Chapter 6
Chapter 6
1/23
Introduction
2/23
Sources of data
3/23
Secondary Sources of Data
• Secondary data means data that are already
available i.e., they refer to the data which
have already been collected and analyzed by
some one else.
• Secondary data are collected by others and
used by others.
• Any data that has been collected earlier for
some other purpose are secondary data in
the hands of an individual who is using
them.
4/23
Collection of Secondary Data
5/23
Collection of Secondary Data
Books, magazines and news papers
Reports and publications of various
organizations
Reports of research scholars in
different fields
Public records and statistics
Historical documents and other
sources of published information.
6/23
Advantages of Secondary Data
1. Economical
2. Saves Time
3. Improves an understanding of
the problem
4. Used as a basis for comparison
with the primary data that have
been collected.
5. Familiarity with secondary data
indicates gaps in knowledge.
7/23
Limitations of Secondary Data
9/23
2. Relevance/suitability of the data
• Relevance means that the data
available must fit the requirements of
the problem.
• This would cover several aspects
– Unit of measurement should be the same
as that in the problem at hand.
– The concepts used should be the same as
are envisaged in the problem.
– The data should not be obsolete.
10/23
3.Reliability of the data
12/23
5. Sufficiency
• The data should be sufficient.
sufficient
• If the data are inadequate, then
compliance with the preceding
requirements will be vain.
13/23
Primary Data
14/23
Advantages of Primary Data
1.Greater details
2.More accurate
3. As it involves definitions of terms and
units used, it enhances the
investigators’ understanding of the
meaning of units in which data are
recorded.
4. It indicates schedule, the procedure
used in selecting the sample and size
of the sample.
15/23
Methods of Primary Data Collection
16/23
Methods of Primary Data Collection
17/23
Methods of Primary Data Collection
18/23
1. The Questionnaire
19/23
The advantages
1. Lower costs
2. Better samples
3. Standardization
4. Respondent privacy (anonymity)
5. It is free from the bias of the interviewers,
answers are in respondents own words.
6. Respondents have adequate time to give
well thought out answers.
7. Respondents, who are not easily
approachable, can also be reached
conveniently.
20/23
Disadvantages
1. Non-returns
2. Misinterpretation
3. Validity problems.
4. It can be used only when respondents are
educated and cooperating.
4. The control over the questionnaire may be
lost once it is sent.
5. There is inbuilt inflexibility because of the
difficulty of amending the approach once
questionnaires have been dispatched.
6. It is the slowest of all.
21/23
Contents of a questionnaire
22/23
The cover letter
• It should explain to the respondent the
purpose of the survey and motivate him/her
to reply truthfully and quickly.
• If possible, it should explain why the survey
is important to him/her, how s/he was
chosen to participate, and who is sponsoring
the survey (the higher the level of
sponsorship the better).
• Also the confidentiality of the results should
be strongly stressed.
• It should identify the survey as official.
23/23
The instructions
• It explains how to complete the
survey and where to return it.
24/23
The questions
25/23
Types of Questionnaires
26/23
Disadvantages
27/23
2. Self-Administered Questionnaires
Are of two types:
The first type is the group administered
questionnaire.
• A sample of respondents is brought together and
asked to respond to a structured sequence of
questions.
However, the second, self-administered
surveys do not require the use of an
interviewer in administering the surveys.
Respondents read the questionnaire and
record their responses themselves.
28/23
3. Household Drop-off
29/23
2. Types of questionnaire based on Variable of
structure or response format
30/23
Structured questionnaires/response formats
31/23
Unstructured questionnaires/ Response Formats
32/23
Questionnaire Construction
Decisions
33/23
2. Keep the questions short
34/23
3. Keep the number of questions to a
minimum
• There is no commonly agreed on maximum
number of questions that should be asked, but
research suggests higher return rates correlate
highly with shorter surveys.
• Ask only questions that will contribute to your
survey. Apply the “So what?” and “Who cares?”
tests to each question.
• “Nice-to-know” questions only add to the size of
the questionnaire.
• Do not leave out, however, questions that
would yield necessary data simply because it
will shorten your survey. If the information is
necessary, ask the question.
35/23
4. Limit each question to one idea
or concept
• A question consisting of more than one idea
may confuse the respondent and lead to a
meaningless answer.
• Consider this question: “Are you in favor
of raising pay and lowering benefits?”
• What would a “Yes (or No)” answer mean?
36/23
5. Do not ask leading questions
• Leading questions are worded in a manner
that suggests an answer.
• Some respondents may give the answer you
are looking for whether or not they think it is
right.
• Such questions can alienate the respondent
and may open your questionnaire to criticism.
• A properly worded question gives no clue as
to which answer you may believe to be the
correct one.
37/23
6. Use subjective terms such as good,
fair, and bad sparingly/economically, if
at all
38/23
7. Allow for all possible answers
39/23
8. Avoid emotional or morally charged
questions and too direct questions
40/23
9. Formulate your questions and
answers to obtain exact information and
to minimize confusion
• The survey author has to always be on the
lookout for questions that could be
misunderstood or confusing. Some terms are
just too vague to be useful.
