Lect 5 a Testing Techniques
Lect 5 a Testing Techniques
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 1
Outline
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 2
Some Observations
It is impossible to completely test any nontrivial module or any
system
Theoretical limitations: Halting problem ??
Practial limitations: Prohibitive in time and cost
Testing can only show the presence of bugs, not their absence
(Dijkstra)
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 3
Testing Activities
Subsystem Requirements
Unit System
Code Test Analysis
Design Document
Tested Document User
Subsystem
Subsystem Manual
Unit
Code Test
Tested Integration Functional
Subsystem
Test Test
Integrated Functioning
Subsystems System
Tested Subsystem
Subsystem Unit
Code Test
All
Alltests
testsby
bydeveloper
developer
Cf. levels of testing
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 4
Testing Activities continued
Client’s
Global Understanding User
Requirements of Requirements Environment
Usable
Tests
Testsby
byclient
client System
Tests
Testsby
bydeveloper
developer
User’s understanding
System in
Use
Tests
Tests(?)
(?) by
byuser
user
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 5
Level of abstraction
Levels of Testing in V Model
system system
requireme integration
nts
software
requireme acceptance
nts test
preliminar software
te
y integratio
an
t s
design n
aly
and
componen
z
detailed
ea
i
t
nt
design
nd
test
eg
r
de
at
code & unit
sig
e
debug test
n
Time
N.B.: component test vs. unit
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit
test; acceptance test vs. system integration
Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 6
Test Planning [Pressman]
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 7
Fault Handling Techniques
Fault Handling
Fault Tolerance
Fault Avoidance Fault Detection
Configuration
Verification
Management
Testing Debugging
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 8
Quality Assurance encompasses Testing
Quality Assurance
Usability Testing
Atomic Modular
Configuration Transactions Redundancy
Verification
Management
Fault Detection
Reviews
Debugging
Walkthrough Inspection
Testing
Correctness Performance
Unit Integration System Debugging Debugging
Testing Testing Testing
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 9
Types of Testing
Unit Testing:
Individual subsystem
Carried out by developers
Goal: Confirm that subsystems is correctly coded and carries out the
intended functionality
Integration Testing:
Groups of subsystems (collection of classes) and eventually the entire
system
Carried out by developers
Goal: Test the interface among the subsystem
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 10
System Testing
Terminology:
System Testing: system testing here = validation testing
The entire system
Carried out by developers
Goal: Determine if the system meets the requirements (functional
and global)
Acceptance Testing: 2 kinds of Acceptance testing
Evaluates the system delivered by developers
Carried out by the client. May involve executing typical
transactions on site on a trial basis
Goal: Demonstrate that the system meets customer requirements
and is ready to use
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 11
Unit Testing
Informal:
Incremental coding Write a little, test a little
Static Analysis:
Hand execution: Reading the source code
Walk-Through (informal presentation to others)
Code Inspection (formal presentation to others)
Automated Tools checking for
syntactic and semantic errors
departure from coding standards
Dynamic Analysis:
Black-box testing (Test the input/output behavior)
White-box testing (Test the internal logic of the subsystem or object)
Data-structure based testing (Data types determine test cases)
Focus: I/O behavior. If for any given input, we can predict the
output, then the module passes the test.
Almost always impossible to generate all possible inputs ("test
cases") why?
Goal: Reduce number of test cases by equivalence partitioning:
Divide input conditions into equivalence classes
Choose test cases for each equivalence class. (Example: If an object
is supposed to accept a negative number, testing one negative
number is enough)
If x = 3 then …
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 14
White-box Testing
Focus: Thoroughness (Coverage). Every statement in the component is executed at
least once.
