Functionpoints 160526103046
Functionpoints 160526103046
www.luxoft.com
Introduction
Svetlana Mukhina
ICAgile ICP, ICP-ATF, ICP-BVA, PSM I, CSPO
https://www.linkedin.com/in/
svetlanamukhina
www.luxoft.com https://www.facebook.com/
Theoretical information on
Function Points
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Group
Estimating the Project
Change People
RFC project
team
Effort Critical
man- Resources
hour
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
History
• Function Point Analysis was developed first by Allan J. Albrecht in the mid 1970s
• In 1986 the International Function Point User Group (IFPUG) was set up
• Since 1987 membership in IFPUG has grown from 100 members to 600 members in 1997.
• In less than six years conference attendance has grown from 125 in 1988 to over 300 by
1997.
• Examination of IFPUG clearly indicates that the majority of its is members are from North
America
• There are numerous affiliate organizations of IFPUG. There are affiliate organizations in
Italy, France, Germany, Austria, India, The Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and several other
countries.
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
Vocabulary – Functional and Non-Functional
Requirements
Functional (Include)
• Data Transfer (Input customer data, send control signal, send transactions
• from one system to another)
• Data Transformation (Calculate bank interest; derive average temperature; use billing data to produce
invoice totals)
• Data Storage (Store customer order; record temperature over time; store control parameters to drive data)
• Data Retrieval (List current employees; retrieve satellite position; display a report of employee dependents)
Non-Functional (Exclude)
• Quality Constraints (Usability, Reliability, Efficiency, Portability)
• Organizational Constraints (locations for operations, target hardware, compliance to standards)
• Environmental Constraints (interoperability, security, privacy, safety)
• Implementation constraints (development language, delivery schedule)
www.luxoft.com
Advantages and Disadvantages of Function Point
Analysis
• Function Points can be used to size software • Function points are not a very good measure when
applications accurately. sizing maintenance efforts (fixing problems) or when
• FP can be counted by different people, at trying to understand performance issues
different times, to obtain the same measure • When maintenance programming is done by one or
within a reasonable margin of error two individuals, individual skill sets become a major
• FP can be estimated by proxy factor when measuring this type of work
• FP is easily understood by non-technical • Development team don’t take part in estimation
users
• FP can be used to determine whether a tool,
a language, an environment, is more
productive when compared with others
• Low risk of "inflation” comparing to lines of
code or story points methods
• LOC measures are not useful during early
project phases where estimating the number
of lines of code that will be delivered is
challenging.
• FP can be derived from requirements
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Group
www.luxoft.com
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Grou
Process of Function Point Estimation
Determine
the counting Identify and
Gather
scope, classify the Calculate the Document
available Report the
boundaries, base functional the Function
documentati result
functional functional size Points
on
user components
requirements
Application Boundary
An application boundary is a conceptual interface between the software under study and
its users.
• Scope of a project could include multiple applications.
• A functional size would be calculated for each affected application, in perspective to its
boundary, thereby producing its own count
• All affected application counts would be compiled to produce the total project count.
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
Types of Count
Functionality
(ability to) VS Lines of code
Logically
grouped stores Databases or
of data (data in tables
a form)
Elementary
process Physical
(complete transactions
flow, e.g. (screens)
www.luxoft.com
wizard)
from David Consulting Group
Application
External Interface File (EIF) is a
user recognizable group of logically
Internal Logical File (ILF) related data or control information
Data which is resides within the which is referenced by the application
application boundary and which being measured, but maintained
is maintained (added, changed, within the boundary of another
deleted, updated) by the application. It is identified as an ILF in
application another application(s)
Inputs (EIs)
Outputs (EOs/EQs)
• Set time
• • Alarm
Set alarm
• • Sound(Music/ Radio/Buzzer)
Set type of alarm (radio, buzz) Set radio station
• • Display Time
Set volume of radio
• Set am/fm
• Set Snooze
• On/Off alarm
The number of ILFs, EIFs and their relative functional complexity determine the contribution
of the data functions to the functional size.
