Project Management: A Short Introduction and History
Project Management: A Short Introduction and History
Project Management
A Short Introduction and History
Left mouse-click or enter to go to next slide Right mouse-click or backspace to go to previous slide ESC to exit this module
This Unit of Instruction was crafted by Robert Hugg For Minnesota State University, Mankato Urban and Regional Studies Institute - 2004
PM contains many techniques flexible Adaptable techniques that are industry specific Techniques work in some industries and not others PM techniques evolve within the philosophy
Milestone: A significant task which represents a key accomplishment within the project. Typically requires special attention and control.
Urban and Regional Studies Institute 10
(ALAP) do not have specific dates associated with them. Setting these constraints allows you to start tasks as early as possible or as late as possible with the task ending before the project finish, given other constraints and task dependencies in the schedule. Inflexible constraints such as Must Start On (MSO) and Must Finish On (MFO) require an associated date, which controls the start or finish date of the task. These constraints are useful when you need to make your schedule take into account external factors, such as the availability of equipment or resources, deadlines, contract milestones, and start and finish dates.
13
14
15
16
CPM (Critical Path Method) introduced by US industry in 1958 (DuPont Corporation and Remington-Rand)
Industry needed to control costs and schedules in manufacturing Considers only completion of a preceding required task
17
flowers and edging around them tasks required to complete this project:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Mark utilities Dig Holes Buy trees Buy flowers Plant trees Plant flowers Buy edging Install edging
time or money This list does not reflect task relationships This list is a simple sequence of logical events This list does not provide an easy project snapshot Hard to see conflicts
18
7
Buy Edging
3
Buy Trees
1
Start Mark Utilities
2
Dig Holes
5
Plant Trees
6
Plant Flowers
8
Install Edging Finish
4
Buy Flowers
19
Mark Utilities
Dig Holes Buy Trees Buy Flowers Plant Trees Plant Flowers Buy Edging Install Edging TOTALS
3
2 .5 .5 2 1 .5 1
3
1 .5 .5 1 .5 .5 .5
0
100 50 50 100 50 25 25
0
200 50 50 200 100 25 50
10
400
675
NOTE: Shaded areas are concurrent tasks that are completed along the timeline- they contribute to overall cost but not overall duration Urban and Regional Studies Institute 20
The derived dates are estimates (educated guess) The analysis yields a best-case date, worst-case
date, and due (derived expected) date
Urban and Regional Studies Institute
21
ALL PERT dates are estimates (ALWAYS) Preferred choice in Social & Behavioral Sciences
Urban and Regional Studies Institute 22
Impact on shared resources (with other projects) Impact on other projects (resources, timing) Impact on quality or reliability
24
25
Relies on clearly defined tasks and goals Provides estimates, not guarantees
Urban and Regional Studies Institute 26
PM Today Necessary?
Frustration with cost & schedule overruns Frustration with reliability of production estimates Management challenges exist today:
Only 44% of projects are completed on time On average, projects are 189% over-budget 70% of completed projects do not perform as expected 30% of projects are canceled before completion On average, projects are 222% longer than expected
These statistics were compiled by an independent monitoring group, The Standish Group, and represent the US national average for 1998
27
PM Overview
Valuable tools for planning and tracking
A good way to explore what if before a project ever begins How much it could cost - money What it could entail tasks How long it could take - time Probabilities of success - risks How much resource needed people & equipment
A good way to get and stay organized Provides estimates, not guarantees
Urban and Regional Studies Institute
28
M. - Quantitative Analysis for Management, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon Inc., 1982 US National Performance Survey, The Standish Group, 1998 Verma, Vijay K., Managing the Project Team: The Human Aspects of Project Management, Philadelphia: PMI, 1997 Wiest, Jerome D., and Levy, Ferdinand K., A Management Guide to PERT/CPM, New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, 1974
29
30