Analysis of Algorithms

Asymptotic Analysis
 Analysis of Algorithms
• An algorithm is a finite set of precise instructions
for performing a computation or for solving a
problem.
• What is the goal of analysis of algorithms?
– To compare algorithms mainly in terms of running
time but also in terms of other factors (e.g., memory
requirements, programmer's effort etc.)
• What do we mean by running time analysis?
– Determine how running time increases as the size
of the problem increases.

2
 Input Size

• Input size (number of elements in the input)

– size of an array

– polynomial degree

– # of elements in a matrix

– # of bits in the binary representation of the input

– vertices and edges in a graph

3
 Types of Analysis
• Worst case
– Provides an upper bound on running time
– An absolute guarantee that the algorithm would not run longer,
no matter what the inputs are
• Best case
– Provides a lower bound on running time
– Input is the one for which the algorithm runs the fastest

Lower Bound Running Time Upper Bound

• Average case
– Provides a prediction about the running time
– Assumes that the input is random
4
 How do we compare algorithms?
• We need to define a number of objective
measures.

(1) Compare execution times?

Not good: times are specific to a particular
computer !!

(2) Count the number of statements executed?

Not good: number of statements vary with
the programming language as well as the
style of the individual programmer.
5
 Ideal Solution

• Express running time as a function of the

input size n (i.e., f(n)).
• Compare different functions corresponding
to running times.
• Such an analysis is independent of
machine time, programming style, etc.

6
 Example
• Associate a "cost" with each statement.
• Find the "total cost“ by finding the total number of times
each statement is executed.
Algorithm 1 Algorithm 2

Cost Cost
arr[0] = 0; c1 for(i=0; i<N; i++) c2
arr[1] = 0; c1 arr[i] = 0; c1
arr[2] = 0; c1
... ...
arr[N-1] = 0; c1
----------- -------------
c1+c1+...+c1 = c1 x N (N+1) x c2 + N x c1 =
(c2 + c1) x N + c2

7
 Another Example

• Algorithm 3 Cost
sum = 0; c1
for(i=0; i<N; i++) c2
for(j=0; j<N; j++) c2
sum += arr[i][j]; c3
------------
c1 + c2 x (N+1) + c2 x N x (N+1) + c3 x N2

8
 Asymptotic Analysis
• To compare two algorithms with running
times f(n) and g(n), we need a rough
measure that characterizes how fast
each function grows.
• Hint: use rate of growth
• Compare functions in the limit, that is,
asymptotically!
(i.e., for large values of n)

9
 Rate of Growth
• Consider the example of buying elephants and
fish:
Cost: cost_of_elephants + cost_of_fish
Cost ~ cost_of_elephants (approximation)
• The low order terms in a function are relatively
insignificant for large n
n4 + 100n2 + 10n + 50 ~ n4

i.e., we say that n4 + 100n2 + 10n + 50 and n4

have the same rate of growth

10
Common orders of magnitude

11
Common orders of magnitude

12
 Asymptotic Notation

• O notation: asymptotic “less than”:

– f(n)=O(g(n)) implies: f(n) “≤” g(n)

  notation: asymptotic “greater than”:

– f(n)=  (g(n)) implies: f(n) “≥” g(n)

  notation: asymptotic “equality”:

– f(n)=  (g(n)) implies: f(n) “=” g(n)

13
 Development of Notation

• Not concerned with small values of n

• Concerned with VERY LARGE values of n
• Asymptotic – refers to study of function f as n
approaches infinity

• Example: f(n) = n2+4n + 20

n2 is the dominant term and the term 4n + 20
becomes insignificant as n grows larger
 Big-O Notation

• We say fA(n)=30n+8 is order n, or O (n)

It is, at most, roughly proportional to n.
• fB(n)=n2+1 is order n2, or O(n2). It is, at most,
roughly proportional to n2.
• In general, any O(n2) function is faster-
growing than any O(n) function.

