Module-2
Module-2
MODULE-2
www.cambridge.edu.in
Literature Review and Technical Reading
The significance can normally be from the point of view that there is
indeed an existing problem and that it is known by looking at what
already exists in the field.
The existing knowledge is needed to make the case that there is a
problem and that it is important.
One can infer that the knowledge that is sought to be produced does
not yet exist by describing what other knowledge already exists and by
pointing out that this part is missing so that what we have is original.
To do this, one again needs the existing knowledge: the context, the
significance, the originality, and the tools.
Normally, one finds this knowledge by reading and surveying the
literature in the field that was established long ago and also about the
more recent knowledge which is in fact always changing.
This is not at all the case with a research paper where the goal is normally to
present a small piece of new knowledge, and that new knowledge will not
have stood the test of time in the same way as the knowledge in a textbook
would have.
The research paper is written for other researchers out on the edge of
knowledge and it assumes that the reader already knows a lot in that field.
A researcher may find oneself continually going back to other sources to try
and interpret what is going on in a particular research paper.
It can be difficult to find the right work to read, but the objective with all
this reading and learning is to be able to get the knowledge that one needs to
build the foundation.
Department of computer science And Engineering www.cambridge.edu.in
New and Existing Knowledge
It is always good to be suspicious of the claims made in the sources that
have been thoroughly reviewed, especially in the case of tall claims.
If one is amenable to easily accept whatever is available in the
literature, one may find it difficult to go beyond it in one’s own work
and may also fail to carefully analyze with a suspicious bent of mind
one’s own results subsequently.
The goal of literature survey is to bring out something new to work on
through the identification of unsolved issues, determine the problems in
the existing models or experimental designs, and present a novel idea
and recommendations.
No matter where one gets the available information, one needs to
critically evaluate each resource that the researcher wishes to cite.
This methodology analyzes available materials to determine
suitability for the intended research.
Relying on refereed articles published in scholarly journals or granted
patents can save the researcher a lot of time.
Here are a few criteria that could help the researcher in the evaluation of the
information under study:
Authority: What are the author’s credentials and affiliation? Who publishes the
information?
Accuracy: Based on what one already knows about the topic or from reading
other sources, does the information seem credible? Does the author cite other
sources in a reference list or bibliography, to support the information presented?
Scope: Is the source at an appropriate comprehension or research level?
There are other criteria to consider as well, such as currency, objectivity, and
purpose. It is important to ensure that the search question is neither too narrow
nor too broad.
Web of Science:
Web of Science includes multiple databases, as well as specialized
tools.
It is a good search tool for scholarly materials requiring institutional
license and allows the researcher to search in a particular topic of
interest, which can be made by selection in fields that are available in
drop down menu such as title, topic, author, address, etc.
The tool also allows sorting by number of citations (highest to lowest),
publication date.
Web of Science:
Put quotes around phrases, add more keywords, or use the “Refine
Results” panel on the left to narrow down the search by keyword,
phrases in quotation marks, type of material such as peer-reviewed
journal articles, date, language, and more.
Expanding the search results is possible by looking for alternate word
endings, breaking the search concepts down, thinking of alternate
search terms (including scientific names if applicable) and connecting
them with OR, and using the database’s features for finding additional
references.
Web of Science:
Web of Science:
“Cited reference search” option enables a researcher to trace articles
which have cited a formerly published paper.
Using this element, it is possible to find how a familiar idea has been
applied, improved, or extended subsequently.
A structured search like this that enables narrowing and refining what
one is looking for is effective to ensure that the results throw up
relevant sources and time spent in studying those is likely to be well
utilized.
It is now imperative for any active researcher to keep oneself stay up
to date with research outcomes in their field of interest.
Finding the right work to read can be difficult.
The literature where knowledge is archived is very fragmented and
there are bits and pieces all over the place.
The number of papers relevant to a particular researcher is very few,
compared to the actual number of research papers available from peer-
reviewed technical sources.
If the paper has continued to be of interest, then one is now ready to
delve into the Introduction section to know the background information
about the work and also to ascertain why the authors did that particular
study and in what ways the paper furthers the state of the art.
The next sections to read are the Results and Discussion sections which
is really the heart of the paper.
One should really read further sections like the Experimental
Setup/Modeling, etc., only if one is really interested and wishes to
understand exactly what was done to better understand the meaning of
the data and its interpretation.
As one works through the literature in this way, one should consider
not only the knowledge that is written down but also the reputation of
the people who made that knowledge.
A researcher always need to search for the relevant literature and keep
up to date with it.
