Org Change 17 Dec
Org Change 17 Dec
1. Questionnaires
2. Interviews
3. Observations
4. Unobtrusive methods
1. Questionnaires
Advantages Disadvantages
Draw from large Preset questions may not target
samples/groups of the real issues
respondents Data can be misinterpreted or
Attract and accommodate overinterpreted
large quantities of data Respondets can misinterpret
Relatively inexpensive questions
Subject to response bias
The activity isn’t time-bound
(including deliberate
misinformation)
2. Interviews
Advantages
Flexibility – allows discretion re pursuing themes and further
clarification
Primary and rich data
Can build rapport with subjects, in which case more honest
and frank disclosure is possible
May be individual or group-oriented
Focus groups popular: can uncover info. on specific matters
and in great depth. In this form, the process can be quite
economical
2. Interviews
Disadvantages
Substantial time to plan, conduct and
analyse, with potential complications in
interpretation of outcomes
Comparative silence - ‘sleepers’ in group
interviews (focus groups) means some
views may not be aired. The prevailing
views then may not reflect accurately the
group view
Bias on the part of interviewer or
respondent(s)
3. Observations
A direct way of collecting data
Feature organisational behaviours in their usual functional
settings
Observer can be group member or completely detached from
the group or situation
If carried out ‘properly’ need not impinge on or influence
normal operations
This data collection method requires care/skill
3. Observations
Advantages Disadvantages
Yields data on actual Meaning behind observed
behaviour behaviours can be
Free of bias associated difficult to determine
Observer bias possible
with self-reporting
Sampling issues (see
Focus on the present
Waddell et al 2011, p.
whereas other methods
148)
tend to be retrospective Can be expensive
Observer can readily
change point of focus
4. Unobtrusive measures
Advantages Disadvantages
Non-reactive, no Access and retrieval
response bias difficulties (data in a form
High face validity: can that’s useful to the company
but not the consultant
be used to cross-
recording procedures are
check
subject to change, which
Easily quantified and
can make validity of data
reflect ‘legitimacy’ questionable
Coding and interpretation
difficulties
Sampling-type concerns
Qualitative tools
Content analysis
Force-field analysis
Quantitative tools
Means, standard deviations and frequency
distributions
Scattergrams and correlation coefficients
Difference tests
Feeding Back Diagnostic Information
Characteristics of effective feedback
Appropriate power
Members need to be clear on which decisions are
already made, where they have some discretion or
input, and to what extent?
Little real power to influence changes means little
ownership of the data (or the problem)
Process help
Equates to active assistance from the consultant to
work through the issues collectively
Survey feedback steps
Ambiguity of purpose
Difficulty reaching consensus
Distrust
High levels of distrust in the organisation can
render the survey feedback ineffective
Unacceptable topics
Organisational disturbance
Summary
Data Gathering
questionnaires, interviews, observation, unobtrusive measures
Sampling concerns
Data Analysis
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods
Characteristics of effective feedback
Characteristics of the feedback process
Survey feedback (steps & limitations)