Scribd
Upload
3 views

Introduction

The Tejeros Assembly was a significant event in the Philippine Revolution that exposed internal conflicts between the Katipunan factions, particularly between the Magdiwang and Magdalo groups. Key figures like Andres Bonifacio and Artemio Ricarte provided conflicting accounts of the assembly, highlighting issues of manipulation and disagreement over leadership. Ultimately, the assembly set the stage for Emilio Aguinaldo's rise to power, despite Bonifacio's rejection of its legitimacy, illustrating the complexities of the revolution and its historical implications.

Uploaded by

klydescultor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views

Introduction

The Tejeros Assembly was a significant event in the Philippine Revolution that exposed internal conflicts between the Katipunan factions, particularly between the Magdiwang and Magdalo groups. Key figures like Andres Bonifacio and Artemio Ricarte provided conflicting accounts of the assembly, highlighting issues of manipulation and disagreement over leadership. Ultimately, the assembly set the stage for Emilio Aguinaldo's rise to power, despite Bonifacio's rejection of its legitimacy, illustrating the complexities of the revolution and its historical implications.

Uploaded by

klydescultor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

The Tejeros Assembly and Its

Conflicting Accounts

Presented By
INTRODUCTION
The Tejeros Assembly was a pivotal event in the Philippine Revolution
that showcased the internal divisions among the Katipunan factions. This
lesson focused on understanding the conflicting views surrounding the
assembly, the roles of key figures involved, and how these events were
documented through the accounts of various historical figures.
Lesson Learning Outcomes:

In this lesson, students were expected to:


• Identify the conflicting views about the Tejeros Assembly.
• Examine the role of each person involved as a source of information regarding the
event.
• Formulate arguments to support their stance through position papers using primary
and secondary sources.
Historical Context of the Tejeros Assembly
The Philippine Revolution was initially marked by setbacks for the Katipunan, particularly in Manila, where the
Spanish forces managed to defeat the revolutionaries. However, in Cavite, the revolutionaries under Emilio
Aguinaldo managed to score significant victories against the Spanish. This victory, however, led to internal
conflict between two factions of the Katipunan: Magdiwang (led by Andres Bonifacio) and Magdalo (led by
Emilio Aguinaldo). The two groups were at odds over territory, leadership, and logistical concerns.
In March 1897, a meeting was convened in Tejeros (a town in Cavite) to resolve these issues. The assembly was
intended to establish a revolutionary government that would lead the revolution against the Spanish. However,
tensions between the Magdiwang and Magdalo factions quickly escalated during the assembly, resulting in
significant conflict and division.
Key Figures and Their Accounts of the Tejeros
Assembly:

1.Artemio Ricarte’s Account: General Artemio Ricarte, a key figure in


the Magdiwang faction, served as the secretary of the assembly. Ricarte was later
elected as Captain-General of the revolutionary government. His account of
the Tejeros Assembly highlights the chaotic nature of the meeting, the
disagreements between the factions, and the eventual election of new leaders.
Ricarte’s recollections focus on the tension between the two factions and the
controversial election processes that followed.

Key Highlights from Ricarte's Account:


• The initial session of the assembly began under the presidency of Jacinto
Lumbreras, but Bonifacio later assumed the presidency after Lumbreras stepped
down.
• The assembly was marked by intense debates, particularly around the form of
government to be established.
• Ricarte was elected Captain-General but protested the decision, which was eventually
overruled.
• The assembly’s elections were marred by conflict, especially when Daniel Tirona, a
Magdalo representative, insulted Andres Bonifacio by suggesting that only a lawyer
could occupy the position of Minister of the Interior. This led to Bonifacio drawing his
revolver in a moment of anger, though he was disarmed.

2.Andres Bonifacio’s Account: Bonifacio’s account, written in a letter to Emilio Jacinto,


offers a detailed view of his perspective on the events. Bonifacio, the Supremo of the
Katipunan, expressed his disappointment with the assembly, feeling that the proceedings
were undermined by the Magdalo faction’s manipulation. He also criticized the disregard for
earlier agreements, such as the need for representatives from all provinces to be present at
the assembly.
Key Highlights from Bonifacio's Account:
• Bonifacio opposed the election of Emilio Aguinaldo as president, believing
that the assembly had been manipulated by factions to favor certain
individuals.

• Bonifacio’s pride was wounded when Daniel Tirona questioned his


qualifications to serve as Minister of the Interior. This led to the infamous
incident where Bonifacio drew his revolver on Tirona.

• Bonifacio ultimately declared the assembly null and void, rejecting the
election results and refusing to recognize the new government.
3.Santiago Alvarez’s Account: General Santiago Alvarez, another key figure in the
Magdalo faction, provided his account of the Tejeros Assembly in his memoirs. His account
corroborates some of Ricarte’s observations but also provides additional context,
particularly from the Magdalo faction’s perspective. Alvarez’s narrative reveals the
factionalism and strategic maneuvering that took place during the assembly.

Key Highlights from Alvarez's Account:


• Alvarez noted the presence of key figures from both the Magdiwang and Magdalo
factions, highlighting the strategic positioning of the two groups.
• He described the tensions surrounding the election of the new government officials and
the role of Daniel Tirona in sowing discord.
• Alvarez also mentioned that there were pre-arranged plans to elect Aguinaldo as
president, which Bonifacio contested.
Analysis of the Assembly:
The Tejeros Assembly revealed deep divisions within the revolutionary
movement. The Magdalo faction, led by Aguinaldo, had a clear agenda to
consolidate power, while the Magdiwang faction, led by Bonifacio, resisted
this shift. Bonifacio’s rejection of the assembly’s legitimacy stemmed from his
belief that the process was biased and that the Magdalo faction had unfairly
manipulated the election.
The assembly also marked a pivotal moment in the Philippine Revolution, as
it laid the groundwork for the eventual leadership of Emilio Aguinaldo.
Despite Bonifacio’s objections, the assembly set the stage for Aguinaldo’s
rise to power, which would have significant consequences for the revolution.
Conclusion:
The conflicting accounts of the Tejeros Assembly highlight the complexities of
the Philippine Revolution and the internal strife that hindered the unity of the
revolutionaries. While figures like Bonifacio and Ricarte saw the assembly as
a betrayal of the revolution’s ideals, the Magdalo faction, led by
Aguinaldo, viewed it as a necessary step toward establishing a more organized
government. These differing perspectives continue to shape the historical
understanding of the Tejeros Assembly and its role in Philippine history.By
analyzing the varying accounts of the key participants, students gain a deeper
understanding of the revolution’s internal conflicts and the challenges faced by
the revolutionaries in their struggle for independence.
THANK YOU

You might also like