Scribd
Upload
1K views15 pages

SPMS Rating Scale

Uploaded by

mpdo santa maria bulacan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views15 pages

SPMS Rating Scale

Uploaded by

mpdo santa maria bulacan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

SPMS

RATING SCALE
DPCR FORM
DPCR AND IPCR
ACTUAL
ACCOMPLISH-
RATING REMARKS
MENTS (Targets + Measures)

Q E T A

1.

Quality Average
2.

3.
Efficiency/ Timeliness
Quantity
General Rating Scale (Quality)
Numerical Rating Adjectival Description
5 Outstanding No error, mistakes, corrections

4 Very Satisfactory 1-2 error, mistakes, corrections

3 Satisfactory 3-4 error, mistakes, corrections

2 Unsatisfactory 5-6 error, mistakes, corrections

1 Poor 7 or more error, mistakes,


corrections
General Rating Scale (Quality )
Quality = Target vs. Accomplishment

Ex. = (T)0 error vs.(A)2 errors


COMMON MEASUREMENT
= 4 Very Satisfactory
LAPSES

ERROR

CORRECTION

REVISION
(Quantity/Efficiency)
Numerical Rating Adjectival Rating Description
5 Outstanding 130% and above meeting the
success indicators

4 Very Satisfactory 100.01% to 129.99% of the


success indicators
3 Satisfactory 90% to 100% of the success
indicators
2 Unsatisfactory 70% to 89.99% of the success
indicators
1 Poor Below 70% of the success
indicators
(Quantity/Efficiency)

Quantity /Efficiency = Accomplishment


Target

Ex. 24 endorsements (A) x 100 %


22 endorsements (T)

= 109 %
= 4 or Very Satisfactory
(Quantity/Efficiency)
Quantity /Efficiency = Accomplishment
Target

Ex. 42 committee hearings (A) x 100 %


15 committee hearings (T)

= 280 %
= 5 or Outstanding
(Quantity/Efficiency)
FIX target & Accomplishment

Quantity /Efficiency = Accomplishment


Target

Ex. 1 ANNUAL INVESTMENT PLAN (A) x 100 %


1 ANNUAL INVESTMENT PLAN (T)

= 100 %
= 5 or Outstanding
(Quantity/Efficiency)
FIX target & Accomplishment

Quantity /Efficiency = Accomplishment


Target

Ex 1 Local Development Council Gen.Assembly/Meeting Conducted (A) x 100 %


1 Local Development Council Ge.Assembly/Meeting Conducted ( T)

= 100 %
= 5 or Outstanding
General Rating Scale (Timeliness)
Numerical Rating Adjectival Description
5 Outstanding 130% and above of the planned
targets
4 Very Satisfactory 115% to 129% of the planned
targets
3 Satisfactory Performance met 90% to 114% of
the planned targets.

2 Unsatisfactory Performance only met 51% to 89%


of the planned targets

1 Poor Performance failed to deliver most


of the targets by 50% and below
General Rating Scale (Timeliness)
Timeliness = Target- Accomp x 100 %
Target

Ex. 50 days (T) – 45 days (A) x 100 % (accomplished ahead by 5 days)


50 days (T)

= 10 % plus 100%

Exceeded expectation by
110 % of the planned target

= 3 or Satisfactory
General Rating Scale (Timeliness)
If timeliness failed to reach the target

Timeliness = Target- Accomp x 100 %


Target

Ex. 10 days (T) – 15 days (A) x 100 % (late by 5 days)


10 days (T)

= -50 % plus 100%

failed expectation by
50 % of the planned target

= 1 or Poor
General Rating Scale (Timeliness)
If timeliness exceeded the target

Timeliness = Target- Accomp x 100 %


Target

Ex. 20 days (T) – 10 days (A) x 100 % (accomplished ahead by 10 days)


20 days (T)
COMMON
= 50 % plus 100% MEASUREMENT
IN MINUTES/HOURS
Exceeded expectations by
150 % of the planned target IN DAYS/MONTHS

= 5 or Outstanding ON SPECIFIC DATE

BEFORE DEADLINE
FINAL RATING
FINAL NUMERICAL ADJECTIVAL RATING
RATING
5.00 Outstanding (O)

4.00-4.99 Very Satisfactory (VS)

3.00-3.99 Satisfactory (S)

2.00-2.99 Unsatisfactory (US)

1.00-1.99 Poor (P)

*Revised as per EO No. 2017-02-27-009

You might also like