15
 Visualizing Orders of Growth
• On a graph, as
you go to the
right, a faster
growing

Value of function 
function fA(n)=30n+8
eventually
becomes
larger... fB(n)=n2+1

Increasing n 

16
 More Examples …

• n4 + 100n2 + 10n + 50 is O(n4)

• 10n3 + 2n2 is O(n3)
• n3 - n2 is O(n3)
• constants
– 10 is O(1)
– 1273 is O(1)

17
 Back to Our Example
Algorithm 1 Algorithm 2
Cost Cost
arr[0] = 0; c1 for(i=0; i<N; i++) c2
arr[1] = 0; c1 arr[i] = 0; c1
arr[2] = 0; c1
...
arr[N-1] = 0; c1
----------- -------------
c1+c1+...+c1 = c1 x N (N+1) x c2 + N x c1 =
(c2 + c1) x N + c2

• Both algorithms are of the same order: O(N)

18
 Example (cont’d)

Algorithm 3 Cost
sum = 0; c1
for(i=0; i<N; i++) c2
for(j=0; j<N; j++) c2
sum += arr[i][j]; c3
------------
c1 + c2 x (N+1) + c2 x N x (N+1) + c3 x N2 = O(N2)

19
 Asymptotic notations
• O-notation

20
Big-O Visualization

O(g(n)) is the set of

functions with smaller
or same order of
growth as g(n)

21
 Examples

– 2n2 = O(n2n
3 2 ≤ cn3  2 ≤ cn  c = 1 and n = 2
): 0

n22):≤ cn2  c ≥ 1  c = 1 and n0= 1

– n2 = O(n

– 1000n2+1000n = O(n2):

000n2+1000n ≤ 1000n2+ n2 =1001n2 c=1001 and n0 = 10

n ≤
– n = O(n ):
2 cn 2
 cn ≥ 1  c = 1 and n0= 1

22
 More Examples
• Show that 30n+8 is O(n).
– Show c,n0: 30n+8  cn, n>n0 .
• Let c=31, n0=8. Assume n>n0=8. Then
cn = 31n = 30n + n > 30n+8, so 30n+8 < cn.

23
 Big-O example, graphically
• Note 30n+8 isn’t
less than n
anywhere (n>0).
cn =
• It isn’t even
31n 30n+8

Value of function 
less than 31n
everywhere.
• But it is less than
31n everywhere to
30n+8
n
the right of n=8. O(n)
n>n0=8 
Increasing n 

24
 No Uniqueness
• There is no unique set of values for n0 and c in proving the
asymptotic bounds
• Prove that 100n + 5 = O(n2)
– 100n + 5 ≤ 100n + n = 101n ≤ 101n2

for all n ≥ 5

n0 = 5 and c = 101 is a solution

– 100n + 5 ≤ 100n + 5n = 105n ≤ 105n 2

for all n ≥ 1

n0 = 1 and c = 105 is also a solution

Must find SOME constants c and n0 that satisfy the asymptotic notation relation
25
 Big-O Notation
Some Big-O complexity classes in order of magnitude from smallest to highest:

O(1) Constant
O(log(n)) Logarithmic
O(n) Linear
O(n log(n)) n log n
O(nx) {e.g., O(n2), O(n3), etc} Polynomial

O(an) {e.g., O(1.6n), O(2n), etc} Exponential

O(n!) Factorial
O(nn)
 Asymptotic notations (cont.)
  - notation

(g(n)) is the set of functions

with larger or same order of
growth as g(n)

27
 The Big-Omega Notation

The inverse of Big-Oh is Ω

If g(n) = O(f(n)),
then f(n) = Ω (g(n))

f(n) grows faster or with the

same rate as g(n): f(n) = Ω
(g(n))
 Examples
– 5n2 = (n)
 cn
 c, n0 such that: 0  cn  5n 2  5n2 c = 1 and n0 = 1

