Lesson 3
Lesson 3
WISDOM R. MGOMEZULU
ECONOMETRIC PROCEDURE
• Statement of theory or hypothesis.
• Specification of the mathematical model of the theory.
• Specification of the statistical, or econometric, model.
• Obtaining the data.
• Estimation of the parameters of the econometric model.
• Hypothesis testing.
• Forecasting or prediction.
• Using the model for control or policy purposes.
Statement of Theory or Hypothesis
• Now that we have the data, our next task is to estimate the
parameters of the model. The numerical estimates of the
parameters give empirical content to the consumption
function
• Y = 0.65 + 7.2Xi
Hypothesis Testing
• Assuming that the fitted model is a reasonably good
approximation of reality, we have to develop suitable
criteria of finding out whether the estimates are in accord
with the expectations of the theory that is being tested.
• A theory or hypothesis that is not verifiable by empirical
evidence may not be acceptable as a part of scientific
enquiry.
Forecasting or Prediction
• If the chosen model does not refute the hypothesis or
theory under consideration, we may use it to predict the
future value(s) of the dependent, or forecast, variable Y on
the basis of the known or expected future value(s) of the
explanatory, or predictor, variable X.
Use of the Model for Control or Policy
Purposes
1. An Econometric Model
E ( y | x) y| x 1 2 x
E ( y | x) dE ( y | x)
2
x dx
Weekly family 550 650 790 800 1020 1100 1200 1350 1370 1500
consumption
expenditure Y, 600 700 840 930 1070 1150 1360 1370 1450 1520
MK
650 740 900 950 1100 1200 1400 1400 1550 1750
700 800 940 1030 1160 1300 1440 1520 1650 1780
750 850 880 1080 1180 1350 1450 1570 1750 1800
Total 3250 4620 4450 7070 6780 7500 6850 10430 9660 12110
Conditional 650 770 890 1010 1130 1250 1370 1490 1610 1730
means of Y, E(Y|
X)
E ( y | x ) y | x 0 1 x (2.1)
E (y/x)
Average expenditure
E (y/x) = β0 + β1x
∆E (y/x)
∆x
β0
X
Income
E (y/x)
200
150
100
149
Distribution of Y given X = $ 220
101
65
80 140 220
Weekly Income
3.2 Assumptions of the Simple Linear Regression
Model-I
e y E ( y ) y 1 2 x
Rearranging gives
y 1 2 x e
y is dependent variable; x is independent or explanatory variable
y SKIP
y4
e{
.
4 E(y) = 1 + 2x
y3
. .} e 3
y2 e {
2
y1 .
} e1
x1 x2 x3 x4 x
Yi E (Y | X i ) i
or
Yi 0 1 X i i
E (Yi | X i ) E[ E (Y | X i )] E ( i | X i )
E (Yi | X i ) E (Y | X i ) E ( i | X i )
E ( i | X i ) = 0
f (e) f (y)
0 𝜷𝟎 + 𝜷𝟏𝒙
SR1 y 1 2 x e
yˆt b1 b2 xt
eˆt yt yˆt yt b1 b2 xt
t t t t t t)
ˆ
e 2
( y ˆ
y ) 2
ˆ
e *2
( y ˆ
y * 2
y
. y4
^e { ^y = b + b x
4
.^y 1 2
^y 4
.} ^e3
3
y2 .
^e {. y
2 .
3
y^2
^y
1.
} ^e
y1. 1
x1 x2 x3 x4 x
The relationship among ^y, e and the fitted regression line.
y
. y4 ^y = b + b x
y^*2
^y*
. 3
{.
^e*
4
^y*
1 2
^y*= b* + b* x
^y*
1.
. ^e*{ 4
1 2
^e*{ y .
{
3
2 . 2 y3
^e*
1
y1.
x1 x2 x3 x4 x
The sum of squared residuals from any other line will be larger.