0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views34 pages

Automata

The document provides an overview of Deterministic Finite Automata (DFA), including their structure, operation, and the languages they can recognize. It discusses the concepts of regular languages, operations on these languages, and presents theorems regarding their closure properties. Additionally, it addresses the limitations of DFAs in recognizing certain languages, using examples and proofs to illustrate these points.

Uploaded by

vankireddi.s2023
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views34 pages

Automata

The document provides an overview of Deterministic Finite Automata (DFA), including their structure, operation, and the languages they can recognize. It discusses the concepts of regular languages, operations on these languages, and presents theorems regarding their closure properties. Additionally, it addresses the limitations of DFAs in recognizing certain languages, using examples and proofs to illustrate these points.

Uploaded by

vankireddi.s2023
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Deterministic

Finite
Automata
Let me show you a
machine so simple
that you can
understand it in
less than two
minutes
11 1
0
0,1
1
0111 111 1
0 0

The machine accepts a string if the


process ends in a double circle
Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Anatomy of a Deterministic Finite
Automaton 1
0
0,1
states accept states (F)
1
q1

0 0

q0 q12

The machine accepts a string if the


start state (q0) ends in
process q3a double circle
states
Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Anatomy of a Deterministic Finite
Automaton

q1 1
0
0,1
1
q0 q2

0 0
The alphabet of a finite automaton is the
set where the symbols come from: 1
{0,1}
q3
The language of a finite automaton is the
set of strings thatwww.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
itSteven
accepts
Rudich:
q0 0,1

L(M) =All
 strings of 0s and 1s

The Language of Machine M

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
0 0

1
q0 q1
1

{ w | w has an even number of 1s}


L(M) =

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Notation
An alphabet Σ is a finite set (e.g., Σ = {0,1})

A string over Σ is a finite-length sequence of


elements of Σ

For x a string, |x| isthe length of x

The unique string of length 0 will be


denoted by ε and will be called the empty or
null string
A language over Σ is a set of strings over Σ
Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
A finite automaton is a 5-tuple M = (Q, Σ, , q0, F)
Q is the set of states
Σ is the alphabet
 : Q  Σ → Q is the transition
function
q0  Q is the start state
F  Q is the set of accept states

L(M) = the language of machine M


= set of all strings machine M
accepts
Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
M = (Q, Σ, , q0, F) Q = {q0, q1, q2, q3}
where
Σ = {0,1}
 : Q  Σ → Q transition function *
q0  Q is start state
F = {q1, q2}  Q accept states


0
q1
0,1
1
* q0
0
q0
1
q1
1
q1 q2 q2
q0
M q2
0 0 q2 q3 q2
1 q3 q0 q2
q3
Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Build an automaton that accepts all and
only those strings that contain 001

0,1
1 0

0 0 1
q q0 q00 q001
1

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
A language is regular if it is
recognized by a deterministic
finite automaton

L = { w | w contains 001} is regular


L = { w | w has an even number of 1s} is regular

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Union Theorem
Given two languages, L1 and L2,
define the union of L1 and L2 as
L1  L2 = { w | w  L1 or w  L2 }

Theorem: The union of two regular


languages is also a regular
language

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Theorem: The union of two regular
languages is also a regular
language
Proof Sketch: Let
M1 = (Q1, Σ, 1, 1q0, F1) be finite automaton for
L1
2
and
M2 = (Q2, Σ, 2, q0, F2) be finite automaton for
We
L2 want to construct a finite automaton
M = (Q, Σ, , q0, F) that recognizes L = L1 
L2

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Idea: Run both M1 and M2 at the same
time!
Q= pairs of states, one from M1 and one from M2
= { (q1, q2) | q1  Q1 and q2  Q2 }
= Q1  Q2

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Theorem: The union of two regular
languages is also a regular
language
0
0

1
q0 q1
1 1
1

0
p0 p1
Steven Rudich:
0
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Automaton for Union
1
q0,p0 q1,p0
1

0 0
0 0

1
q0,p1 q1,p1
1

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Automaton for
Intersection
1
q0,p0 q1,p0
1

0 0
0 0

1
q0,p1 q1,p1
1

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Theorem: The union of two regular
languages is also a regular
language
Corollary: Any finite language is
regular

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
The Regular Operations
Union: A  B = { w | w  A or w  B }

Intersection: A  B = { w | w  A and w  B }

Reverse: AR = { w1 …wk | wk …w1  A }

Negation: A = { w | w  A }

Concatenation: A  B = { vw | v  A and w  B }

Star: A* = { w1 …wk | k ≥ 0 and each wi  A }

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
Regular Languages Are
Closed Under The
Regular Operations
We have seen part of the proof for
Union. The proof for intersection is
very similar. The proof for negation is
easy.

Steven Rudich:
www.cs.cmu.edu/~rudich
The “Grep” Problem
Input: Text T of length t, string S of length n
Problem: Does string S appear inside text T?
Naïve method:

a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, …, at

Cost: Roughly nt comparisons


Automata Solution
Build a machine M that accepts any
string with S as a consecutive substring

Feed the text to M

Cost:t comparisons + time to build M

As luck would have it, the Knuth, Morris,


Pratt algorithm builds M quickly
Real-life Uses of DFAs
Grep

Coke Machines

Thermostats (fridge)

Elevators

Train Track Switches

Lexical Analyzers for Parsers


Are all
languages
regular?
Consider the language L = { anbn | n > 0 }
i.e., a bunch of a’s followed by an
equal number of b’s
No finite automaton accepts this language
Can you prove this?
anbn is not
regular. No
machine has
enough states to
keep track of the
number of a’s it
might encounter
That is a fairly weak
argument

Consider the following


example…
L = strings where the # of occurrences
of the pattern ab is equal to the
number of occurrences of the pattern
ba

Can’t be regular. No machine has


enough states to keep track of the
number of occurrences of ab
b
a
b
a a

b a
a
b
b

M accepts only the strings with


an equal number of ab’s and
ba’s!
Let me show you a
professional strength
proof that anbn is not
regular…
Pigeonhole principle:
Given n boxes and m >
n objects, at least one
box must contain more
than one object

Letterbox principle:
If the average number
of letters per box is x,
then some box will
have at least x letters
(similarly, some box
has at most x)
Theorem: L= {anbn | n > 0 } is not regular
Proof (by contradiction):
Assume that L is regular
Then there exists a machine M with k
states that accepts L
For each 0  i  k, let Si be the state M is
in after reading ai
$i,j  k such that Si = Sj, but i  j
M will do the same thing on aibi and ajbi
But a valid M must reject ajbi and accept aibi
Deterministic Finite
Automata
• Definition
• Testing if they accept a string
• Building automata

Regular Languages
• Definition
• Closed Under Union,
Here’s
What You Intersection, Negation
• Using Pigeonhole Principle to
Need to
Know… show language ain’t regular

You might also like