0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views42 pages

Chapter 2

Uploaded by

andigeza3
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views42 pages

Chapter 2

Uploaded by

andigeza3
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Chapter Two

Public Procurement and


Framework Agreements
Objectives
• After completing this chapter the students are able to:
• Understand the concept of framework agreement
• Differentiate framework agreements from other
contracts
• Associate framework agreement contracts with that
of other contracts
• Understand the benefits of framework contracts
• Discuss on the challenges of framework agreement
contracts
Introduction
• The Framework agreement is often known as an
umbrella agreement.
• It is an agreement which is reached between two
parties to cover a long-term collaborative
arrangement.
• These are used typically where an employer has a
long-term program of work in mind and is looking
to set up a process to govern the individual
construction or supply packages.
• It allows an employer to instruct another party to
carry out works or provide services, by reference
to pre-agreed terms, over a (usually) pre-agreed
period of time.
The concept of a framework agreement is that:
– It is, essentially, an arrangement which establishes the
contractual terms.
– It will be applied by subsequent orders made for the
goods, services or works.
– It will be covered by the framework over the period of
time during which it is enforced.
• The law has clarified the position in terms of the
availability of framework agreements
• The law has introduced restrictions
• It also controls over their use and ambiguities
about the legal rules.
• Framework agreements, sometimes called
– Indefinite Quantity Contracts,
– Two-phase procurement instruments,
– The first competitive round generates sometimes one
but more often multiple awards to contractors.
– This framework agreement also managed by the
individual procuring entity
• The second round of competition, between one or
more of the contractors, from the qualified pool,
yields a specific contract with one of them to supply
the particular goods or services required.
• Second brief round of competition is used to choose
one of the contractors to handle each specific visit.
• The first round will generally include most of the
features of the request for proposals method of
procurement.
• The second round will generally resemble request for
quotations from the qualified group of contractors.
• Variations on this approach are possible, depending
on the number of contractors awarded a framework
agreement.
2.2. The meaning and definition of framework
agreement
• There is some confusion as to the precise
coverage of the rules on framework agreements.
• This confusion results primarily from lack of
clarity as to the use of the terms “framework
agreements” and “framework contracts”
• It is also because of whether or not framework
contracts are a type of public contract.
• The suggestion that a “framework contract” is
the same as any other public contract
• It seems to confuse the establishment of terms
for the delivery of works, services or supplies
with an obligation to provide, receive and pay
for those works, services or supplies.
• The term “binding” framework is used in the
very rare.
• The contracting authority must use the
framework agreement for any purchases it
wishes to make of the works, services or
supplies which form its subject-matter.
• The large number of non-binding “buying club”
framework agreements provides contracting
authorities with a wide choice of potential
suppliers.
• This means that contracting authorities are in a
position to “shop around” for the supplier that
offers the best deal.
• Framework agreements are sometimes
criticized as anti-competitive.
• It is because the first round of competition,
which yields no specific contract, resembles a
pre-qualification and not a full and open round
of competitive proposals.
• The second round involves price competition but
it is only limited to the pre-qualified suppliers
and contractors.
• Sometimes, in fact, procuring entities will only
involve one or two or three contractors in the
second round on the premise that full
competition has already taken place in the first
round.
• On the other hand, there are significant gains in
cost and efficiency
• Much of the preliminary work of the
procurement process is accomplished during the
first round, at little cost to the government.
• The second round, focused on specific tasks or
orders, is likely to generate substantially
competitive prices.
• Record keeping in this method of procurement is
particularly important, but a little bit complicated
because of the two rounds of competitive action.
A framework can be set up by:
• An individual contracting authority;
• A contracting authority acting on behalf of a
number of contracting authorities;
• Central purchasing body acting on behalf of
itself or a number of contracting authorities.
Can frameworks be applied for all procurements?
• Frameworks may not be suitable for all types of
purchasing
• contracting authorities need to be certain that a
framework will provide an economic and efficient
means of purchasing.
• The most appropriate use of frameworks is where
a contracting authority has a repeated requirement
for works, services or supplies,
• but it is used when the exact quantities are
unknown.
• Contracting authorities must be in a position to
manage a framework agreement,
• The needs of both the contracting authority or
the provider(s) must be met
• The operation of the framework agreement must
be closely monitored.
• Care must also be taken to ensure that
– framework agreements are not set up to distort
competition
– They are not improperly used.
What procedure is used for procuring a framework
agreement?
• Any one of the four main competitive procedures
may be used for procuring a frame-work
agreement
• Although it is most common to use the open or
restricted procedures.
• It is only when contracts are awarded under the
framework agreement that different;
• Framework agreement-specific provisions should
be apply.
• It should be noted that a framework agreement
is not a list of selected economic operators that
are qualified to provide the works, services or
supplies covered by the agreement.
• To be appointed to the frame-work agreement,
– economic operators will have to have both qualified
and submitted tenders,
– who are evaluated by the contracting authorities, and
– it is those tenders that will provide the basis for
future awards under the framework agreement
Framework Agreements in the Context of
Consulting Services (Indefinite Delivery
Contracts, Price Agreements or Standing Offers)
• Indefinite delivery contracts refer to contracts in
which an individual consulting firm or an
association of firms is hired for a specified time
period (usually three to five years) to undertake
tasks as and when the need arises.
• The specific workload is unknown at the outset;
• Indefinite delivery contracts are usually agreed
upon because it is anticipated that the services
will have two particular characteristics:
– Clients will need access to immediately available or
– on-call services for urgent assignments, and
– a lengthy competitive bidding process is impossible
because of external circumstances.
• These services could include experts for urgent
remedial actions in emergency situations caused
by natural calamities, wars, epidemic or
outbreaks.
– Each individual consultancy will be quite small,
– making an expensive competitive selection process
inefficient, although, when added together, the
amount of advice is substantial.
• These combined factors make it worthwhile to
appoint suitable consultants who can be on
standby and are called upon when needed.
• However, locking in one set of advisers over a
considerable period of time raises a number of
issues related to the selection of the consultants;
• Therefore, the quality and price of the services
proposed must be addressed.
• Since it is not known how often or for what
specific tasks the consultants will be called upon,
they may not be able to submit a plan of work or
a fixed total price.
• At the same time the long contract period and
the unknown activation dates mean that
consultants may always credibly claim that the
requested expert is not available.
• Administering an indefinite delivery contract
requires considerable time and energy from
Client’s staff, which must negotiate and
administer each delivery order.
Setting up a framework agreement - Early
considerations
• A framework agreement can be set up by
– one or more contracting authorities for their own use
or
– A central purchasing body for the use of other
contracting authorities.
• In either case, an agent may be employed to carry
out the processes of advertisement, selection and
award.
• In that event, liability for legal compliance remains
with the contracting authority or authorities.
• Where a group of contracting authorities has
collectively decided to set up a framework
agreement,
• The allocation of liability is the most important
matter for them to address as between
themselves.
2.6.1. Setting up framework agreements: the
starting premise

