The document discusses the definition and types of historical sources, distinguishing between primary sources, which provide firsthand accounts, and secondary sources, which offer analysis and interpretation. It also covers the validity of sources through external and internal criticism, emphasizing the importance of evaluating authenticity and reliability. Additionally, it touches on the evolution of Philippine historiography and introduces the concept of 'pantayog pananaw,' which promotes a holistic perspective in understanding historical contexts.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views12 pages
RPH Lesson2
The document discusses the definition and types of historical sources, distinguishing between primary sources, which provide firsthand accounts, and secondary sources, which offer analysis and interpretation. It also covers the validity of sources through external and internal criticism, emphasizing the importance of evaluating authenticity and reliability. Additionally, it touches on the evolution of Philippine historiography and introduces the concept of 'pantayog pananaw,' which promotes a holistic perspective in understanding historical contexts.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12
Introduction to
History: Definition, Issues, Sources, and Methodology Historical Sources
they are the materials or evidence that
historians use to study the past. Historical sources can be documents, objects, or even oral traditions that help us understand what happened at different points in history. 2 types of Historical Sources Primary Sources: These are materials that were created during the time period being studied. They provide direct evidence about the past. • Examples: Diaries, letters, photographs, government records, newspaper articles from the time, speeches, official documents, and artifacts (like tools or clothing). 2 types of Historical Sources Secondary Sources: These are materials that interpret, analyze, or summarize primary sources. They are created after the events they describe and provide a second-hand account. • Examples: History books, documentaries, articles analyzing past events, biographies, and essays. Primary Sources Secondary Sources
Created at the time of the
Created after the event event
Provide firsthand accounts Provide analysis,
of history interpretation, or commentary
Examples: letters, photos, Examples: textbooks,
artifacts documentaries, reviews
Often more subjective Often more objective (based
(personal viewpoint) on research) Validity of Sources Criticism in historical sources refers to the process of evaluating the authenticity, credibility, and reliability of documents or materials used as evidence to reconstruct and interpret historical events. Historians scrutinize sources to assess their value and limitations in contributing to an accurate understanding of the past. 2 types of Criticism External criticism is the practice of verifying the authenticity of evidence by examining its physical characteristics; consistency with the historical characteristic of the time when it was produced, and the materials used for the evidence. Examples of the things that will be examined when conducting external criticism of a document include the quality of the paper, the type of the ink, and the language and words used in 2 types of Criticism Internal criticism, on the other hand, is the examination of the truthfulness of the evidence. It looks at the content of the source and examines the circumstance of its production. Internal criticism looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the author of the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge which informed it, and its intended purpose, among others. External Criticism Internal Criticism
Focuses on the physical and
Examines the content of the factual authenticity of the source for reliability and meaning. source.
Questions include: Is the
Questions include: Is the source information accurate? Does the genuine? When, where, and by author have biases? What was the whom was it created? context of the document's creation?
Examples of issues considered:
Looks at the author’s intentions, forgery, dating, authorship, and assumptions, and potential biases. origin. Philippine historiography underwent several changes since the precolonial period until the present. Ancient Filipinos narrated their history through communal songs and epics that they passed orally from a generation to another. When the Spaniards came, their chroniclers started recording their observations through written accounts. The perspective of historical writing and inquiry also shifted. The Spanish colonizers narrated the history of their colony in a bipartite view. Pantayog Pananaw "Pantayog pananaw" is a Filipino term that can be translated as "elevated perspective" or "holistic viewpoint." It refers to a way of looking at a situation or issue from a broader, more comprehensive, and higher perspective. This perspective encourages understanding things beyond the immediate or surface level, promoting a deeper and more inclusive approach to problem-solving or analysis. In a social or philosophical context, it can mean considering the interconnectedness of various elements, such as individual, community, and societal factors, in understanding a particular issue or concept. Thank You