Executive

Summary

V
336.2

+5
9
Fluctuation report
Period Selection Current Annual Fluctuation rate YTD number of
Month leavers
Month
1.5 0 /o
2017-12-01 419
58 2,251 31 + 27
Current Headcou Its Current Number O
current
Ÿ 0.88% leavers
workforce
2 31 over previous V27.91% changes
22 ”news vs. leavers
!new_comer !leaver

Where, who and why left?

Location

W”g
//select a Location/Department on the bar chart

-•i=•
ontiarene When did they
HC: 711
Boston leave?
<1 1-2 yrs 2-3 yrs 3-5 yrs 5
Target: 680
left? 37%
85 177 2 48
60

HC: 26
Chicago
Target: 50

Houston
Target:72 63%
0 Generation Y/Millennium

New York
HC: 252
Target: 200
-••5 Why did they
leave? Salary
Family reason
HC:427
Newport
Target: 400
No career opportunity

a •-
During probationIssues
Performance time
HC: 235
Washington
Target:25 Other
Travelling
0
Mutual agreement
jan. Mar. May. jul. Sep. 0 20 40 60 100 120
@IvettAlexa
80
Number of reasons
OB o Overall
Oe By Race t
A8SmMucke(U.S)
o RAil
O By
Gender
Ocory
O
o Manufacuñy IntersecMonaT Representation as of 8/2120
(Gender.
Race)

Blac
k

Mukiracial
White 53
American Indian or @askan 5%
Native Hawaiian or Other
P

0¥ 20B 40A 80A 80A

S. Partners Only
TotnIs may not add up to 100 percent due to
rounding Workf+ace ampos lion metrics are derived
from EEO•
Intracompany
movements Hover over the lines to
see the percentage of
Newp movements
I
Denver
New York

Chicag
o Washingto
n

Bosto
n

Atlant Houston
a
Pick a semester
Fal I ? 11?

Undergraduat Grad & Prof Acad. Professionals &

e Students Professorial Post Docs Staff
Students

Women Men

Undergraduate Grad & Prof Acad. Professionals

Students Students Professorial and Post Docs Staff

l00B 10096 10.. 100B

9.7 8.696 B.996
6
23.3B B
B096 g 8096 8096 80%

30.596
6096 60% 60% 60%

73.794 84.296
409t 40% 40B
ZS.896

2Wo ’’ 2096 20 2006

In tel na - .anaI (any meet

Other M inority (ñ.S.) Other, Unknown (U.S.}
Princeton University Student Diversity
Dashboard
Select Degree Degree Show labels?
demographic: Level: All Track: No
Federal AII
Race/Ethnicity

Federal Race/Ethnicity @ Gheck to /j/de

All degree seeking students by Academic /oo/notes
Year (AII)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 2017 201 2019 202

2014
Source. Office of Registrar Opening Enrollment Arc/rva/ /2eports /2eports 20/ 0-2020 2016 8 0
D’ndup//cated headcount of Pñnceton's ft//-lime undergraduate, masters, and docfora/ degree candidates as
of /'/ovem6er T, 2020 Generated 6y the Office of /nsfitutiona/ Research, Princeton University
"To protect sma// ce// sizes. ”/'/afive Hawaiian/Pacific is/andeX and ’A/at/ve Pmeñcan" are 6orfi included in rms
co/umn
"'Unknown"is re-slaled as "Individualswho have nof sel f-idenfified".
In this view. Degree Level Degree Track (P///

Whit Hispanic ”Individuals who have not self-

identified
e Internation
Asia al
n @ ”2 or more
Blac races

k
 SfudenIs by
School

MIT All Student Diversity by

School
2005 to 2021 Trend - Select an MiT MIT Sch ooi Comparison - Select an Academ ie
School: (All) Year: 2021 Q

SAP snAs Sloan SoS

s

13
%
7
%

30°
A
 Underrepresente
d
Organization:
^!
Staf
% of Full-Time Faculty by Race f % of Staff by Race
Most recent Fall Most recent Fal I

68.9% 53.9%
White WNte

% % % %
Underreoresenled Underreoresenled Underreoresenled Underreoresenled
Historical Trend Most recent Fal I Historical Trend Most recent Fal I

45.0%

"a 11 2016 "a 11 2017 "a II201o° "a 11 "a 11 2016 "a 11 2017 "a II201o° "a 11
2019 2019

Undergraduates Graduate
% of U nder9rad uates by
Race Most recent FalI
s % of Graduates by Race
Most recent Fal I

55.3% 62.9%
White White

% % % %
Underreoresenled Underreoresenled Underreoresenled Underreoresenled
Historical Trend Most recent Fal I Historical Trend Most recent Fal I

34.1
%

"a 11 2016 "a 11 2017 "a II201o° "a 11 "a 11 "a 11 "a II201o° "a 11
2019 2016 2017 2019
 Student Enrollment by Gender, Student Level and Ethnicity, Spring 2020
Term
Soring 2020
Unduplicated Student

Campus(AIICampuse
s)

Campus (Graduate in STORP)

Headco..

363
275

288
5
2

4
Gender
"emale
0
Male
Sophomore

9. Un CI
6. Un CI
Senior

Law

PharmD
10.
Other First

7. 1st
Grad
5.

UG

GR

11.
OIRE Standard School College
3.
Year

OIRE Standard Department

15747 Academic Career

Unduplicated

10K
Studen..

