0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views16 pages

230 Classification Systematics

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views16 pages

230 Classification Systematics

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Bio.

230 --- Classification,


Taxonomy, Nomenclature
Taxonomy / Systematics / Classify
What are Taxonomy* and Systematics*?

What is a Phylogenetic Survey?

What is Phylogeny*?

What is Ontogeny*?
Basic Classification Hierarchy*
- DOMAIN
- KINGDOM
- DIVISION or PHYLUM
- CLASS
- ORDER
- FAMILY
- GENUS
- SPECIES
(many levels can have sublevels: e.g. subfamily)
Basic Classification Hierarchy
- DOMAIN (Eukarya)
- KINGDOM (Animalia)
- DIVISION or PHYLUM (Chordata)
- SUBPHYLUM (Vertebrata)
- CLASS (Mammalia)
- ORDER (Primate)
- FAMILY (Hominidae)
- GENUS (Homo)
- SPECIES (Homo sapiens)
(many levels can have sublevels: e.g. subfamily)
Taxon / Taxa
What is a TAXON* (pl. taxa)?????
NO ABSOLUTE way to determine if
something should be a genus, a
family or a phylum
Still there is much agreement as to
what goes in a group such as GREEN
ALGAE or FLOWERING PLANTS or
BACTERIA
Position in the Hierarchy
There is no ABSOLUTE rank in a hierarchy!
(No ABSOLUTE way to determine
position in a hierarchy)
Despite this most authorities are in
general agreement how to organize
species into higher taxa
An example (using families)
Solanaceae Sphecidae
How might “experts” differ in the
above examples?
The Species
The only taxon that has ‘biological
reality’
Human Beings (a species)
What is our scientific name?
Species: Homo sapiens Linnaeus
Genus: Homo
Specific Epithet: sapiens
Genus + Specific Epithet = Species
Author Citation: Linnaeus
Classify / Classification (I)
GOAL: a natural* classification
A Classification*: information storage
and retrieval system
What type of information to use?
Everything and anything
 (morphology, anatomy, distribution,
cytology, genetics, DNA homologies,
behaviors, etc.)
Classify / Classification (II)
Why do we look down on classification
activities and disciplines (taxonomy and
systematics)?
Why do classification schemes keep on
changing?
Why are taxonomy and systematics
more important than ever?
Nomenclature
Naming things
Why a system of Nomenclature*?
Why scientific names? Why not just
use common names?
Binomial System
Why latinized names?
Very specific rules --- Why is this important?
Rules (name endings, etc.) currently differ
for plants vs. animals --- Why?
Classification Hierarchy Revisited
- ALL LIVING THINGS (= Storage Building)
- DOMAIN (= a floor in the building)
- KINGDOM (= large storage room)
- DIVISION or PHYLUM (= file cabinet)
- CLASS (= drawer)
- ORDER (= large file folder)
- FAMILY (= smaller folder in
the large folder)
- GENUS (= stapled packet)
- SPECIES (= single page)
Changing (?) Classifications I
How many Kingdoms?????
Two Three Five Six
Plantae Protista* Monera Archaebacteria
Animalia Plantae Protista* Eubacteria
Animalia Fungi Protista*
Plantae Fungi
Animalia Plantae
Animalia
What is the difference?????
*Protista also known as Protoctista
Changing (?) Classifications II
Changing (?) Classifications III
The three DOMAIN system:
Not really that different
Archaea are in one domain
Bacteria are in the second domain
All eukaryotes are in the third domain
Kingdoms are the next subdivision
below the domain
The Protists
An ‘unnatural’ group
At the moment it is a ‘collect all’ (like
a junk drawer)
If it isn’t a plant, animal, fungus,
archaean or bacterium, then it is a
Protist
 In time, as we learn more, we will take
things out of this group and then there
may be more kingdoms, phyla, etc.

You might also like