– 100n + 5 ≠ (n2)
 c, n0 such that: 0  cn2  100n + 5
100n + 5  100n + 5n ( n  1) = 105n
cn2  105n
 n(cn – 105)  0
 n  105/c
Since n is positive  cn – 105  0
 contradiction: n cannot be smaller than a constant

– n = (2n), n3 = (n2), n = (logn)

29
 Asymptotic notations (cont.)
 -notation

(g(n)) is the set of functions

with the same order of growth
as g(n)

30
 Examples
– n2/2 –n/2 = (n2)

• ½ n2 - ½ n ≤ ½ n2 n ≥ 0  c2= ½

• ½ n2 - ½ n ≥ ½ n2 - ½ n * ½ n ( n ≥ 2 ) = ¼ n2 

c1= ¼

– n ≠ (n2): c1 n2 ≤ n ≤ c2 n2

 only holds for: n ≤ 1/c1

31
 Examples
– 6n3 ≠ (n2): c1 n2 ≤ 6n3 ≤ c2 n2

 only holds for: n ≤ c2 /6

– n ≠ (logn): c1 logn ≤ n ≤ c2 logn

 c2 ≥ n/logn,  n≥ n0 – impossible

32
 Relations Between Different Sets
• Subset relations between order-of-growth sets.

RR
O( f ) ( f )
•f
( f )

33
 Little oh

f(n) grows slower than g(n)

(or g(n) grows faster than f(n))
if

lim( f(n) / g(n) ) = 0, n→∞

Notation: f(n) = o( g(n) )

pronounced "little oh"
 Little omega

f(n) grows faster than

g(n)
(or g(n) grows slower than
f(n))
if

lim( f(n) / g(n) ) = ∞, n ->

∞
 Logarithms and properties
• In algorithm analysis we often use the notation “log n”
without specifying the base

Binary logarithm lg n log2 n log x y  y log x

Natural logarithm ln n loge n log xy  log x  log y
x
lg k n (lg n ) k log  log x  log y
y
lg lg n lg(lg n ) log a
a logb x  x b

log b x  log a x
log a b

36
 More Examples
• For each of the following pairs of functions, either f(n) is
O(g(n)), f(n) is Ω(g(n)), or f(n) = Θ(g(n)). Determine
which relationship is correct.
– f(n) = log n2; g(n) = log n + 5 f(n) =  (g(n))
– f(n) = n; g(n) = log n2 f(n) = (g(n))
– f(n) = log log n; g(n) = log n f(n) = O(g(n))
– f(n) = n; g(n) = log2 n f(n) = (g(n))
– f(n) = n log n + n; g(n) = log nf(n) = (g(n))
– f(n) = 10; g(n) = log 10 f(n) = (g(n))
– f(n) = 2n; g(n) = 10n2 f(n) = (g(n))
– f(n) = 2n; g(n) = 3n f(n) = O(g(n))
37
 Properties
• Theorem:
f(n) = (g(n))  f = O(g(n)) and f = (g(n))
• Transitivity:
– f(n) = (g(n)) and g(n) = (h(n))  f(n) = (h(n))
– Same for O and 
• Reflexivity:
– f(n) = (f(n))
– Same for O and 
• Symmetry:
– f(n) = (g(n)) if and only if g(n) = (f(n))
• Transpose symmetry:
– f(n) = O(g(n)) if and only if g(n) = (f(n))
38
 Asymptotic Notations in Equations
• On the right-hand side
 (n2) stands for some anonymous function in (n2)
2n2 + 3n + 1 = 2n2 + (n) means:
There exists a function f(n)  (n) such that
2n2 + 3n + 1 = 2n2 + f(n)
• On the left-hand side
2n2 + (n) = (n2)
No matter how the anonymous function is chosen on
the left-hand side, there is a way to choose the
anonymous function on the right-hand side to make
the equation valid.

39