Four types of white-box testing
Statement Testing
Loop Testing
Path Testing
Branch Testing
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 15
White-box Testing (Continued)
Statement Testing (Algebraic Testing): Test single statements
Loop Testing:
Cause execution of the loop to be skipped completely. (Exception:
Repeat loops)
Loop to be executed exactly once
Loop to be executed more than once
Path testing:
Make sure all paths in the program are executed
Branch Testing (Conditional Testing): Make sure that each
possible outcome from a condition is tested at least once
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 16
White-Box Testing
Loop Testing
[Pressman]
Simple
loop
Nested
Loops
Concatenated
Loops Unstructured
Loops
Why is loop testing important?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 17
White-box Testing Example
FindMean(float Mean, FILE ScoreFile)
{ SumOfScores = 0.0; NumberOfScores = 0; Mean = 0;
Read(ScoreFile, Score); /*Read in and sum the scores*/
while (! EOF(ScoreFile) {
if ( Score > 0.0 ) {
SumOfScores = SumOfScores + Score;
NumberOfScores++;
}
Read(ScoreFile, Score);
}
/* Compute the mean and print the result */
if (NumberOfScores > 0 ) {
Mean = SumOfScores/NumberOfScores;
printf("The mean score is %f \n", Mean);
} else
printf("No scores found in file\n");
}
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 18
White-box Testing Example: Determining the Paths
FindMean (FILE ScoreFile)
{ float SumOfScores = 0.0;
int NumberOfScores = 0;
1
float Mean=0.0; float Score;
Read(ScoreFile, Score);
2 while (! EOF(ScoreFile) {
3 if (Score > 0.0 ) {
SumOfScores = SumOfScores + Score;
4
NumberOfScores++;
}
5
Read(ScoreFile, Score); 6
}
/* Compute the mean and print the result */
7 if (NumberOfScores > 0) {
Mean = SumOfScores / NumberOfScores;
printf(“ The mean score is %f\n”, Mean); 8
} else
printf (“No scores found in file\n”); 9
}
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 19
Constructing the Logic Flow Diagram
Start
F
2
T
3
T F
4 5
7
T F
8 9
Exit
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 20
Finding the Test Cases
Start
1
a (Covered by any data)
2
b (Data set must contain at least one value)
(Positive score) d 3
e (Negative score)
c 4 5
(Data set must h (Reached if either f or
be empty) f g
6 e is reached)
7
(Total score < 0.0) i j (Total score > 0.0)
8 9
k l
Exit
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 21
Self reading
Comparison of White & Black-box Testing 25.1.2002
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 22
The 4 Testing Steps
1.1.Select
Selectwhat
whathas
hasto
tobe
be 3.3.Develop
Developtest
testcases
cases
measured
measured AAtest
testcase
caseisisaaset
setof
oftest
test
Analysis: data
dataororsituations
situationsthat
thatwill
Analysis:Completeness
Completenessof of will
requirements be
beused
usedtotoexercise
exercisethetheunit
unit
requirements
Design: (code,
(code,module,
module,system)
system)being
being
Design:tested
testedfor
forcohesion
cohesion tested
testedororabout
aboutthe theattribute
attribute
Implementation:
Implementation:Code
Codetests being
tests beingmeasured
measured
2.2.Decide
Decidehow
howthe
thetesting
testingisis 4.4.Create
Createthe
thetest
testoracle
oracle
done
done An
Anoracle
oraclecontains
containsofofthe
the
Code
Codeinspection
inspection predicted
predictedresults
resultsfor
foraaset
setof
of
Proofs test
testcases
cases
Proofs(Design
(DesignbybyContract)
Contract)
Black-box, The
Thetest
testoracle
oraclehas
hasto
tobe
be
Black-box,white
whitebox,
box, written down before the
Select written down before the
Selectintegration
integrationtesting
testing actual
actualtesting
testingtakes
takesplace
place
strategy
strategy(big
(bigbang,
bang,bottom
bottom
up,
up,top
topdown,
down,sandwich)
sandwich)
Next module
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 23
Self reading
Guidance for Test Case Selection
Use
Useanalysis
analysis knowledge
knowledge Use
Useimplementation
implementation
about
aboutfunctional
functional knowledge
requirements knowledgeabout
aboutalgorithms:
algorithms:
requirements(black-box
(black-box Examples:
testing):
testing): Examples:
Use Force
Forcedivision
divisionby
byzero
zero
Usecases
cases
Expected Use
Usesequence
sequenceofoftest
testcases
casesfor
Expectedinput
inputdata
data for
Invalid interrupt
interrupthandler
handler
Invalidinput
inputdata
data
Use
Usedesign
design knowledge
knowledgeabout
about
system
systemstructure,
structure,algorithms,
algorithms,
data
datastructures
structures (white-box
(white-box
testing):
testing):
Control
Controlstructures
structures
Test
Testbranches,
branches,loops,
loops,......
Data
Datastructures
structures
Test
Testrecords
recordsfields,
fields,
arrays, ...
arrays, ...
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 24
Self reading
Unit-testing Heuristics
1.1.Create
Createunit
unittests
testsasassoon
soonasasobject
object 4.4.Desk
Deskcheck
checkyour
yoursource
sourcecode
code
design
designisiscompleted:
completed: Reduces
Reducestesting
testingtime
time
Black-box
Black-boxtest:test:Test
Testthe
theuse
use 5.5.Create
Createaatest
testharness
harness
cases & functional model Test
cases & functional model Testdrivers
driversandandtest
teststubs
stubsareare
White-box needed
neededforforintegration
integrationtesting
White-boxtest: test:Test
Testthe
the testing
dynamic
dynamicmodel model 6.6.Describe
Describethethetest
testoracle
oracle
Data-structure Often
Oftenthetheresult
resultof ofthe
thefirst
Data-structuretest: test:Test
Testthethe first
object
objectmodel
model successfully executed
successfully executed test test
2.2.Develop 7.7.Execute
Executethe
thetest
testcases
cases
Developthe thetest
testcases
cases
Goal: Don’t
Don’tforget
forgetregression
regressiontesting
testing
Goal:Find
Findthe theminimal
minimal Re-execute
number
numberof oftest
testcases
casestotocover
cover Re-executetest testcases
casesevery
everytime
time
as aachange
changeisismade.
asmany
manypathspathsas aspossible
possible made.
