0% found this document useful (1 vote)
515 views31 pages

6 Sigma Projects Presentation

Six Sigma is a set of tools and processes aimed at reducing defects and variability. It originated at Motorola in the 1980s and was later adopted by General Electric. When Motorola implemented Six Sigma, they saw significant improvements such as an 84% reduction in costs of quality and $11 billion in manufacturing cost savings. General Electric also saw success with Six Sigma, including 12-18% capacity improvements and $750 million in savings. Six Sigma can be applied in various industries and organizations to improve processes and reduce costs.

Uploaded by

bellbesh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
515 views31 pages

6 Sigma Projects Presentation

Six Sigma is a set of tools and processes aimed at reducing defects and variability. It originated at Motorola in the 1980s and was later adopted by General Electric. When Motorola implemented Six Sigma, they saw significant improvements such as an 84% reduction in costs of quality and $11 billion in manufacturing cost savings. General Electric also saw success with Six Sigma, including 12-18% capacity improvements and $750 million in savings. Six Sigma can be applied in various industries and organizations to improve processes and reduce costs.

Uploaded by

bellbesh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

SIX SIGMA OVERVIEW

Six Sigma

Six Sigma refers to tools, processes and cultures made famous by Motorola and General Electric in the 1980s and are aimed at reducing variability and defects.

Six Sigma Origins

Motorola deployed Six Sigma Methodology in 80s In1981, Motorola set out to improve the quality of their products and services tenfold. In 1988, accepted Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, and began the Six Sigma Quality movement.

Motorola Experience

Between 1983-87: spent $70 Million on quality related education. Productivity increased average of 12.3%/yr. Cost of Quality reduced by more than 84%. 99.7% of in-process defects eliminated. $11 Billion in manufacturing costs saved. Average annual compounded growth rate of 17% in earnings, revenues and stock prices.

Six Sigma Applications

Manufacturing , Service, Chemical, Financial.. High or low volume. Thousands, Millions or Billions in Revenue. Even Non-Profit Organizations.

GE Experience

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

GE Experience

Capacity improvements of 12-18%. Rise in operating margin to 16.7%. $750 millions in savings.

GE plastics

Reduced color variation in plastic products. Raised quality from 2 sigma to 4.9 sigma over 4 months. Saved $400,000 a year for one plant. (ref GE Way). In 1996, first year of Six Sigma deployment, GE Plastics achieved benefits of $20 million

GE Medical Systems

Developed a new Ultrasound technology which allows medical personnel to more Cleary diagnose risk factors contributing to stroke. Technology became available two years earlier than otherwise possible, due to GE's Design for Six Sigma deployment.

Other Six Sigma Industry Leaders

Boeing, IBM, Bombardier, Asea Brown Boveri, DuPont, Kodak, Compaq and Texas Instruments. GMAC Mortgage, Citibank, JP Morgan and Cendant Mortgage.

Integral MQS Achievements


Sample of Six Sigma Projects Implemented

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

11

Project 1: Optimization of Calcium Addition

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

12

Project 1: Optimization of Calcium Addition


Opportunity Statement: (Problem Definition)

EFS loss of 1,481,544 L.E per year due to the uses of the heated Calcium-wire after Calcium optimization. The process current sigma level is 2.15

Goal Statement:
Reduce defects percentage from 25% to 11% by July 2006. Reduce revenue losses by 740,772 L.E. Improve process Sigma level to 3.69 sigma.

Project 2: Reduce Casting Time

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

14

Project 2: Reduce Casting Time


Opportunity Statement: (Problem
Currently the Variable operation process current sigma level is 2.49, if it increased to 3; So there will be 0.51 increase in sigma level.
Definition)

Goal Statement
Achieve the average process time Save annual revenue loss of LE 20,000,000. Increase productivity. Improve On-Time Delivery. Improve Employee Morale. Improve Flexibility & Reduce Production Interruption.

Project 3: Width Drop Defect


(Project Charter)

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

16

Project 3: (Project Charter) Width Drop Defect


Business Case: The Width Drop defect beside causing an annual revenue loss of 6,704,422.50 L.E., it causes rework and production disturbance and it might cause a delay in finished product delivery. By reducing this defect, the company will improve its financial performance, increase productivity and deliver finished product on time.
Project Goal :
Reduce

Opportunity Statement: Currently, in EFS, there are 0.62% defective Coils due to width drop after the hot strip Mill process. This represents a revenue loss of 6,704,422.50 L.E. per year. The process current sigma level is 3.76