3066 2130 3697 3805

751 Student Level/Stand inp
American Asian Black/ Hispanic/ Internation Native Two or White
Unknown
Indian/ African Latino al Hawaiian/ more races Gender
Alaska .. American Other Pa..
Ethnicity with International
American Indian/AIaska Native Hisoanic/Lati no Two or more races
Full Part
As ian International Unknow n
BIack/A+rica n Ameriean Nati ve Hawai ian/Other Paelf ie Is Ian.. White
HR DIVERSITY SCORECARD

2,42
2

ûFMDFR

b
0

4 4 4

44m 4.3 4.3

, ,

3 3 3
 •› - .
•

Ô DECISIVE DATA '

“
 );)) PayScale
Industries With The Largest Gender Pay Gaps
How do you want to compare median salaries?
Controlled: Similar men and women in similar
jobs Uncontrolled: AII men and women

H o v e r o v e r th e p o i n t s t o view m e d i an sal ary a n d g e n d e r p a y g a p info FeiTlale Male

rmation.
Finance and
Insurance Professional. Scientific, and
Technical Services Mining. Quarrying. and
Oil and Gas Extraction
Public
Administration
Informatio
n Tech
Industry
Managem
ent of
Companies
and
Enterprises
Utilitie
s Health Care and Social
Assistance
Manufacturi
ng Transportation and
Warehousing
Constructio
n Retail
Trade
Agriculture. $0 ST0 S20 $30 $^0 $50 560 S70 SGO
Forestry, K K K K K K K K K
Fishing
Job industries are ordered by gender pay gap size.
andNote how the order changes depending on whether we control for compensable factors or
not. Hunting
Educational
Services
Wholesale
Trade
Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing Other Services (except Public
Administration) Accommodation and
Food Services
Arts, Entertainment, and
Recreation Administrative and Support and
Waste Management
JOB APPLICATION PROCESS
Othe Indee Company Linked
r d Site IN
The most applications
were made through
Link..

Less than half of No Rep Rejectio Readie

the companies Iy n d
responded

Interview Reo Iies too

section Iate

Rejection o Ta s Task Reo

Requested uested

Companies requested
tasks in a higher
percent..

6.2
%
The Universe of Jobs: 90,000 jobs posted between Jun-Sep *° ’’*
2020 %*’ “
T h e cI ose r a y two points ( obs) ure, I h e mo re I ike Iy bot h ] obs cont pete fo r I Eng ineeri ng jobs overlap This resul ts in
h e sa me tu lent
greater compet irion for the same talent
 Attrition Stats 16
Human Resource Male 150 Attritions within 1st year

Attrit0
Female of]oInIng

A a sis

*" 2 3 7 MonthlyAttritionTmnd
22 25 19 18 1B 18
20
Total Attrition
Attrition in human resources I I i i I I

,470
refers to the gradual loss of Jun- Aug-18 Oct-18 Dec-18 reb-19 Apr-
employees overtime. 18 19
In general, relatively high
attrition is problematic
for companies.
Understand patterns in
attrition data so you can Does Age really 49°/› • -
To tal E m p l oye e s find the areas of Attrition is with
improvement to reduce matter in age 26-35 10S796
d6•SS
the attrition. axrition?

D e p a l m e nt wise analysis of att rition

D o e s W o r k - L i f e b a l a n c e i m p a c t o n att r i ti o Understand the patterns in attrition based on Department, Job Role and Education of

Only 10.596 employees left t h e organizati on beause of bad eSOU

’
Ce
*
wor k-life balance
Technical Life Human
Department Oth r Martebna Grand Total
Human
lb I Resources
Resources

mi a
11A96 Research s‹ Healthcare Repre..
Development Laboratory
Technician
Manager

m
Manufacturing

Research Director

Research scientist 47
Better Sales Manager

Grand Total 32

Does travelling impact on attrition? What are the other parameters impacting on
Is daily commute or business travel a reason for attrition?
attrition?
Is there any pattern in attrition with Monthly Income?
Daily Commute Distance 8 Attrition Business Travel & or working with same managers for a longer time is causing
Attrition attrition?
1-7Km 44.30% Duration with current managers vs attrition Impact of lntome on Attrition

&15Km 27.0096 Mon-Travel 12 0•3 Yrs 165

21-25Km 13.50% TraveI_Frequently 69 4-7 Yrs 50 3-6k
16- 9.709¢ &10 Yrs 19 6-10k
20Km TraveI_RareIy 1s6
5.4996 11-15 YrS 8 3
26•30K
m

Dashboard designed
by
 Employee Turnover Dashboard 3g--
- ›Ioy°° t ov - s th yes -" 'er t- E Jz - “ *r- er oy*es wh •av - - n orgy- aE zrir spec “ ed ir

Lovel
ye
-' is c ar Ilus ates z * n yb - *n y-°.s wt •ft tf Arr-ni"”tio - “ rinc Ie ”Ovi-'is ^ *. r inE

359 18% 2.2

G*O Employee Turnover Turnover Rate Avg. Years Tenure

Turnover Details
When Who Why

Turnovers per Quarter Turnover 96 per Department Turnover Type - Voluntary or Involuntary
In whaE quarter did employees leaved Which departments have the highest turnover Did an employee leave voluntarily or involuntar ilv?
ed
10B 2S.9'
102 W

22.1W

20.996

18.9'W

Hu riari
18.S
W Voluntary
285 (79%)
184W

01 02 03 OJ

Turnover Buckets Turnover 96 per Position Turnover Reason

2150a
33

20.Z96
17

19.9'
W

k''icc P•cs 19.B

78 idcrit W

1L6'

17.196

82