Each ILF and EIF will have an individual contribution based upon its functional complexity, to
the total number of function points for data function contribution to the project functional
size.
Assign each identified ILF and EIF a functional complexity based upon the number of data
element types (DETs) and record element types (RETs) associated with the ILF or EIF.
Application
Internal Logical File (ILF)
External Interface File (EIF)
RET - A record element type (RET) is
a user recognizable subgroup of data RETs
elements within an ILF or EIF DETs
DET is a unique user DETs
recognizable, non-repeated DETs
attribute
www.luxoft.com
Function Point Counting Weights
Type Low Avg High Total
www.luxoft.com
ILF and EIF Complexity
Matrix
RETs 1-19 20-50 51+
DETs DETs DETs
1 Low Low Avg
2-5 Low Avg High
6+ Avg High High
EI Complexity
Matrix
FTRs 1-4 5-15 16+
EO and EQ* Complexity DETs DETs DETs
Matrix 0-1 Low Low Avg
FTRs 1-5 6-19 20+
DETs DETs DETs 2 Low Avg High
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
Exercise #2 Results
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Grou
External Input (EI) – an elementary process that processes data or control information sent from
outside the boundary
Words that suggest EIs: Add, Make Inactive, Allocate, Modify, Assign, Record, Associate, Remove,
Change, Reset, Create, Delete, Import, Reverse, Set, Undo, Update, Upload, Withdraw;
External Inquiry (EQ) – is an elementary process that sends data or control information outside
the boundary (using data retrieval only)
Words That Suggest EQs: Browse Display Enquire Extract Inquire List Pick List View
External Output (EO) – is an elementary process that sends data or control information outside
the boundary and includes additional processing beyond that of an external inquiry.
Words That Suggest EOs: Adjust Export Generate Notify Print Report Summary
www.luxoft.com
from David Consulting Group
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Grou
Transactional Functions
Application
Internal Logical File (ILF) EO External Interface File
(EIF)
RET - A record element type (RET) is
a user recognizable subgroup of data
elements within an ILF or EIF EI RETs
DETs
DET is a unique user
DETs
recognizable, non-repeated
DETs
attribute
EO
EQ
EI = External Input
EO = External Output
EQ = External Inquiry
User
www.luxoft.com
Exercise #3 – Counting Application Primary Processes and Group
Adopted from David Consulting
Data
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Grou
Exercise #3 – Results
www.luxoft.com
Adopted from David Consulting Group
GSCs are non-functional (technical) factors that can be applied to the unadjusted size
measure to get an adjusted functional size measure. The intent is to capture the effect of
each driver on the development life cycle environment. The value adjustment factor looks at
14 general system characteristics:
Data Distributed
Performance Heavily Used Transaction
Communicati Data or
Objectives Configuration Rate
on Processing
www.luxoft.com
Determine Value Adjustment Factor
Formula: VAF=(TDI*0.01)+0.65
If the functional project count was 100 fps, and the VAF was 1.1, then the adjusted count
would be 110 fps.
Adjusted Function Points = Functional (Unadjusted) FP x
VAF
www.luxoft.com
Check List (process) for Counting Function Points
Gather available documentation
Determine the counting scope, boundaries and identify functional user requirements
Function Point Analysis Quiz and additional materials (for Luxoft Employees only) will
be provided in follow-up email
http://www.softwarevalue.com/news/training/ - trainings
www.luxoft.com
Agile Events
Trainings: ICAgile Agile Team Facilitation – 30/06-01/07 in Kiev and 20/07-21/07 in Moscow
http://www.luxoft-training.ru/kurs/icagile_icp_agile_team_facilitation_icagile_icp-atf.html
Webinar:
Что такое коучинг, чем коучинг не является и что такое Agile коучинг https
://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/6313717198259291652?source=webinar
Встречи:
www.luxoft.com