Consumers Right Protection and Product Liability
Consumers Right Protection and Product Liability
Liability for a product defect could rest with any party in the product's
chain of distribution, such as:
The product manufacturer;
• A manufacturer of component parts;
• A party that assembles or installs the product;
The wholesaler, and The retail store that sold the product to the consumer.
For strict liability to apply, the sale of a product must be made in the regular course of
the supplier's business. Thus, someone who sells a product at a garage sale would
probably not be liable in a product liability action.
TYPES OF PRODUCT DEFECTS UNDER ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY
A PLAINTIFF IN A PRODUCT LIABILITY CASE MUST PROVE THAT THE PRODUCT THAT CAUSED
INJURY WAS DEFECTIVE AND THAT THE DEFECT MADE THE PRODUCT UNREASONABLY
DANGEROUS. THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF DEFECTS THAT MIGHT CAUSE INJURY AND GIVE RISE
TO MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER LIABILITY:
1. Design Defects - Present in a product from the
beginning, even before it is manufactured, in that
something in the design of the product is inherently
unsafe.
2. Manufacturing Defects - Those that occur in
the course of a product's manufacture or assembly,
3. Marketing Defects - Flaws in the way a product
is marketed, such as improper labeling insufficient
instructions, or inadequate safety warnings.
WHO'S
RESPONSIBLE?
Who's Responsible? The doctrine, known
as
"res ipsa loquitur," shifts the burden of
proof in some product liability cases to
the defendant(s). Translated, this Latin
term means "the thing speaks for itself,"
and indicates that the defect at issue
would not exist unless someone was
negligent. If the doctrine is successfully
invoked, the plaintiff is no longer required
to prove how the defendant was
negligent, rather, the defendant is
required to prove that it was not
negligent.
UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE
PRODUCTS
Unavoidably Unsafe Products By their nature,
some products simply cannot be made safer
without losing their usefulness. For example, an
electric knife that is too dull to injure anyone
would also be useless for its intended purpose. It
is generally believed that, as to such products,
users and consumers are the best equipped to
minimize risk. Thus, while a product might not be
deemed unreasonably dangerous, manufacturers
and suppliers of unavoidably unsafe products
must give proper warnings of the dangers and
risks of their products so that consumers can
make informed decisions regarding them.
COMMON DEFENSES TO
PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS
A defense often raised in product liability cases is that
the plaintiff has not sufficiently identified the supplier
of the product that allegedly caused the injury. A
plaintiff must be able to connect the product with the
party(ies) responsible for manufacturing or supplying it.
There is an exception to this rule, known as the "market
share liability" exception, which applies in cases
involving defective medications. Where a plaintiff
cannot identify which of the pharmaceutical companies
that supply a particular drug supplied the drug he/she
took, each manufacturer will be held liable according to
its percentage of sales in the area where the injury
occurred.create and maintain a publicly available
written plan detailing how they keep their consumer's
personal information secure. Also, the Financial
NOW IT'S TIME FOR THE LAST AREA OF
LAW SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON
PRIVACY AND IDENTITY PROTECTION:
THE CHILDREN'S ONLINE PRIVACY
PROTECTION ACT
The COPPA provides children and their parent's
protection by regulating what information a
company may collect about a child and how that
information is used.
SHORT-TERM LENDING.
Most people have at least one month in their life where
it becomes difficult to keep up with expenses. When this
happens, many consumers turn to short-term lenders to
help them over this difficult period.
THANK YOU
very PREPARED BY:
HEZEL JOY GONZALES
LOURENCE PABILARIO
MARY ANGELINE MAGBATA
DAVE CLARK CAHILIG