• For instance, if you ask a question about the
"mass media," what do you mean? The
newspapers? Radio? Television? “How old are
you?” mean on your last or your nearest
birthday? Does “What is your (military) grade?”
mean permanent or temporary grade? As of
what date?
• By including instructions like “Answer all
questions as of (a certain date)”, you can
alleviate many such conflicts.
41/23
10. Include a few questions that can
serve as checks on the accuracy and
consistency of the answers as a whole
• Have some questions that are worded
differently, but are soliciting the same
information, in different parts of the
questionnaire.
• These questions should be designed to
identify the respondents who are just
marking answers randomly or who are trying
to game the survey (giving answers they
think you want to hear).
42/23
11. Understand the “should-would”
question
• Usually respondents answer “should”
questions from a social or moral point of
view while answering “would” questions in
terms of personal preference.
43/23
12. Organize the pattern of the questions
appropriately:
44/23
Cont’d…
• Have general questions precede specific
ones.
• Group similar questions together.
• If you must use personal or emotional
questions, place them at the end of the
questionnaire.
• Thank the respondent at the beginning and
at end
• Assure the respondent that you will send a
copy of the final results.
45/23
Cont’d…
13. Pretest (pilot test) the questionnaire.
14. Have your questionnaire neatly
produced on quality paper.
15. Be realistic in assuming about the
respondents.
16. Finally, make your survey
interesting!
46/23
2. Schedules
47/23
Advantages
1. It can be adopted even in those cases
where informants are illiterates.
2. It eliminates to a great extent the problem
of non-response
3. The enumerator can explain the
significance of the inquiry and the
questions in the questionnaire personally
to the informants and thus ensuring
collection of accurate and reliable
information.
48/23
Limitations
50/23
Difference between questionnaires and
Schedules
e) The questionnaire method is likely to be slow
than schedule.
f) Personal contact is generally not possible in
case of the questionnaire method, but in case
of schedules direct personal contact is
established with respondents.
g) Questionnaire method is only used when
respondents are literate and cooperative, but in
case of schedules the information can be
gathered even when the respondents happen
to be illiterate.
51/23
Difference between questionnaires and
Schedules
h) Wider and more representative sample coverage is
possible in case of questionnaire method, whereas
in schedule this may not be easy.
i) Risk of collecting incomplete and wrong
information is relatively high in case of
questionnaire method than in case of schedule.
j) The success of questionnaire method lies more on
the quality of the questionnaire itself, but in case of
schedules much depends upon the honesty and
competence of enumerators.
k) Along with schedules observation method can be
used but such thing is not possible in case of
questionnaire method
52/23
3. Interviews
• Interviews are among the most
challenging and rewarding forms of
data collection technique.
53/23
Types of Interviews
A. Face-to Face Interviews /Personal
Interviews
• In the personal interview, the interviewer
works directly with the respondent.
54/23
Advantages of Personal Interviews
1. It has the highest response rates.
2. Quick response can be attained.
3. Personal contacts are involved
4. Follow up questions can be asked.
5. It permits the longest questionnaire.
6. Higher flexibility.
7. Interviewers can observe the surroundings and can
use nonverbal communication and visual aids.
8. The interviewer can control who answers the
questions.
9. All types of questions can be asked including complex
questions using illustrations and extensive probes.
55/23
Disadvantages of Personal Interviews
56/23
B. Telephone interview
57/23
Advantages
1. Telephone interviews enable to gather
information rapidly.
2. They allow some contact between the
interviewer and the respondent.
3. They allow the interviewer to ask follow-up
questions.
4. They are cheaper than the personal interview.
5. No field staff is required.
6. Representative and wider distribution of
sample is possible.
58/23
Disadvantages
1. Many people don't have publicly-listed
telephone numbers. Some don't have
telephones.
2. People often don't like the intrusion of a call
to their homes.
3. Telephone interviews have to be relatively
short or people will feel imposed upon.
4. Noise may interrupt the process.
5. Possibility of the bias of the interviewer is
relatively more.
6. It is not suitable for intensive surveys where
comprehensive answers are required to
various questions. 59/23
4. Observation Method
60/23
Advantages
1. The direct observational technique enables the
investigator to record the behavior as it occurs.
2. It can be used regardless of whether the
respondent is willing to report or not.
3. It can be used even when it pertains to those who
are unable to respond, such as an infants and
animals.
4. It is an expensive method
5. The information provided by this method is very
limited.
6. Sometimes unforeseen factors may interfere with
the observational task.
61/23
Limitations
1. Only the current behavior of a person
or group of persons can be observed.
2. It doesn’t help us in gauging a
person’s attitude or opinion or
knowledge on a certain subject.
3. The observational method is very slow
62/23
Selecting the Data collection Method
63/23
Population/sample Issues
64/23
Question Issues
65/23
Content Issues
66/23
Bias Issues
67/23
Administrative Issues
68/23
Thank You!
69/23