Project Planning and Proposal Development: Case Study I
Project Planning and Proposal Development: Case Study I
Project Planning and Proposal Development: Case Study I
2.1 Background
Project planning
Idea, idea, idea Identifying what, why, how
Proposal development
Project summary Project description budget
Proposal submission
Background
Structural analysis
Structural synthesis
-3
Background
Project scope
Background
Faculty Early Career Development Program 5-year with $400K Emphasize integration of research and education Industry matching funds to encourage industry collaboration
Background
Project summary
1999 competition (rules slightly vary) (4+1) year project with ~$420K NSF CAREER Award + contract with Toyota 1 MS and 3 PhD students in 4 years
Outline
Background Information gathering Project planning Proposal development Proposal submission Concluding remarks
Program announcement
Information gathering
How important within/outside of the field? PI(s) qualified? Original and creative? Well planned? Access to necessary resources?
Information gathering
Promotes teaching training, and learning? Enhance infrastructure of research and education? Disseminated broadly? Benefit to society?
Outline
Background Information gathering Project planning Proposal development Proposal submission Concluding remarks
Project planning
Problem must be new and important Approach must be innovative and effective Must meet merit review criteria
Project planning
Structural products are made of numerous parts Product shape decomposed to part shapes Small parts need many joints that waken structure Large parts are strong but too costly to produce What is optimal decomposition?
Project planning
Identify What-Why-How
intellectual merit broader impacts Never done or not well done before Research questions Approach to research questions
Project planning
Project planning
Why it is important?
Bad decomposition affects subsequent part design; cost of re-work is enormous Best practice not known for hybrids, fuel cells, and electric vehicles
Project planning
1) transform the problem as graph decomposition 2) solve by using structural analysis and optimization
1 3 6 4
3
1 6 4
2 0
2 0
Project planning
Literature review
Utilize on-line resources Be careful -- faulty statements on the state-of-theart can kill the proposal
2. Project Planning and Proposal Development I - 18
Project planning
Structural synthesis
Many papers on single-part structure Many papers on multi-part structure with given part boundary No papers on synthesis of part boundary considering structural performances Many papers on improving given part designs for easy manufacturing Many papers on improving given part designs for easy assembly No papers on synthesis of part boundary considering manufacturing and assembly costs
2. Project Planning and Proposal Development I - 19
Project planning
Industry collaboration
Encouraged by CAREER via matching fund system (existed in 1999; not anymore) Industry endorsement letter can be in Appendix Works if practical case studies are desired IP issues among university, government, and company must be sorted out in advance. Who will own the rights to inventions?
2. Project Planning and Proposal Development I - 20
Project planning
Submitted in July 1998. Proposal turned down in March 1999. Submitted in July 1999. Proposal got through in March 2000. Endorsement letter for the 2nd submission
Outline
Background Information gathering Project planning Proposal development Proposal submission Concluding remarks
Proposal development
statement of objective method to be employed separate statements of (1) intellectual merit and (2) broader impacts
Proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria will be returned without review.
Proposal development
Typical format
Section 1: Objective and motivation (what + why & how) Section 2: Literature review (why) Section 3: Proposed approach (how) Section 4: Preliminary results (how) Section 5: Schedule and milestones (how)
An anonymous NSF Program Director said In page 1, tell me what, how, and why. In the rest of 14 pages, convince me that I can trust you.
Proposal development
Objective
Synthesis of multi-component structural assembly Bad decomposition affects subsequent part design; cost of re-work is enormous Best practice not known for hybrids, fuel cells, and electric vehicles No papers on synthesis of part boundary considering structural performances No papers on synthesis of part boundary considering manufacturing and assembly costs
2. Project Planning and Proposal Development I - 26
Motivation
Literature review
Proposal development
Proposed approach
1) transform the problem as graph decomposition 2) solve by using structural analysis and optimization
Proposal development
Final polish-up
Ask a senior colleague in somewhat distant area to review A anonymous multi-million $ NSF proposal winner said In the end, I asked a high school senior to read the proposals to make sure logic is perfectly clear
Outline
Background Information gathering Project planning Proposal development Proposal submission Concluding remarks
Proposal submission in hard copy form is rare Electronic submission more common
Outline
Background Information gathering Project planning Proposal development Proposal submission Concluding remarks
Detailed guideline and clear review criteria Good proposal = excellent idea + what-why-how Plan well, then writing is a snap
Concluding remarks