Lecture 02
Lecture 02
The United States undertook its own soul-searching, expressed most pointedly in
the television broadcast of If Japan Can... Why Can't We?
Firms began reexamining the techniques of quality control invented over the past
50 years and how those techniques hadOfbeen
Department so successfully employed by the
I.E.M (WBUT)
Japanese. It was in the midst of this economic turmoil that TQM took root.
The exact origin of the term "total quality management" is uncertain.
It may have been first coined in the United Kingdom by the Department of
Trade and Industry during its 1983 "National Quality Campaign“ or it may have
been first coined in the United States by the Naval Air Systems Command to
describe its quality-improvement efforts in 1985.
1. Be Customer focused
2. Insure Total Employee
Involvement
3. Process Centered
4. Integrated system
5. Strategic and systematic
approach
6. Continual Improvement
7. Fact Based Decision
Making
Phillip B. Crosby
Basic Elements of Improvement
Determination (commitment by the top management)
Education (of the employees towards Zero Defects (ZD))
Implementation (of the organizational processes towards ZD)
Department Of I.E.M (WBUT)
for gradual and orderly continuous
improvement over a long period of time with
minimum financial investment, and with
participation by everyone in the organization.
Run Chart:
Measurement against
progression of time.
Control Chart: Add
Upper Control Limit and
Lower Control Limit to
the run chart.
He was the first quality guru to emphasize the importance of the “internal
customer,” the next person in the production process.
He was also one of the first to stress the importance of total company quality
control, rather than just focusing on products and services.
Department Of I.E.M (WBUT)
Dr. Genichi Taguchi is a Japanese quality expert
known for his work in the area of product design.
Taguchi is known for applying a concept called
design of experiment to product design.
This method is an engineering approach that is
based on developing robust
design, a design that results in products that can
perform over a wide range of conditions. of costs
of conformance to specifications is incorrect, and
proposed a different way to look at these costs.
The basic assumptions of TQM and BPR are different. TQM assumes
that the existing practices or systems are principally right and useful.
The target of TQM is to improve on the basis of the existing system.
However, BPR takes an opposite assumption. BPR assumes the
existing system is useless and suggests starting it over. Unlike TQM
that aims on smoothly and incremental improvements, BPR aims on
dramatic results.
Department Of I.E.M (WBUT)
TQM emphasis on total involvement, including all the
stakeholders. The involvement even extends to suppliers and
customers. Also, TQM also suggests involving all the processes
in the company, including human resources management, order
fulfilling, manufacturing, marketing and customer management
and others. However, for BPR, the project can be controlled to a
Department Of I.E.M (WBUT)
specified area only.
Standardization is one of the key points of TQM. TQM aims on standardize the
practices, thus achieving a consistent performance. It also makes that there is
a certain degree of documentation for TQM. However, BPR emphasis on
flexibility and believes that standardization would increase the complexity of
the process. Therefore, standardization is rare in BPR and the level of
documentation is much lower.