100% found this document useful (1 vote)
21 views18 pages

1 - Eng 311 - Semantics - Lecture 6

Uploaded by

Ridwan Arif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
21 views18 pages

1 - Eng 311 - Semantics - Lecture 6

Uploaded by

Ridwan Arif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

English 311: Semantics

Course Instructor: Tania Rahman (TRn)

SENTENCE RELATIONS,
TRUTH & LOGIC

1
Overview
 Recap
 Truth
Logic and Truth
Entailment
Presupposition
 TAM:Tense, Aspect and Modality
 Mood and Evidentiality

2
Meanings can be related
A and B are synonymous (B is the paraphrase
of A): A means the same as B
My brother is a bachelor
My brother has never married.
A entails B: if we know A then we know B
The child killed the cat.
The cat is dead.
A contradicts B: A is inconsistent with B
Fred has long hair.
Fred is bald.

3
A presupposes B: B is part of the assumed background of A
The King of Pop is dead.
There was a King of Pop
I regret eating your lunch.
I ate your lunch.
A is necessarily true — tautology: A is true but not
informative

Smart people are smart.


A is necessarily false — contradiction: A is inconsistent
with itself
?It is entirely made of copper and it is not made of metal.
A is not A.

4
Logic
 Classical logic is an attempt to find valid principles
of argument and inference.
a If something is human then it is mortal premise
b Socrates is human premise
c Socrates is mortal conclusion
 Can we go from a and b to c? Yes
 Truth is empirical: The premises need to

correspond with the facts of the world


 Sentences have truth values (true, false or

unknown)
 The state of the world that makes a sentence true

or false are its truth conditions


5
Logical Connectives
Þ and (p ∧ q)
Þ or (p ∨ q: disjunction, inclusive or)
Þ xor (p ⊕ q: exclusive or, either or)
Þ if (p → q: if then, material implication)
Þ iff (p ≡ q: if and only if) ((p → q) ∧ (q → p))
Þ not (¬p: contradiction)
An argument is a connected series of
statements attempting to establish a
proposition.

6
Methods of Argument
 Modus Ponens
a If something is human then it is mortal
b Socrates is human
c Socrates is mortal
p → q, p ⊢ q
 Modus tollens

a If something is human then it is mortal


b Zeus is not mortal
c Zeus is not human
p → q, ¬q ⊢¬p
7
Modus
ponens

a. All humans are mortal p → q if someone is human then they are


b. Socrates is human p
mortal
c. Therefore, Socrates is mortal q

p q p→ q
T T T
T F F
F T T

F F
T
Þ The way that affirms by affirming (Latin)
Þ p → q, p ⊢ q

Þ material implication (Not quite the same as


English if )
Modus tollens

a If something is human then it is mortal p→


q bZeus is not mortal ¬
c Zeus is not human q
¬
p
p q p→ q
T T T
T F F
T T
F
F F T
Þ The way that negates by negating (Latin)

Þ p → q, ¬q ⊢ ¬p

Yes it
is
Methods of Argument
 Hypothetical syllogism
a If something is human then it is mortal
b If something is mortal then it dies
c If something is human then it dies
p → q, q → r ⊢ p → r
 Disjunctive syllogism

(modus tollendo ponens: affirm by denying)


p Either a human is mortal or a human is immortal
q A human is not immortal
r A human is mortal
p⊕q,¬p ⊢ q

10
Empirical truths and
connectives

➣ Words themselves often carry more implications


I did A and B often implies I did A first

➣ There are many ways of saying the operations

11
Bad Arguments
Þ Formal
Affirming the consequent: p → q, q ⊢ p
professors talk too much, you talk too much ⊢ you are a
professor
Þ Informal
Equivocation: The sign said ”fine for parking here”, and since
it was fine, I parked there.
No True Scotsman: X doesn’t do Y; a is an X and does Y; a is
not a true X
Slippery Slope: We mustn’t allow text abbreviations or
students will not be able to write normal text.
False Dilemma: You are with us or against us
Guilt by Association: Hitler was a vegetarian ⊢ vegetarianism
is bad

12
Necessary Truth, A Priori Truth
and Analyticity
 ➣ Arguments from the speaker’s knowledge
➢ A priori truth is truth that is known without experience.
➢ A posteri truth is truth known from empirical testing.

 ➣ Arguments from the facts of the world


➢ Necessary truth is truth that cannot be denied without forcing a
contradiction.
➢ Contingent truth can be contradicted depending on the facts.

 ➣ Arguments from our model of the world


➢ Analytic truth Truth follows from meaning relations within the
sentence.
 can include word meaning
➢ Synthetic truth Agrees with facts of the world.

13
Þ Arguments from our model of the world
Analytic truth Truth follows from meaning relations within the
sentence.
need to know word meaning
Synthetic truth Agrees with facts of the world.
Þ Normally these give the same results, but not always. Why?

If we include our model of word meaning in our reasoning,


then an apple is a fruit is analytic. So it is important to have
an explicit model: these models are typically called
ontologies.

Þ What about the apple of my eye?

Building an inference engine is actually very, very hard, …


But very useful for question answering

14
Entailment
➣ Entailment
a. The evil overlord assassinated the man in the red shirt.
b. The man in the red shirt died.
A sentence p entails a sentence q when the truth of the first
(p) guarantees the truth of the second (q), and the falsity of the second
(q) guarantees the falsity of the first (p).

➣ Sources of Entailment
➢ Hyponyms
(7) I rescued a dog today. vs I rescued an animal today.
➢ Paraphrases

(8) My mom baked a cake.vs A cake was baked by my mom.

15
Paraphrases:Mutual entailment
Þ My mom baked a cake.
(11) A cake was baked by my
(12) mom.
p q
T → T
F → F

F ← F
T T

Þ This is synonymy

Þ What about contradiction?

16
Presuppositions
➣ Many statements assume the truth of something
else
(9) a. Kim’s spouse bakes the
best pies.
b. Kim has a spouse.
➣ Negating the presupposing sentence a doesn’t affect the
presupposition
b whereas negating an entailing sentence destroys the entailment.

➣ Sources of Presuppositions
➢Names presuppose that their referents exist
➢Clefts (it was X that Y ); Time adverbials; Comparatives
➢Factive verbs: realize; some judgement verbs: blame; …

➣ Presupposition is one aspect of a speaker’s strategy of


organizing in- formation for maximum clarity for the listener.
17
The Argument Clinic
Þ A sketch from episode 29 of Monty Python’s
Flying Circus

Þ An argument is a connected series of


statements intended to establish a
proposition

18

You might also like