QUESTIONNAIRE
Questionnaire construction
4. Redrafting of the questionnaire
If problems were found then the
questionnaire will need to be redrafted
If there are major changes required it
is best to then do another pilot
If the problems are minor, the
researcher may then proceed to
administration of the questionnaire to
the full sample
Questionnaire construction
5. Administration of the questionnaire
After development of the questionnaire,
it is administered to the full sample of
respondents
How would this be done? Postal,
telephone, structured interview. Mode of
administration differences
The responses are then analyzed in
terms of the researcher’s aims and
objectives
Ethical Considerations
These apply to all types of research
and generally an ethics application
will be required with human subjects
In designing questionnaire questions,
respondents should not be misled
concerning the aims of the study or
how their data will be treated
(confidentiality aspects).
Ethical Considerations
Ifthe questionnaire is anonymous,
those who do not choose to reply
should not be pestered
However reminder postcards may be
sent out and then another follow up
questionnaire if necessary
Hence, the chief investigator will
know who and who has not replied.
De-identification and safe storage
Question and questionnaire
formats
Interviewer schedule method
Formal questionnaire not prepared to
be filled in by the respondent
Rather, it guides the interviewer who
asks the questions
Can probe to clarify response vs. self
report
There are cost considerations for
using this method.
Interview Methods
Needs expert interviewers
Time consuming
May introduce interviewer bias
Question and questionnaire
formats
Telephone questionnaires
May be more efficient to collect data via
telephone than via postal means
Can get better response rate than by postal
methods
Advantage of being ‘anonymous’ over face
to face interview method
Can automate data entry
Not everyone has a phone
Difficult to administer long questionnaires
Question and questionnaire
formats
Open-ended and closed-response formats
Q1. How do you feel about the standard of the
treatment you received while you were a patient at
this hospital? (also focus group approaches)
Q2. How would you rate the standard of the
treatment you received while you were a patient at
this hospital (circle one number)
Excellent 1
Good 2
Moderately good 3
Fair 4
Poor 5
Question and questionnaire
formats
Likert and forced-choice response
formats
Forced-choice response does not
allow for middle of the road or
undecided answer.
Response Category Issues
D.1 How satisfied are you with the effect of your treatment or
care?
Very satisfied …………………………………….... 1
Satisfied ……………………………………………... 2
Neither Satisfied nor dissatisfied …………… 3
Dissatisfied ……………………………………….…..4
Very dissatisfied …………………………............5
D.2 How satisfied are you with the explanations the doctor or
other health professional has given you about the results of
your treatment or care?
Very dissatisfied ……………………………..… 1
Dissatisfied ………………………………………… 2
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied …………… 3
Satisfied ……………………………………………. 4
Very satisfied ……………………………………… 5
Question and questionnaire
formats – open ended questions
What do you think is the main problem with
the average Pakistani diet?
What is the major source of stress in your life
at the moment
Respondents are free to answer according to
their own ideas
Form small groups and note the responses
you obtained from group members. How
would you classify and analyze this data?
What are some issues with open ended
questions?
Question and questionnaire
formats – open ended questions
Advantages
Useful for gathering new information
or a pilot study to refine Qs
Allows adequate answers to complex
issues
Allows the subject to ‘speak their
mind’
Question and questionnaire
formats – open ended questions
Disadvantages
Time consuming for respondent
Difficult to code and analyze
‘Irrelevant’ information may be
provided
Requires greater literacy
Different level of detail in answer
The wording and design of
questions
The writing of good questions is an art and it
is a time consuming one
Common problems are double barreled Qs,
leading or loaded Qs, ambiguity, and the
complexity of language used
To obtain valid and reliable responses one
needs well worded questions
Consider “ Do you smoke?” Yes/No. What are
some problems associated with this question.
Develop a better question concerning
smoking behavior.
The wording and design of
questions
There are a number of pitfalls to
avoid when writing questions for
questionnaires
1. Double barreled questions. Eg. Do
you like cars that are big and
powerful, or small and economical?
◦ These questions should be separated out
to be clear about what you need to know
The wording and design of
questions
Avoid
2. Long questions – cause confusion
and fatigue
3. Ambiguous questions. Avoid
vacuous words that may mean
different things to different people.
Eg. ‘old people’ may be 20 to a
toddler or 80 for a 50 year old. Be
specific about such matters
4. Inappropriate level of wording
◦No jargon or acronyms e.g. DIY
◦No double negatives
◦Keep it simple and concise
◦Appropriate readability/literacy
level for sample
◦Culture, age and gender
appropriateness
The wording and design of
questions
Avoid
5. Bias and leading questions
◦ The wording should not lead the respondent to
answer in a particular way (e.g. social desirability)
◦ Eg. ‘How often do you eat chocolate?’ This may
prompt some people to be less than truthful in
answering such a question.
◦ The response format may be biased too if it does
not accurately reflect the true behavior
◦ Eg. □ 1/month □ 1/week □ 1/day
The person may be eating it 3 times per day
The wording and design of
questions
The possibility of an invalidly
administered questionnaire
A survey on ‘attitudes to migration’
might be answered less than
honestly by respondents if the
interviewer is obviously of immigrant
background
A patient satisfaction survey
interview administered by the
treating Dr may have similar
Guidelines
Are the words simple, direct, and
familiar to all respondents? (avoid
technical jargon, consider regional or
cultural differences in word usage
etc)
Is the Q as clear and specific as
possible? Can it be shortened with no
loss of meaning?
Are any items double barreled?
Guidelines
Are the Qs leading or loaded?
Avoid colloquial terms
Avoid emotionally charged terms
(e.g. reds, black leaders etc.)
Is the Q applicable to all respondents
(e.g. how old is your wife; what is
your present occupation)
The Structure of
questionnaires
1.Introductory statement
◦Purpose of the questionnaire –
benefits that will flow from it
◦Information sought
◦How the information will be used
◦Introduces researcher
◦Confidentiality/anonymity
◦Contact for queries and complaints
The Structure of
questionnaires
2. Demographic questions
◦Age, sex, education history etc – good
to use examples from ABS
◦These are usually put first to warm-up
respondents – these are easy to answer
3. Factual background questions
◦Eg. Height, weight, smoking behavior
etc
◦Also helps to warm up respondents
The Structure of
questionnaires
4.
Opinion questions
◦ Questions requiring reflection
should be positioned after the
demographic and factual questions
◦Avoid conditional questions as
much as possible
5.Closing statements and return
instructions
◦This usually has statements
regarding thanks for participation
◦Provide information on how to
return the questionnaire
◦Possibility of taking up issues with
the researchers
Summary
Questionnaires are useful tools if
properly designed and administered
Well constructed questionnaires can
yield valuable and often novel
information relatively inexpensively
A questionnaire is a vehicle allowing
communication between the
researcher and the subject
A good questionnaire is the product
of testing and retesting
Where ever possible, construct or
use a valid and reliable tool, or test
its validity and reliability