WP3 UNEW Smart Grids and Grid-Connected Systems Chapter6 v0.1
WP3 UNEW Smart Grids and Grid-Connected Systems Chapter6 v0.1
prepared by Dr. Adib Allahham , Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK, January 2020
Smart Grid and Grid-Connected Systems
Part1: The Basic of Smart Grid and Grid-Connected
Systems
prepared by Dr. Adib Allahham , Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK, January 2020
Adib Allahham (2019): Smart Grid and Grid-Connected Systems. Teaching materials as part of the EU-funded project “Advanced
Teaching and training on Smart grid & Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Systems (AT-SGIRES)”, Newcastle University, Newcastle,
UK.
"The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the
authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein."
Outline
Sources of Uncertainty
Load and generation forecasting methods
Planning and operation under uncertainty
Case study
Sources of Uncertainty
In a power system, there are two types of uncertainty [1]:
1) Uncertainty related to modelling
The mathematical model is not a perfect representation of the
system
The values calculated by the model are different from the real values
According to the time horizon, the load forecasting can be divided into three
main categories:
Short-term forecast: The time horizon varies from one hour to one
week;
Medium-term forecast: The time horizon varies from one week to one
year;
Long-term forecast: The time horizon is higher than one year.
Load and generation forecasting
Load forecasting techniques are classified as:
Qualitative; and
Quantitative.
Qualitative methods do not use any mathematical models and they are
based on judgments, opinions, and personal experience.
Qualitative methods include the Delphi method and curve fitting.
The associate or causal models suppose that the load is driven by other
external variables and forecast the load based on the modelled
relationships between load and these variables [3].
Load and generation forecasting
Load and generation forecasting
1. Associate quantitative methods
These forecasting methods assume that the future has the same
characteristics and qualities as the past.
Load and generation forecasting
All these characteristics including trend, cycles, and seasonality might face
random variations that might have been caused by chance [5].
Load and generation forecasting
A. Naïve method
The naïve method assumes the forecast is the actual/real value of the last
period.
This method is simple to use with no computational cost.
It does not use any data analysis; hence its accuracy is low [5].
The naïve method can be expressed as follows:
𝐹 ( 𝑡 )= 𝐴 ( 𝑡 −1 )
Where:
is the forecasted value at the time period and
is the observed value at the time period .
Load and generation forecasting
B. Averaging methods
The moving average methods use the average of a number of the most
recent values of the observation/measurements.
Load and generation forecasting
This can be expressed in the following equation [5]:
𝑛
𝐹 ( 𝑡 )=∑ ¿ ¿ ¿
𝑖 =1
where:
is the forecasted value at the time period
the index corresponding to the period,
: the number of periods/data point during the considered
period, and
is the observed value at the time period .
In weighted moving average methods, more weights are assigned to the
recent data points. The weights must sum to one.
Load and generation forecasting
C. Exponential smoothing
The forecast value during the next time step will be calculated as follows
[5]:
𝐹 𝑡 =𝐹 𝑡 −1 +𝛼 ( 𝐴𝑡 −1 − 𝐹 𝑡 −1 )
Where:
is the forecasted value at the time step ;
is the actual load at the time step ;
is the load forecast at the time step ;
: is the smoothing coefficient where .
The amount of represents the error.
Load and generation forecasting
3. Techniques for trends
The techniques based on linear trends try to draw a straight line as close
as possible to the data points.
This can be done by drawing a straight line with minimizing the squared
values of vertical deviations between the line and the data points.
Load and generation forecasting
The straight line equation can be given as follows [5]:.
𝐹 ( 𝑡 )=𝑎+𝑏𝑡
𝑛 ∑ ( 𝑡𝑦 ) − ∑ 𝑡 ∑ 𝑦
𝑏=
𝑛 ∑ 𝑡 2−( ∑ 𝑡 )
2
𝑎=
∑ 𝑦 −𝑏 ∑ 𝑡
𝑛
Where:
Seasonal variations are cyclic occurrences that are not driven by the
underlying trend or recent historical observations;
New planning methods are required to enhance the integration of RESs into
the distribution network
Planning and operation under uncertainty
Key characteristics of the required planning methods:
Optimal allocation of RES leads to many benefits for the network such
as the deferral of reinforcement, reduction of network losses,
increasing system reliability, and minimizing curtailment of the RES [9].
The RES are placed in a way which satisfies the security constraints of
the network and meets the optimal planning of the networks [10].
Planning and operation under uncertainty
Combining planning and operation:
Combination of planning and operation of distribution networks
enables the simultaneous optimization of both.
Operational models can be integrated into the planning models to
avoid/defer network reinforcement.
Technical operational challenges in the distribution networks arising
from the integration of RESs/DERs [11]:
Voltage rise/drop
Hosting capacity for dynamic active load demand
Fault level
Reactive power support
Accommodation of RESs/DERs
Planning and operation under uncertainty
Considering uncertainty:
The uncertainty aspects affect the planning models and their impacts
increase when multiple aspects are combined.
The resulting model has higher accuracy and deteriorates less significant
as the prediction window increases.
Case study
The model is based on the same linear- and auto-regressive methods
The resulting model has higher accuracy and deteriorates less significant
as the prediction window increases.