Big cost -> what should be done?
3.3.Cross-check
Cross-checkthe thetest
testcases
casestoto
eliminate 8.8.Compare
Comparethe theresults
resultsof
ofthe
thetest
testwith
withthe
eliminateduplicates
duplicates test oracle
the
Don't test oracle
Don'twaste
wasteyouryourtime!
time! Automate
Automateas asmuch
muchas aspossible
possible
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 25
OOT Strategy
[Pressman]
dead nonworking
acct close acct
Figure 14.3 State diagram for Account class (adapted from [ KIR94])
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 29
NFRs: Reliability [Chung, RE Lecture Notes]]
Counting Bugs
Sometimes reliability requirements take the form:
"The software shall have no more than X bugs/1K LOC"
But how do we measure bugs at delivery time?
Bebugging Process - based on a Monte Carlo technique for statistical analysis of random events.
1. before testing, a known number of bugs (seeded bugs) are secretly inserted.
2. estimate the number of bugs in the system
3. remove (both known and new) bugs.
# of detected seeded bugs/ # of seeded bugs = # of detected bugs/ # of bugs in the system
# of bugs in the system = # of seeded bugs x # of detected bugs /# of detected seeded bugs
But, deadly bugs vs. insignifant ones; not all bugs are equally detectable; ( Suggestion [Musa87]:
Testing
Testingisisstill
stillaablack
blackart,
art,but
butmany
manyrules
rulesand
andheuristics
heuristicsare
are
available
available
Testing consists of component-testing (unit testing, integration
Testing consists of component-testing (unit testing, integration
testing)
testing)and
andsystem
systemtesting,
testing,and
and…
…
OOT and architectural testing, still challenging
OOT and architectural testing, still challenging
User-oriented reliability modeling and evaluation not adequate
User-oriented reliability modeling and evaluation not adequate
Testing has its own lifecycle
Testing has its own lifecycle
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 31
Additional Slides
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 32
Terminology
There are many different types of errors and different ways how
we can deal with them.
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 33
Examples of Faults and Errors
Faults
Faultsin
inthe
theInterface
Interface Mechanical
MechanicalFaults
Faults(very
(very
specification
specification hard
hardto
tofind)
find)
Mismatch
Mismatchbetween
betweenwhat
whatthe
the Documentation
Documentationdoes
doesnot
not
client
clientneeds
needsand
andwhat
whatthe
the match
match actual
actualconditions
conditionsor
or
server
serveroffers
offers operating
operatingprocedures
procedures
Mismatch
Mismatchbetween
between Errors
requirements
Errors
requirementsandand Stress
implementation
implementation Stressor
oroverload
overloaderrors
errors
Capacity
Capacityororboundary
boundaryerrors
errors
Algorithmic
AlgorithmicFaults
Faults Timing
Missing Timingerrors
errors
Missinginitialization
initialization Throughput
Branching Throughputor orperformance
performance
Branchingerrors
errors(too
(toosoon,
soon, errors
errors
too
toolate)
late)
Missing
Missingtest
testfor
fornil
nil
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 34
Dealing with Errors
Verification:
Assumes hypothetical environment that does not match real
environment
Proof might be buggy (omits important constraints; simply wrong)
Modular redundancy:
Expensive
Declaring a bug to be a “feature”
Bad practice
Patching
Slows down performance
Testing (this lecture)
Testing is never good enough
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 35
Another View on How to Deal with Errors
Error prevention (before the system is released):
Use good programming methodology to reduce complexity
Use version control to prevent inconsistent system
Apply verification to prevent algorithmic bugs
Error detection (while system is running):
Testing: Create failures in a planned way
Debugging: Start with an unplanned failures
Monitoring: Deliver information about state. Find performance bugs
Error recovery (recover from failure once the system is released):
Data base systems (atomic transactions)
Modular redundancy
Recovery blocks
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 36
What is this?
A failure?
An error?
A fault?
Need to specify
the desired behavior first!
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 37
Erroneous State (“Error”)
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 38
Algorithmic Fault
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 39
Mechanical Fault
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 40
How do we deal with Errors and Faults?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 41
Verification?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 42
Modular Redundancy?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 43
Declaring the Bug
as a Feature?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 44
Patching?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 45
Testing?
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 46
Testing takes creativity
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 47
Test Cases
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 48