Session Changed)
Session Changed)
Session 3
Product Design
OBJECTIVES
Design for Product Development Process Manufacturability Economic Analysis of Measuring Product Development Performance Development Projects Designing for the Customer
Regal Marine
Product Decision
The good or service the organization provides society Top organizations typically focus on core products Customers buy satisfaction, not just a physical good or particular service Fundamental to an organization's strategy with implications throughout the operations function
Differentiation
Shouldice Hospital
Low cost
Taco Bell
Rapid response
Toyota
Introduction
Growth
Maturity
Decline
Figure 5.1
Perceptual Maps
Visual comparison of customer perceptions
Benchmarking
Comparing product/service against best-in-class
Reverse engineering
Dismantling competitors product to improve your own product
Phase 0 Planning --- Input: Corp. Strat, Tech Dev, Mkt. Obj; Output: Target Mkt, Bus goals, assumptions & constraints
Phase 1 - Concept Development --- Des. Of Form, functions & features of the pdt. Phase 2 - System-Level design --- Def of the pdt architecture + decomposition of the pdt into subsystem & components + Final Assembly
Phase 3 - Design Detail --- complete Spec. of geometry, materials, tolerances & identification of all the std. pdts to be purchased from the suppliers. Phase 4 - Testing and Refinement --Prototypes are built + tested for the performance & satisfaction of cust needs Phase 5 - Production Ramp-up --- Pdts are sometimes supplied to preferred cust. For identification of flaws if any.
10
2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8.
Generic (Mkt Pull) E.G. Sprots Items, Furniture Tech Push: Elect. Cables, TV Tube Mfg. Platform Pdts Cameras, Operating Systems Process Intensive Chemicals, paper Ind. Custmised Pdts Watches, Subros making AC for Maruti; High Risk Pdts- PCs, mobiles. Quick Build Products Softwares Complex System Airplanes , Locomotive Engines units
11
12
13
5 5
5 5
Customer Customer requirements requirements information information forms the forms the basis for this basis for this matrix, used matrix, used to translate to translate them into them into operating or operating or engineering engineering goals. goals.
Auto Exposure
Al. Comp.
Auto Focus
Competitive evaluation
1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
X X AB
AB
4 5
XAB
5 5
Failure 1 per 10000
A XB X A B
22
9
75%
27
2 to Infinity
27
2 circuits
32
25
Panel ranking
Relationships:
Strong = 5 Medium = 3 Small = 1
0.5A
B A X
BA X
B A X
B X A
BXA
BA X
14
1. Customer requirements
4. Relationship matrix
6. Benchmarks
15
Can we do without it? Does it do more than is required? Does it cost more than it is worth? Can something else do a better job? Can it be made by
a less costly method? with less costly tooling? with less costly material?
16
Value engineering
Refers to a set of activities undertaken to investigate the design of components in a product development process Strictly from a cost value perspective To alert the product development team to alternatives that
could either bring down the cost or increase the value
17
Figure 5.5
Value Engineering
18
Can we eliminate certain features from the design? Are there instances of over-design in certain components increasing the cost? If so, how can rationalise these aspects? Are there certain features of design that cost more than what it is worth? Is it possible to replace the proposed method of manufacture with a less costly one? Is it possible for someone else (suppliers) to produce certain components cheaper, faster and better? Can we eliminate parts and replace them with more universal parts? Are there opportunities for cost cutting by development of import substitution methods?
19
2. Concurrent Engineering
Lets work together simultaneously
20
Marketing
Design
Planning
Procurement
Production
Finance
21
ers m sto Cu
Marketing
Production
Suppliers
ce nan Fi
22
1.
2.
3.
Greatest improvements related to DFMA arise from simplification of the product by reducing the number of separate parts: During the operation of the product, does the part move relative to all other parts already assembled? Must the part be of a different material or be isolated from other parts already assembled? Must the part be separate from all other parts to allow the disassembly of the product for adjustment or maintenance?
DFM Guidelines
23
Operational Convenience Simplify operations Eliminate adjustments Avoid tools Design for minimum handling Design for top-down assembly Design for efficient & adequate testing
24
Production Design
Simplification
reducing number of parts, assemblies, or options in a product
Standardization
using commonly available and interchangeable parts
Modularity
combining standardized building blocks, or modules, to create unique finished products
25
Design Simplification
(a) Original design (b) Revised design (c) Final design
26
Modular design
combines standardized building blocks/modules into unique products
Product Platforms
Measuring Product Development Performance Measures Performance Freq.Of new products introduced Freq. Of new products introduced Dimension
Time-to-market Time-to-market
Timeto market introduction Time to market introduction Numberstated and number completed Number stated and number completed Actualversus plan Actual versus plan Percentageof sales from new products Percentage of sales from new products
27
Productivity Productivity
Engineeringhours per project Engineering hours per project Costof materials and tooling per project Cost of materials and tooling per project Actualversus plan Actual versus plan Conformance-reliabilityin use Conformance-reliability in use Design-performanceand customer satisfaction Design-performance and customer satisfaction Yield-factoryand field Yield-factory and field
Quality Quality
28
29