Searching for and processing information Discussing module related content with at least one other person (student or tutor) Actively constructing an artefact Applying learning in a real-world setting Applying learning in a simulated setting All forms of assessment, whether continuous, end of module, or formative (assessment for learning) Examples of activity Read, Watch, Listen, Think about, Access, Observe, Review, Study List, Analyse, Collate, Plot, Find, Discover, Access, Use, Gather, Order, Classify, Select, Assess, Manipulate Communicate, Debate, Discuss, Argue, Share, Report, Collaborate, Present, Describe, Question Create, Build, Make, Design, Construct, Contribute, Complete, Produce, Write, Draw, Refine, Compose, Synthesise, Remix Practice, Apply, Mimic, Experience, Explore, Investigate, Perform, Engage Explore, Experiment, Trial, Improve, Model, Simulate Write, Present, Report, Demonstrate, Critique Conole, G. (2012). Designing for Learning in an Open World. Dordrecht: Springer. Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016), 333-341 Open University Learning Design Initiative (OULDI)
  • 9.
    Merging big datasets • Learning design data (>300 modules mapped) • VLE data • >140 modules aggregated individual data weekly • >37 modules individual fine-grained data daily • Student feedback data (>140) • Academic Performance (>140) • Predictive analytics data (>40) • Data sets merged and cleaned • 111,256 students undertook these modules
  • 10.
    Toetenel, L., Rienties,B. (2016). Analysing 157 Learning Designs using Learning Analytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical decision-making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 981–992.
  • 12.
    Nguyen, Q., Rienties,B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028. 69% of what students are doing in a week is determined by us, teachers!
  • 13.
    Constructivist Learning Design Assessment Learning Design Productive LearningDesign Socio-construct. Learning Design VLE Engagement Student Satisfaction Student retention 150+ modules Week 1 Week 2 Week30 + Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: a cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60 (2016), 333-341 Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028. Communication
  • 14.
    So what happenswhen you give learning design visualisations to teachers? Toetenel, L., Rienties, B. (2016) Learning Design – creative design to visualise learning activities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 31(3), 233-244.
  • 15.
    Toetenel, L., Rienties,B. (2016) Learning Design – creative design to visualise learning activities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 31(3), 233-244.
  • 16.
    So what happenswhen you give learning analytics data about students to teachers? 1. How did 240 teachers within the 10 modules made use of PLA data (OUA predictions) and visualisations to help students at risk? 2. To what extent was there a positive impact on students' performance and retention when using OUA predictions? 3. Which factors explain teachers' uses of OUA?
  • 17.
    Usage of OUAdashboard by participating teachers 1 Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M., & Naydenova, G. (2017). Implementing predictive learning analytics on a large scale: the teacher's perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, British
  • 18.
    18 Which factors betterpredict pass and completion rates? Regression analysis Student characteristics Age Gender New/c ontinu ous Disability Ethnicity Educat ion IMD band Best previous score Sum of previous credits Teacher characteristics Module presentations per teacher Students per module presentation OUA usage module design Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M. (Submitted: 01-08-2017). Using Predictive Learning Analytics to Support Just-in-time Interventions: The Teachers' Perspective Across a Large-scale Implementation.
  • 19.
    19 Significant model (pass:χ2= 76.391, p < .001, df = 24). Logistic regression results (pass rates) ●Nagelkerke’s R2 = .185 (model explains 18% of the variance in passing rates) ● Correctly classified over 70% of the cases (prediction success overall was 70.2%: 33.5 % for not passing a module and 88.7% for passing a module). ●Significant predictors of both pass and completion rates: ●OUA usage (p=.006) ●Best previous module score achieved (p=.005) ● All other predictors were not significant. Best predictors of pass rates OUA usage Best previous score Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., Hlosta, M. (Submitted: 01-08-2017). Using Predictive Learning Analytics to Support Just-in-time Interventions: The Teachers' Perspective Across a Large-scale Implementation.
  • 20.
    Conclusions and movingforwards 1. Teachers and professional development key in world of learning analytics 2. Learning design and teachers strongly influences student engagement, satisfaction and performance 3. Learning analytics can be quite powerful to understand complexities of learning in- and outside class
  • 21.
    Conclusions and movingforwards 1. Learning analytics approaches can help researchers and practitioners to test and validate big and small theoretical questions 2. I am open for any collaborations or any wild ideas 
  • 22.
    Predictive Learning Analytics HUCBMS2018 Heads of University Centres of Biomedical Sciences 25th anniversary conference If you want to vote and share, log into: https://pollev.com/bartrienties552 @DrBartRienties Professor of Learning Analytics

Editor's Notes

  • #8 Explain seven categories
  • #9 For each module, the learning design team together with module chairs create activity charts of what kind of activities students are expected to do in a week.
  • #10 5131 students responded – 28%, between 18-76%
  • #14 Cluster analysis of 40 modules (>19k students) indicate that module teams design four different types of modules: constructivist, assessment driven, balanced, or socio-constructivist. The LAK paper by Rienties and colleagues indicates that VLE engagement is higher in modules with socio-constructivist or balanced variety learning designs, and lower for constructivist designs. In terms of learning outcomes, students rate constructivist modules higher, and socio-constructivist modules lower. However, in terms of student retention (% of students passed) constructivist modules have lower retention, while socio-constructivist have higher. Thus, learning design strongly influences behaviour, experience and performance. (and we believe we are the first to have mapped this with such a large cohort).
  • #20 Same results for completion rates.