0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views16 pages

Bibliography

The document outlines five research traditions in media and communication: Positivist/Quantitative, Phenomenological/Qualitative, Administrative, Critical, and Pragmatic traditions. It discusses the common factors in conducting research, including data gathering, processing, analysis, presentation, and interpretation. Each tradition has its own approach to research, focusing on different aspects such as measurement, interpretation, practical application, and challenging the status quo.

Uploaded by

boluwatife.ajayi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views16 pages

Bibliography

The document outlines five research traditions in media and communication: Positivist/Quantitative, Phenomenological/Qualitative, Administrative, Critical, and Pragmatic traditions. It discusses the common factors in conducting research, including data gathering, processing, analysis, presentation, and interpretation. Each tradition has its own approach to research, focusing on different aspects such as measurement, interpretation, practical application, and challenging the status quo.

Uploaded by

boluwatife.ajayi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Research Traditions in

Media/Communication

 Research tradition(s) is otherwise


known as research orientation(s).

 It is the APPROACH adopted in


conducting research. Here we are
talking about what research method(s)
is/are adopted, what research design
is/are adopted, what data gathering
method(s) and analysis is/are adopted
and what way/form is/are adopted in
reporting your study.
Research Traditions in
Media/Communication

 Generally, there are FIVE research


traditions in Communication research.
These are:
 1. Positivist/Quantitative tradition
 2. Phenomenological/Qualitative
tradition
 3. Administrative tradition
 4. Critical tradition
 5. Pragmatic tradition
Research Traditions in
Media/Communication

 Note however that whatever the


tradition adopted there are some
common factors in conducting research.
These factors are:
 1. Data gathering
 2. Data processing
 3. Data analysis
 4. Data presentation
 5. Data interpretation
Data Gathering

 This is simply gathering your data. You


can gather your data in many ways.
These include:
 1. Going to the field, 2. Browse data
sites
 3. Scrapping data webs, 4. Crowd
sourcing
 5. Ask a forum, 6. Ask a mailing list
 7. Join hacks/hackers, 8. Learn from
govt IT
 9. write FOI request, 10. Definitive
research
Data Processing

 Thisis simply refinement of data. Data


processing involves: organise data into
rows/columns that is use of spread
sheets/statistical soft wares. Data
processing is transformations of
observation gathered into system of
categories and translations of the
categories into codes amenable to
analysis
Data Analysis

 Thisis further refinement of data for the


purpose of making logical decisions. It
involves inspecting, cleaning,
transforming and modelling data. The
goal is to discover useful information
suggesting conclusions and supporting
decision.
Data Analysis

 You analyse data to describe,


summarise, compare, identify
relationship, identify differences,
forecast outcomes etc. tools of data
analysis are: measures of central
tendency, measures of dispersion,
normal distribution, sampling,
correlation-causation regression, pivot
tables etc
Data Presentation

 Thisinvolves the use of tables, graphs,


charts, bar charts, histogram, pictogram
etc.
Data Interpretation

 It is the process of making sense of


collected data which has been
processed, analysed, and presented.
Stating the implication of data.

 Note that your interpretation of data


MUST be done in parsimonious ways as
possible.
Positivist/Quantitative
tradition

 This is otherwise known as


INFERENTIAL research. This is the
analysis of phenomenon involving
measurement of variables. It uses
statistical methods to examine and
explain variables.
Phenomenological/Qualitative
Tradition

 This is otherwise known as


INTERPRETIVE research. It is the
description of phenomenon or analysis
of same that does not depend on
measurement of variables. The
approach does not use statistical
methods in examining and explaining
variables
Administrative tradition

 These are researches conducted to gain


information for assessment,
management or improvement
purposes. Administrative tradition is
applied research. The aim could be for
quality assurance, program evaluation,
product improvement, advertising
influence, price-quality relationship,
product acceptance, etc.
Critical tradition

 Critical tradition is a reflective


challenge of unjust discourse. It is an
analytical or probing orientation. The
aim is to ascertain the why, what,
when, who, where and the how of
phenomena. Critical tradition is
opposed to perpetuation of hegemonic
power or influence on the generality via
the use of communication.
Critical tradition

 Thistradition challenges the status quo.


For instance there is what we called
news room socialization in
communication science. News room
socialisation spelts out ways of
behaving (documented) in the news
room. However if you are conducting a
study into news room socialisation
based on the present day realities and
advancement in technology that is
CRITICAL tradition in research. It simply
challenges the status quo.
Pragmatic Tradition

 This research orientation evaluates


theories or beliefs in terms of the
success of their practical application. It
considers the practical effect of the
objects of your conception. This
tradition preaches that practicality of
ideas be accepted and impracticality be
rejected
Pragmatic Tradition

A great example of pragmatic tradition


in communication science is the study
of EFFECTS. Another good example is
the spiral of silence theory of Elizabeth
Noelle Newman.

You might also like