• As a matter of law, a framework agreement


can be set up by:
– One or more contracting authorities for
their own use; or
– A central purchasing body for the use of
other contracting authorities
• In either case, an agent may be employed to
carry out the processes of advertisement,
selection and award.
• In that event, liability for legal compliance
remains with the contracting authority or
authorities
2.6.2. Duration of framework agreements

• A framework agreement may not endure for more than


three to four years “except in exceptional
circumstances,
• In particular, circumstances relating to the subject of
the framework agreement.”
• For example in Ethiopia a maximum contract period for
the framework agreement is three years.
• This three-year rule exists to ensure that public
procurement markets are opened up periodically to
competition.
• Where any kind of justification for a longer
period than four years has to be justified in the
contract notice
2.7. Award of a framework agreement

Agreement with one economic operator:


• The framework agreement is with one economic
operator then the contracts are awarded within
the limits of the terms laid down in the
framework agreement.
• The contracting authority may request the
economic operator to supplement its tender if
necessary
• but there must be no substantial amendments to
the terms laid down in the framework
agreement.
Agreement with more than one economic
operator:
• Where the agreement is with more than one
economic operator, the contracting authority has
a choice.
• There are two ways of awarding a contract:
– Awarding the contract directly to a particular
economic operator; or
– Inviting all suitably qualified economic operators on
the framework to participate (a „mini-competition‟).
• Contracting authorities should make it clear
when setting up the multi-provider frame-work
– how contracts will be awarded, and
– How the framework agreement should include
provisions covering the manner of awarding the
contract.
• In both cases, the parties may under no
circumstances make
– substantial amendments to the terms laid down in the
framework agreement and
– the award must not be made improperly or in such a
way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.
Award to an economic operator without further
competition:
– Where the contracting authority wishes to award a
contract directly to one of the economic operators in
the framework
– then it must do so on the terms laid down in the
framework agreement.
Award following a mini-competition:
• The contracting authority may use the second
option of a mini-competition, where not all
terms are laid down in the framework
agreement.
• This process allows the terms referred to in
the specification to be introduced or existing
terms to be more precisely formulated.
• All qualified economic operators in the
framework must be invited to participate in a
competition on this basis so as to ensure
– equal treatment,
– non-discrimination and
– transparency.
• The Directive sets out the requirements for the
conduct of the mini-competition.
Who can call off contracts under a
framework agreement?
• Contracting authority must be an original party
to the framework agreement.
• As a minimum "original party" means that the
contracting authority must have been either:
– named in the contract notice;
– named in a document referenced in the contract
notice; or
– be an identifiable member of a class of contracting
authority named in the contract notice or a
document referenced in the notice.
• Calling off under a framework gives rise to two
principal issues:
– which framework supplier should get this particular
call off, and
– on what terms?
2.8. The advantages and the disadvantage of
framework agreement

• When you are procuring over a period of time,


a framework can deliver many benefits, such
as:
– The first benefit is contractual certainty.
– Reduced transaction costs;
– Continuous improvement within long-term
relationships;
– Better value and greater community wealth;
– Solutions that delight customers.
Discussion
• In what aspect procuring entities are using
framework agreement in their procurement
practice?
• What can be the major challenges to use
framework agreement in the public
procurement system?
• What other benefits can Framework agreement
bring in the public procurement system, if we
applied it in an individual procuring entity?
The End
Thank you

You might also like