Entrepreneurship Education in The 21 Century: From Legitimization To Leadership
Entrepreneurship Education in The 21 Century: From Legitimization To Leadership
Entrepreneurship Education in The 21 Century: From Legitimization To Leadership
by
Entrepreneurial Perspective
Entrepreneurship is an integrated concept that permeates an individuals business in an innovative manner. It is this perspective that has revolutionized the way business is conducted at every level and in every country.
2,200 courses 1,600 schools 277 endowed positions 44 refereed academic journals over 100 established centers $440 million in wealth
(over 75% accrued since 1987)
~ Katz, 2003
Solomon, Duffy, and Tarabishy (2002) conducted one of the most comprehensive empirical analyses on entrepreneurship education.
A core objective of entrepreneurship education is that it differentiates from typical business education.
USASBE
Model programs include undergraduate programs, graduatelevel programs, innovative pedagogy, and specialized programs.
Vesper (1999) warned that there was unfinished business left from th Century. He saw this in the 20 terms of legitimacy, paradigms, content, research, autonomy, and permanence.
How many full departments of entrepreneurship exist? How many young faculty are being granted tenure for their research and teaching in entrepreneurship?
How many deans are rising from the ranks of entrepreneurship faculty? How many business schools rank the pure entrepreneurship journals on their A list?
Our collective leadership must inspire the next generation of entrepreneurship faculty to take our discipline to the next plateau.
Entrepreneurships rightful place in business schools of st Century will be one the 21 of leadership in curriculum, research and faculty.
Respect
for the mainstream entrepreneurship journals.
The entrepreneurship discipline must develop faculty. We have pioneered an entire academic field that has grown exponentially in 30 years! Why should we stop short now?
only 21 percent of the respondents indicated they use distance-learning technologies in their entrepreneurship education courses.
(Solomon, et al. 2002)
Our classrooms became infatuated with the drive for liquidity, fast cash, quick exits. We pursued an investment mentality rather than facilitating the search for an enduring enterprise!
have argued for (and financially supported) the integration of entrepreneurs (Es) into the classroom setting with academics (As).
As entrepreneurship has become more legitimized in our universities, there is a danger of diluting its real meaning!
There seems to be a real use and abuse of this term for purposes other than enhancing the field of entrepreneurship education. As entrepreneurship educators, we must be guardians of the true meaning and intent of the word entrepreneurship.
Too many faculty pursue tenure as their only goal. The challenges of entrepreneurship are for later in their career.
What message is being conveyed in our classrooms? Students should embrace risk while faculty pursue security! It is a real dilemma that exists in academia!
Provosts, and Deans are continuously changing among universities. With those position changes come values and vision changes.
Critics argue that our field is weak because many EPrograms hinge on one persons drive and determination.
A Call To Action!
A Call for Leadership!
(Our Challenge)
if we try!
Remember, the journey of 10,000 miles always starts with one step!
The emerging generation of entrepreneurship educators must avoid the paradigm paralysis that has consumed so many business disciplines.
PARADIGM PARALYSIS
As entrepreneurship educators we must have the same innovative drive and risk taking propensity that is expected from entrepreneurship students.