Data Analysis/Interpretation: Describing Data, Confidence Intervals, Correlation
Data Analysis/Interpretation: Describing Data, Confidence Intervals, Correlation
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
Example of Skewed
Distribution
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
Step 2: Summarizing Data
• If data appears to “make sense” in Step
1, we proceed to Step 2
• Summarizing/describing the data
– Descriptive Statistics
– Info typically goes in Methods or beginning
of Results sections-- help describe what
our data “looks like” to the reader
Summarizing Data
continued...
• Measurements involved in summarizing data:
• Central Tendency
– Mean, median, mode
• Variability/dispersion
– Range, standard deviation
– Standard error of the mean
• Measures of effect size
– Strength of relationship/effect between IV’s and
DV’s
Step 3: Confirm What the
Data Reveal
• Use confidence interval (CI) for a population
parameter
• Margin of error-- our sample provides an
estimation of a population value; possibility
for error in our sample
• Usually with psychology use .95 probability (p
< .05)
– We can be 95% sure the value for the population
falls within these numbers/percentage (margin of
error)
Example of Confidence
Interval
CI continued...
• Different calculations of CI:
• CI for a Single Mean
• CI for Comparison Between
Independent Group Means
• CI for Comparison Between Means in a
Repeated Measures Design
CI for a Single Mean
• One variable/score
• 95% sure the CI contains true
population mean
– e.g., estimating GPA of all DePaul students
based on GPA of students in this class
– 95% sure it is between 3.1 and 3.4
CI for Comparison Between
Independent Group Means
• 95% sure CI contains true population mean
difference
– E.g., estimating GPA of Psychology majors versus
History majors, versus Chemistry majors
• Width of CI provides info about effect size
• Determine whether CI of mean difference
includes possible score of 0
– If so, there may be no population difference
CI for Comparison Between
Means in a Repeated
Measure Design
• Same sample/participants studied over
numerous trials
– E.g., DePaul students’ GPA when they were
freshmen, sophomores, juniors
• Nonoverlapping CI between groups/times
suggests sample means are not the same--
true difference
• Overlapping CI between groups/times--
uncertain whether there is a difference
CI for Comparison Between
Means in Repeated Measure
Design
QuickTimeª and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Notes about CI
• You can change CI
– Higher the CI, the less specific your
estimate will be
– E.g., 95% CI versus 99% CI
• Need to include larger margin of error to
include possible values
• Increasing sample size will improve
estimate of mean (decreases standard
error of the mean)