Project Scope:
HSM Operation Process: 1. HSM: Start with slabs and ends with Hot Rolled Coils (HRC). 2. The Project scope is to control the width drop which occurred in the Hot Strip Mill.
Team Selection:
To

the cost of width drop defect by 6,033,979 LE Improve process Sigma level from 3.76 to 4.54 sigma. Improve Delivery on time. Reduce production interruption. Improve employee morale. Increase Customer satisfaction.
Time Schedule & Project Plan:
Activity From

Define Phase Measure Phase Analyze Phase Improve Phase Control Phase

15/01/2006 15/02/2006 01/05/2006 15/05/2006 01/07/2006

15/02/2006 30/04/2006 15/05/2006 30/06/2006 10/07/2006

Dr.Gamal Megahed Nabil Douban Ahmed Nabil Usama Ahmed Mohammed Awad Mohammed Ibrahim Ahmed Attala Niraj Singh

Sponsor Black Belt Adhoc Member Member Member Member Member

TD Manager Financial Manager HSM Process Engineer HSM Production Eng. Quality Control Eng. Automation Engineer SKP in Charge

Improve Sales Order cycle and Scrap Products Due To Expiry

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

18

1- Definition of key terms


Return Goods:
of its contents.

The Returned Products which is stayed on the customer shelf until expiration or any kind of defect.

Returns Invoices:

The invoices which are totally returned, the customer did not accept any

Partial R. Invoices: Contract :

The invoices which are partially returned, the customer accepted some of its contents and returned the others. Local or exportation tenders.

Sales : The Net sales (Total Sales Returns) Sale order cycle: From Salesman visits schedule, physical visit, order taking, order follow-up, order delivery to on shelf products follow-up Scrap : The Executed Finished Products Scrape due to expiry date: The scraped products due to exceeding the expiration date at the customer place. Rework: The needed work on returned products to reuse them Customers: Pharmacies, Distributors, and others like hospitals, Health insurance, Etc.

2- Project Selection
Work Break Down Structure Sales Net Sales Other Customer Distributors Pharmacies

Returns
Distributors Pharmacies Other customers

Invoice Returns

Return Goods
Scrape Rework

Due to Expiration Others At Pharmacy At Company

Returned Products
Returned products

Contract R. partially

Contract R. Invoice

Contract Returns

Invoice R. partially

Invoice Returns

Returned Goods

Why is this so important?


Sales Transaction % 2006
6.0% 2.0% Category Net Sales Samples Returns

92.0%

The Total returns represent 6 % from The Total Sales while the samples represent 2 %

Returned Goods (A Closer Look)


92%
Sales Samples Returns

6%

2%

100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%

18%

41% 7% 11% 21% 0.00%

Contract R. Contract R. Contract R Invoice R. partially Invoice Partially

Invoice R.

Return Goods

Facts
Pareto Chart of Customer Type ( Returned Goods Units 2004 - 2006)
100 2000000 80 1500000 60 1000000 40 20 0

500000

0 Customer Type Count Percent Cum %

Pharmacies 1221801 56.8 56.8

Distributers 910889 42.4 99.2

Other 16881 0.8 100.0

Almost 57% of Returned goods are from the pharmacies

Percent

Count

Business Case

The defect of returned products based on expiry date cause loss of about 3,000,000 LE per year. The current sale order form not adequate for sales man requirements.

Opportunity Statement

Currently ,the returned products represent 18% from all returned Products. But 82 % from them goes to scrap This represent loss of about 2.5 - 3 Million - L.E. per year.

Facts

The Company gives about 2 % form sales value as A Samples , so there is an opportunity to reuse the Returned products if we have control on the products in the market

Project Scope

The Sales Cycle From Getting the Customer Order until The Expired product Execution

Project Objectives

1- Reduce the Expired products by 1,000,000 L.E. per year. 2- Improve process sigma level from 0.6 to 1.6 Sigma. 3- Improve the return cycle. 4- Improve Sales order cycle 5- Increase the customer satisfaction.

Project Charter
Business Case The defect of returned products Based on expiry date cause loss of about 3,000,000 LE per year.
Project Goal 1- Reduce the cost of returned products by 1,000,000 L.E. per year. 2- Improve process sigma level from 0.6 to 1.6 Sigma. 3- Improve the return cycle. 4- Increase the customer satisfaction. Time Schedule Define 2 Weeks Measure 2 Weeks Analyze 2 Weeks Improve 1 Month Control 1 Month Opportunity Statement Currently ,the returned products due to expiry date represent 18% defect from all returned Products The Company Scrape about 82% from them. This represent loss of about 3 M L.E. per year. The current sigma level 0.6 Project Scope The Sales From Getting the Customer Order until The Expired product Execution.

Thank You

Integral Management and Quality Solutions

31

You might also like