Economics3e Ch02
Economics3e Ch02
Economics 3e
Chapter 2 CHOICE IN A WORLD OF SCARCITY
PowerPoint Image Slideshow
Ch.2 OUTLINE
(Credit: modification of "College of DuPage Commencement 2018 107" by COD Newsroom/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)
In general, the higher the degree, the higher the salary. So why aren’t more people pursuing
higher degrees? The short answer: choices and tradeoffs.
2.1 How Individuals Make Choices Based on Their Budget Constraint
• Each point on the budget constraint represents a combination of burgers and bus tickets
whose total cost adds up to Alphonso’s budget of $10.
• The slope of the budget constraint is determined by the relative price of burgers and bus
tickets.
• Giving up one burger means gaining four bus tickets.
• The opportunity set - every point on (or inside) the constraint which shows a combination
of burgers and bus tickets that Alphonso can afford.
• Any point outside the constraint is not affordable, because it would cost more money than
Alphonso has in his budget.
The Concept of Opportunity Cost
• Opportunity cost indicates what people must give up to obtain what they
desire.
• The cost of one item is the lost opportunity to do or consume something else.
• The opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative.
• A fundamental principle of economics is that every choice has an opportunity cost.
• For Alphonso, the opportunity cost of a burger is the four bus tickets he
would have to give up.
Identifying Opportunity Cost
• In many cases, it is reasonable to refer to the opportunity cost as the
price.
• Example: If your cousin buys a new bicycle for $300, then $300 measures the
amount of “other consumption” that he has forsaken.
• For people and firms alike, dealing with sunk costs can be frustrating.
• Example - A firm finds it hard to give up on a new product that is doing poorly
because much money was spent in creating and launching the product.
• The lesson of sunk costs is to ignore the past errors and make
decisions based on what will happen in the future.
2.2 The Production Possibilities Frontier and Social Choices
• The law of diminishing marginal utility is a more specific case of the law of
diminishing returns.
Healthcare vs. Education Production Possibilities Frontier, Continued
• The curvature of the PPF shows that as we add more resources to education,
moving from left to right along the horizontal axis, the original gains are fairly
large, but gradually diminish.
• By contrast, as we add more resources to healthcare, moving from bottom to top
on the vertical axis, the original gains are fairly large, but again gradually diminish.
Differences - Budget Constraint and PPF
Two major differences between a budget constraint and a PPF:
• Both the budget constraint and the social production possibilities frontier
(PPF) show the constraints under which individual consumers and society as
a whole operate.
• Both diagrams show the tradeoff in choosing more of one good at the cost of
less of the other.
Productive Efficiency and Allocative Efficiency
• Productive efficiency - when it is impossible to produce more of one
good (or service) without decreasing the quantity produced of
another good (or service)
• Productive efficiency -
• All choices along a given PPF like B, C, and D display productive efficiency.
• R does not, because it is inside the PPF curve, and thus not all resources are
being used.
The PPF and Comparative Advantage
• How much of a good a country decides to produce depends on how
expensive it is to produce it versus buying it from a different country.
• The U.S. PPF is flatter than the Brazil PPF implying that the opportunity cost of
wheat in terms of sugar cane is lower in the U.S. than in Brazil.
• Conversely, the opportunity cost of sugar cane is lower in Brazil.
• The U.S. has comparative advantage in wheat and Brazil has comparative
advantage in sugar cane.
2.3 Confronting Objections to the Economic Approach
1) People, firms, and society do not act in a way that fits the economic
way of thinking.
• Consumers will encourage businesses to offer goods and services that meet their
needs.
• It is possible that broader social good can emerge from selfish individual actions.
• Self-interest in economics does not not imply self-interest in all aspects of life.