ECS1370 How To Solve Profit Max Problems
ECS1370 How To Solve Profit Max Problems
Solving edit Master subtitle style Click tomicroeconomics problems using algebra and calculus
4/14/12
Up until now we have used graphical analysis to solve microeconomics problems. These problems can be solved using algebra and calculus. These slides show how to do so.
4/14/12
Contents
1. 2.
Solve profit maximisation problems Solve constrained maximisation problems. Each section contains worked examples, past exam questions, or questions form this years mid-tem-test.
4/14/12
4/14/12
4/14/12
Find quantity produced that maximises the firms profit. If the firm has market power then you also have to find the price that maximises profit. There are 2 tricky bits in these problems: you are never given the profit function itself, only the demand function and a cost function (total or marginal).
1.
2.
Step 1: use the definition of profit: Total revenue-total cost. (TR-TC) Step 2: If the demand function is given as Q(P), invert it to obtain P(Q). Step 3: calculate the total revenue using the inverted demand function, TR=P(Q)*Q.
Note: the reason for doing 2) and 3) is that TC is always a function of Q, never of P. If you dont invert Q(P), you will end up with a profit function with 2 unknown variables, P and Q, and only 1 equation to so
4/14/12
QD = 6500 100*P
C 2 + Q 2 ()7 =
2 Q 2 0 0
You have to differentiate with respect to P and Q, equalise to 0 and solve for P and Q:
The result is complete non-sense: the firm produces 0 and charges 32.5. 4/14/12
In this case the price is given, and the profit maximising quantity is given by P=MC. If the MC is given in the exercise, you dont need to differentiate the cost function Example of this type of exercise: Mid-term test 1, part 2, question 2
4/14/12
Invert the demand functions, and set up the profit function: QD = 10 - 0.04*P, and C(Q)=250+Q^2/150 QD=500-5*P, and C(Q)=350+Q^3/50 QD=400-7*P, and C(Q)=50+Q^2/120 QD=200-4*P, and
1.
2.
3.
4. 4/14/12
2 10 Q 10 *Q 2Q Q 1)P = and Q ) = ( 250 0.04 0.04 150 2 3 500 Q 500 *Q Q Q 2)P = and Q ) = ( 350 5 5 50 2 2 400 Q 10 *Q Q Q 3)P = and Q ) = ( 50 7 0.04 120 2 200 Q 200 *Q 2Q Q 4)P = and Q ) = ( 250 4 4 150
The maximum (or minimum) of a function is the point where its first derivative is equal to 0. The maximum of a function is the point where its first derivative is 0 and its second derivative is negative. In practice, when the exercises involve profit maximisation, the demand and costs functions given will always produce a profit function that has a maximum. 4/14/12
n n n n n
df(x)/dx=0 df (x)/dx=5 df (x)/dx=3*16*x16-1 df(x)/dx= 5+0 (SUM RULE) df (x)/dx= 5* (3*x16) + (3*16*x16-1)*(5*x) (PRODUCT RULE)
4/14/12
Step 1: invert the demand function if necessary Step 2: set up the profit function Step 3: differentiate the profit function with respect to Q, or take the derivative provided in the exercise Step 4: equalise the derivative of the profit function to 0 and solve for Q*. Q* is the profit maximising quantity.
4/14/12
Warning: Step 2 has to be adapted to take into account specific profit maximising cases.
Example: A monopolist produces in 2 distinct markets, and faces 2 distinct demand functions.
In this case, the total revenue will be the sum of the revenues in both markets. The profit function will then be:
(Q1, Q2 ) = P (Q1)* Q1+ P2 (Q2 )* Q C (Q1, Q2 ) 1 2
4/14/12
Example:Monopolist
P = 120 0.02Q where Q is weekly production and P is price, measured in cents per unit. The firms cost function is given by C = 60Q + 25,000. Assume that the firm maximizes profits. What is the level of production, price, and total profit per week?