During smaller scope the researcher should take help from supervisor
who is expert in the particular field.
A researcher reads to write and writes well only if the reading skills
are good.
The bridge between reading and actually writing a paper is the act of
taking notes during and shortly after the process of reading.
Many researchers take notes on the margins of their copies of papers
or even digitally on an article aggregator tool.
On completing a thorough reading, a good technical reading should
end with a summary of the paper in a few sentences describing the
contributions.
A thorough reading should bring out whether there are new ideas in
the paper, or if existing ideas were implemented through experiments
or in a new application, or if different existing ideas were brought
together under a novel framework.
Citations (references) credit others for their work, while allowing the
readers to trace the source publication.
Citations applies to all forms of written sources in the form of texts,
images, sounds, etc.
Depending on the exact type of material, the researcher need to give
due credit to the creator of the original source.
The growth of knowledge in any field of study, especially in
technological fields, is primarily incremental and a researcher
invariably and naturally builds upon prior information.
There are certain cases when references do not fulfill the actual goal of citations
and acknowledgments, and thus do not benefit the reader:
Spurious Citations:
• In certain cases, when citation is not required or an appropriate one is not found, if the
author nevertheless goes ahead with including one anyways, it would be considered as
a spurious citation.
• These sorts of citations do not add any value to the reader in terms of properly
understanding the paper. Such actions result in loss of time of the reader or reviewer in
looking for the cited paper that is otherwise not relevant.
• Just as due credit should be given to a paper through citation, inappropriate credit must
be avoided so that the credibility of a research work or of the journal or conference
proceedings where that paper is published is not lost through this sort of carelessness.
There are certain cases when references do not fulfill the actual goal of
citations and acknowledgments, and thus do not benefit the reader:
Biased Citations:
• When authors cite the work of their friends or colleagues despite there
being no significant connection between the two works, or when they do
not cite work of genuine significance because they do not wish to give
credit in the form of citation to certain individuals, then such actions can
be classified as biased citations.
• Neglect of citations to prior work whose conclusions or data contradict
the current work is also biased.
There are certain cases when references do not fulfill the actual goal
of citations and acknowledgments, and thus do not benefit the
reader:
Self-Citations:
• Self-citation of prior papers is natural because the latest paper is often
a part of a larger research project which is ongoing.
• Sometimes, it is also advantageous for the reader because citations of
all the related works of the same author are given in one paper and this
may reduce the effort of the reader in trying to find the full versions of
those papers.
Department of computer science And Engineering www.cambridge.edu.in
Citations: Functions and Attributes
There are certain cases when references do not fulfill the actual goal of
citations and acknowledgments, and thus do not benefit the reader:
Self-Citations:
• However, there can also be negative impact on the journal as well as
individual researchers due to inappropriate and irrelevant self-citations.
• Self-citations in such cases may be either spurious or biased or even both.
• Editors of journals who ignore such types of citations and allow by
negligence or otherwise, to be included in published materials end up
directly or indirectly altering the impact factor of those publications.
There are certain cases when references do not fulfill the actual goal
of citations and acknowledgments, and thus do not benefit the reader:
Coercive Citations:
• Despite shortcomings, impact factors remain a primary method of
quantification of research.
• One side effect is that it creates an incentive for editors to indulge in
coercion to add citations to the editor’s journal.
• Even if not explicitly stated, the implied message is that the author
could either add citations or risk rejection. Such demands consequently
diminish the reputation of the journal.
Department of computer science And Engineering www.cambridge.edu.in
Impact of Title and Keywords on Citations
If maximum number of allowable keywords are used, then the chance
of the article being found increases and so does the probability of
citation count of the article.
Usage of new keywords should be minimal as such keywords may not
be well known to the research community and so may lead to low
visibility of the article.
Citing Datasets:
The nature of engineering research has evolved rapidly and now relies
heavily on data to justify claims and provide experimental evidences and
so data citations must fetch proper credit to the creator of the dataset as
citations of other objects like research articles.
Data citations should have provisions to give credit and legal
attribution to all contributors, enable identification and access, while
recognizing that a specific style may not apply to all data.
Citing Datasets:
A researcher should obtain necessary permission for using data from a
particular source.
Citations related to datasets should include enough information so that a
reader could find the same dataset again in the future, even if the link provided
no longer works.
In some case, certain individuals may help in the research work but may
not deserve to be included as authors.
As a sign of gratitude, such contributions should be acknowledged.
Acknowledgment can be classified into six different categories like
moral, financial, editorial, institutional or technical, and conceptual
support.