Case study
The model combines an autoregressive element with generic
explanatory variables, such as
time of day
day of week, month, and
daylight
The autoregressive terms were selected by establishing which lagged
values had a correlation coefficient of 0.75 or higher – this value was
selected to ensure a compromise between accuracy and computational
efficiency.
Case study
The forecasting method is based on multiple linear regression (MLR).
An MLR model calculates the desired value based on a weighted sum of
explanatory variables:
𝑌 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 𝑋 1+ 𝛽 2 𝑋 2 +𝛽 3 𝑋 3 +…+ 𝛽𝑛 𝑋 𝑛 +𝑒
Where:
Y is the desired value,
represents the value of an explanatory variable,
is the weighting given to the term within the MLR model
e is an error term, representing the uncertainty in the model.
Case study
In short term demand forecasting, additional data are available, which
can be used to explain the variation in electricity demand.
The additional data available are the demand in the last few hours, and
weather variables which will be available to the demand forecast
through weather forecasts.
Case study
1.0
0.8
0.6
Correlation
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Lag (Hours)
While correlation does not imply causation, it is likely that the demand
over the last few hours, along with the demand at the same time on the
previous day, will be useful explanatory variables for demand prediction.
Case study
Ambient temperature
There is evidence within power system analysis that electricity demand
is influenced by the weather, and particularly by ambient temperature
[14].
Demand against temperature, on a month by month basis. January is represented by the bottom left
plot, followed by February-April along the bottom row, and December represented by the top right plot
Case study
The relationship between temperature and demand for each month of
the year shows that there is minimal correlation, even during the winter
months when, intuitively, low temperatures should correspond to high
demand.
The ambient temperature data was available on an hourly basis, but the
SNS forecasting requires data at a 30-minutes resolution.
Dummy variables
Dummy variables can be used to explain much of the variation. This is
because the variation is associated with concepts such as time of day,
day of week, month and whether there is daylight.
[1] Ivey, M., Akhil, A., Robinson, D., Stamber, K. and Stamp, J., 1999. Accommodating uncertainty in planning and
operations. Transmission Reliability Program, Office of Power Technologies, US Department of Energy.
[2] Li, R., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Jiang, J. and Zhang, W., 2017. A review of optimal planning active distribution
system: Models, methods, and future researches. Energies, 10(11), p.1715.
[3] Bunn, D.W. and Farmer, E.D., 1985. Review of short-term forecasting methods in the electric power industry.
Comparative models for electrical load forecasting, pp.13-30.
[4] Singh, A.K., Khatoon, S., Muazzam, M. and Chaturvedi, D.K., 2012, December. Load forecasting techniques
and methodologies: A review. In 2012 2nd International Conference on Power, Control and Embedded Systems
(pp. 1-10). IEEE.
[5] Stevenson, W.J., Hojati, M. and Cao, J., 2007. Operations management (Vol. 8). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
References
[6] Adhikari, N.C.D., Domakonda, N., Chandan, C., Gupta, G., Garg, R., Teja, S., Das, L. and Misra, A., 2019. An
Intelligent Approach to Demand Forecasting. In International Conference on Computer Networks and
Communication Technologies (pp. 167-183). Springer, Singapore
[7] Ghofrani, M. and Alolayan, M., 2017. Time Series and Renewable Energy Forecasting. In Time Series Analysis
and Applications. IntechOpen.
[8] Omu, A., Choudhary, R. and Boies, A., 2013. Distributed energy resource system optimisation using mixed
integer linear programming. Energy Policy, 61, pp.249-266.
[9] Aghaei, J., Muttaqi, K.M., Azizivahed, A. and Gitizadeh, M., 2014. Distribution expansion planning considering
reliability and security of energy using modified PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) algorithm. Energy, 65,
pp.398-411.
[10] Abapour, S., Zare, K. and Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., 2015. Dynamic planning of distributed generation units in
active distribution network. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 9(12), pp.1455-1463.
References
[11] Li, R., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Jiang, J. and Zhang, W., 2017. A review of optimal planning active distribution
system: Models, methods, and future researches. Energies, 10(11), p.1715.
[12] Greenwood, D., Long Term Electricity Demand Forecast for Energy Storage Scheduling – Smarter Network
Storage. 2014, Newcastle University.
[13] Hong, T., Gui, M., Baran, M.E. and Willis, H.L., 2010, July. Modeling and forecasting hourly electric load by
multiple linear regression with interactions. In IEEE PES General Meeting (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[14] Greenwood, D., Short-Term Electricity Demand Forecasting – Smarter Network Storage. 2014, Newcastle
University
Thank you very much
for your attention!
Contribution by Newcastle University to the EU-funded project “Advanced Teaching and training on Smart
grid & Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Systems (AT-SGIRES)”
prepared by Dr. Adib Allahham , Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK, January 2020
Adib Allahham (2019): Smart Grid and Grid-Connected Systems. Teaching materials as part of the EU-funded project “Advanced
Teaching and training on Smart grid & Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Systems (AT-SGIRES)”, Newcastle University, Newcastle,
UK
"The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the
authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein."
57
AT-SGIRES
Contact Information, Website and Social
Media Sites
http://meu.edu.jo/sites/atsgires [email protected]
[email protected] facebook.com/ATSGIRES
[email protected] [email protected]
/company/atsgires