Scribd
Upload
6 views

10.-Code-Optimization

Uploaded by

most.maharin.khan.mithi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

10.-Code-Optimization

Uploaded by

most.maharin.khan.mithi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Code Optimization

Shifa Tasmiah Tisha

Slide courtesy: Prof. Dr. M. Moshiul Hoque


Code Optimization
• High-level language constructs can introduce
substantial run-time overhead if we naively
translate each construct independently into
machine code.
• Elimination of unnecessary instructions in object
code, or the replacement of one sequence of
instructions by a faster sequence of instructions
that does the same thing is usually called "code
improvement" or "code optimization."
Quicksort
Integers = 04 bytes
B1
B5
B2

B3
B6
B4
Flow Graph
Optimization Techniques: Semantic
Preserving Transformations

• Common-sub expression elimination


• Copy Propagation
• Dead-code elimination
• Constant folding
Before
Local Common Sub-
expression Elimination

• A program will include several


calculations of the same value, such as
an offset in an array.
• Some of these duplicate calculations
cannot be avoided by the programmer After
because they lie below the level of
detail accessible within the source
language.
 B5 recalculates 4*i & 4*j, although
none of these calculations were
requested explicitly by the
programmer.
GLOBAL Common Sub-
expression Elimination
An occurrence of an expression E is
called a common sub-expression if E
was previously computed & the
values of the variables in E have not
changed since the previous
computation
We avoid recomputing E if we can
use its previously computed value;
variable x to which the previous
computation of E was assigned has
not changed in the interim.
Example 9.2: Fig. shows the result
of eliminating both global and local
common sub expressions from
blocks B5 and B6 in the flow graph.
After local common sub expressions are
eliminated, B5 still evaluates 4*i & 4*j.
Both are common subexpressions; in
particular, the three statements
B5

B3

using t4 computed in block B3 .


Observe that as control passes from the evaluation of 4*j in B3
to B5, there is no change to j & no change to t4, so t4 can be used
if 4*j is needed.
Another common sub expression
The statements
comes to light in B5 after t4 replaces
t8
The new expression a[t4]
corresponds to the value of a[ j] at
the source level.
Not only does j retain its value as
control leaves B3 & then enters B5 ,
but a[j] , a value computed into a
temporary t5, does too, because
there are no assignments to B5
elements of the array a in the
interim.
B3
B5
B2
Copy Propagation

• Block B5 can be further improved by


eliminating x using two new transformations.
• One concerns assignments of the form u = v
called copy statements.
(a) (b)
The idea behind the copy-
propagation transformation is
to use v for u, wherever
possible after the copy
statement u=v. B5
assignment
x = t3 in block B5 is a copy.
Dead Code Elimination
• A variable is live at a point in a program if its
value can be used subsequently; otherwise, it
is dead at that point.
• A related idea is dead (or useless) code
statements that compute values that never
get used.
• While the programmer is unlikely to introduce
any dead code intentionally, it may appear as
the result of previous transformations.
• One advantage of copy propagation is that it
often turns copy statement into dead code.
Copy propagation followed by dead-code
elimination removes the assignment to x and
transforms the code
Problems
• Page 51: 2.2.1, 2.2.2
• Page 125: 3.3.2,
• Page 151: 3.6.3
• Page 166: 3.7.3
• Page 206: 4.2.1, 4.2.2
• Page 216: 4.3.1
• Page 370: 6.2.1
• Page 440: 7.2.3
• Page 516: 8.2.1, 8.2.2, 8.2.6
• Page 531: 8.4.1

You might also like