4/14/12
The profit-maximizing output is found by setting marginal revenue equal to marginal cost.
Answer
Step 1 (invert demand function): Given a linear demand curve in inverse form, P = 120 0.02Q, we dont need to invert the demand function.
Step 2 (set-up profit function): TR=PxQ, this implies TR= (120-0.02Q)Q=120Q-0.02Q2. TC is given in the exercise. So the profit function is:
d/dQ= 120-0.04Q-60=60-0.04Q.
This implies MC=MR because the derivative of the profit function is the sum of 2 derivatives MR and MC. Setting MR = MC to determine the profit-maximizing quantity: 120 0.04Q = 60, or Q = 1500.
4/14/12
4/14/12
Answer
Step 1: The demand is in inverted form, i.e., P(Q) and not Q(P). Step 2: set up the profit function for firm 1
TR= Pxq1= 300 3(q1+q2)q1=300-3q123q1q2 TC is given by C(q1)= 30q1+1.5q12. So your profit function is: =300-3q12-3q1q2-(30q1+1.5q12)
4/14/12
answer
Step 3: differentiate the profit function with respect to q1 Step 4: equalise profit function to =, i.e., MC=MR
answer
We know that both firms have the same cost function so we know that firm 2 has the same reaction function as firm 1: q2=(270-3q2)/9 In a Cournot problem, the equilibrium is found by equalising the 2 reaction functions which means you have to solve a system of 2 equations, for 2 unknowns (q1, and q2). If you do so you find that q1=q2=22.5. Step 5: replace equilibrium quantities in demand function to find the price.
P=300-3(22.5+22.5)=165
4/14/12
4/14/12
4/14/12
Consumer problem
What are the quantities of goods X and Y that maximise utility and are affordable, given the consumers budget? Tricky bit 1: the budget constraint is not given. Tricky bit 2: the quantities found have to satisfy 2 conditions: 1. Maximise utility 2. Be affordable . Tricky bit 3: This maximisation involves 2 variables, i.e., X and Y. This means partial differentiation. It would be much easier to differentiate with respect to only 1 variable.
4/14/12
Px*X+py*Y=I Px is the price of good X and py is the price of good Y. Both prices are known. I is income.
4/14/12
2.
3.
U(X,Y) is the utility obtained from consuming goods X and Y. X and Y are quantities. The only unknowns in this system are X and Y, and since both appear in both equations, it should be possible to find a solution using algebra. Maximisation means finding the derivative and setting it to 0.
4/14/12
4/14/12
4/14/12
Problem: Choose the number of workers and the number of capital units that minimise costs and allow the production of a chosen level of output. Tricky bit 1: the cost function is never given, only the price of capital and the wage. Tricky bit 2: the number of workers and the number of capital units must satisfy 2 conditions:
Result in the lowest possible cost of production Allow the firm to produce a chosen level of output
1.
2.
3.
Tricky bit 3: there are 2 variables, which means partial 4/14/12 differentiation
This is easy. Cost equals: price of capital * number of units of capital used in production+price of labour * number of workers employed. Total cost=pk*K+pw*L
4/14/12
Total cost=pk*K+pw*L Production function: Q (K,L)=K1/2*L1/2 Note: the bar above Q indicates that Q is constant.
4/14/12
Step 1: set up the budget constraint or the cost function Step 2: rewrite the budget constraint or the production function so that you have only one variable and the constant in the right-hand side of the equation. Step 3: replace the variable found in step 2 in the function to be maximised (total cost or utility function). This function now has only one variable and constants on the right-hand side . Step 4: differentiate the function found in step 3, equalise to 0, and solve for the variable. Or use the derivative given. Step 5: replace the value of the variable found in step 4 into the budget constraint or production function.
4/14/12
The production function for a product is given by Q=100*K*L. If the price of capital is $120, and the price of labour is $30, what is the minimum cost of producing 1000 units of output?
4/14/12
4/14/12