The document discusses positivism in geography, which applies natural science principles to the study of geographical phenomena through empirical observation and quantitative data. It outlines the origins of positivism, key principles, and its significant impact on the discipline, including the quantitative revolution and the development of new techniques like GIS. Criticisms of positivism are also addressed, highlighting its limitations such as oversimplification and neglect of social context.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
698 views14 pages
Positivism in Geography
The document discusses positivism in geography, which applies natural science principles to the study of geographical phenomena through empirical observation and quantitative data. It outlines the origins of positivism, key principles, and its significant impact on the discipline, including the quantitative revolution and the development of new techniques like GIS. Criticisms of positivism are also addressed, highlighting its limitations such as oversimplification and neglect of social context.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
DEPT OF GEOGRAPHY AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KNUST
GEOG 253: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF GEOGRAPHY PPT LECTURE NOTES POSITIVISM IN GEOGRAPHY
SETH AGYEMANG, PhD
INTRODUCTION • Positivism refers to the application of natural sciences principles of investigation to the social sciences. • Positivism in geography refers to the application of positivist or natural science principles and methods to the study of geography. • Positivism emphasizes the use of scientific methods, empirical observation, and quantitative data to understand and explain geographical phenomena. Assumptions of Positivism
• Positivism assumes that phenomena are
measurable using the principles of the scientific method. • It also assumes that human behaviour is a reaction to external stimuli. • That it is possible to observe and measure social phenomena using the principles of the natural and physical sciences. • Laws govern social phenomena, and these laws can be discovered following the principles of the scientific methods. • Geography can and should be studied with the same methods as found in the natural sciences. Origin
• Positivism began in the 19th century, primarily through the work
of French philosopher Auguste Comte (1798-1857). His work laid the foundation for the development of positivist thought in various fields such as science, philosophy, and social sciences. • Comte himself was influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as René Descartes, John Locke, and Immanuel Kant, who emphasized the use of reason and empirical observation to understand the world. • The scientific revolution of the 17th century, led by scholars like Galileo and Isaac Newton, showed the power of empirical observation and experimentation in understanding the natural world. • The emphasis of the French Revolution (1789-1799) on reason, science, and progress also influenced Comte's thought. • Comte believed that there should be a science of social relations (called sociology) that should be developed on the same principles as the natural sciences. Comte's positivist philosophy:
• Law of three stages: Comte held that
human knowledge and society develop through three stages: theological, metaphysical, and positive. • In the positive stage, knowledge is derived from observation, experimentation, and the use of scientific methods. • He believed that positivism could be used to reform society and create a more rational and just social order. Entry into geography • Positivism entered geography in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, influenced by the broader intellectual and scientific trends of the time. • Five pathways of positivism in geography. • 1. The early influences: - Alexander von Humboldt—he emphasized the importance of empirical observation and scientific methods in geography. -Carl Ritter-developed the concept of "comparative geography," which involved comparing and contrasting different geographical regions. Entry into geography • 2. In the late 19th century, positivism influenced geographical thought through: -Paul Vidal de la Blache-French geographer who advocated for a more scientific approach to geography, emphasizing the importance of observation, experimentation, and empirical data. -W.M. Davis-American geographer who developed the concept of "geomorphology," which emphasized the study of landforms and landscapes using scientific methods. • 3. In the 1950s and 1960s, the quantitative revolution in geography, led by geographers such as William Garrison, Duane Marble, and Richard Morrill, emphasized the use of statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations to study geographical phenomena. • 4. Spatial analysis: The development of spatial analysis and geographic information systems (GIS) further solidified positivism's influence in geography. Entry into geography • ‘The Nature of Geography’ by Richard Hartshorne (1939) argued for a more scientific and systematic approach to geography. • ‘The Quantitative Revolution in Geography’- edited by William Garrison and Duane Marble (1959) marked the beginning of the quantitative revolution in geography. Key principles of Positivism • Empiricism: Geographical knowledge should be based on empirical observation, experimentation, and analysis of data. • Objectivity: In the search for knowledge and explanation about phenomena, geographers should be objective and unbiased in their approach. • Quantification: Since phenomena is measurable and quantifiable, geographers should use quantitative methods and statistical analysis to understand and explain geographical phenomena. • Universalism: Geographical principles and laws are universal and apply everywhere. Principles (cont) • The unity of science. Science is united by a common methodological approach which is applicable in all aspects. • Determinism: Geographical phenomena are determined by underlying laws and processes, which can be discovered through scientific inquiry. • Falsifiability: Geographical knowledge, hypotheses and theories must be testable or falsifiable with evidence through observation and experimentation. Impact on geography: • Positivism has significantly impacted the development of geography as a discipline. • Increased emphasis on scientific methods: Positivism led to a greater emphasis on scientific methods, empirical observation, and quantitative data in geography. • Development of new techniques and technologies: Positivism drove the development of new techniques and technologies, such as spatial analysis and GIS. • Critiques of traditional geography: Positivism led to critiques of traditional geography, which was seen as being too descriptive and lacking in scientific rigor. • Quantitative revolution: The adoption of quantitative methods and statistical analysis in geography, which transformed the discipline in the mid-20th century. Impact on geography: • In physical geography, the study of physical geographical processes such as climate, hydrology, and geomorphology, became much enhanced with the use of positivist methods. • Positivism has also introduced more objectivity and rigor into geography. • Through positivist advocacy, quantitative approaches to data collection such as experimentations, questionnaires, measurements, etc have been incorporated into geography, alongside more accurate methods of analysis such as modelling techniques, inferential statistics, regression, etc. Criticisms and limitations:
• Oversimplification: Positivist approaches tend to
oversimplify complex geographical phenomena. • Lack of context: Positivist methods neglect the social, cultural, and historical context of geographical phenomena. • Determinism: Positivist approaches can be overly deterministic, neglecting the role of human agency and uncertainty. It also ignores people’s subjective experiences and the meaning of an action or behaviour to the actors. • Belief in the unity of science is unrealistic, and social science variables may not be properly studied using natural science principles. • Contrary to the positivist stance, not all geographic phenomena and processes can be measured or quantified, and attempts to do so may only lead to incorrect conclusions. THANK YOU