0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views25 pages

Chapter 5 Decision Making-Updated

Uploaded by

Kedir Abrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views25 pages

Chapter 5 Decision Making-Updated

Uploaded by

Kedir Abrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

CHAPTER: FIVE

DECISION
MAKING
DECISION-MAKING
 Decision
◦ Making a choice from two or more
alternatives

 The Decision-Making Process


◦ Identifying a problem and decision criteria
and allocating weights to the criteria
◦ Developing, analyzing, and selecting an
alternative that can resolve the problem
◦ Implementing the selected alternative
◦ Evaluating the decision’s effectiveness

2
STEP 1: IDENTIFICATION
OF A PROBLEM

 Problem
◦ A discrepancy between an existing and desired
state of affairs
 Characteristics of Problems
◦ A problem becomes a problem when a manager
becomes aware of it
◦ There is pressure to solve the problem
◦ The manager must have the authority, information,
or resources needed to solve the problem

4
STEP 2: IDENTIFICATION OF DECISION CRITERIA

 Decision criteria are factors that are


important (relevant) to resolving the problem:
 Costs that will be incurred (investments required)
 Risks likely to be encountered (chance of failure)
 Outcomes that are desired (growth of the firm)

STEP 3: ALLOCATION OF WEIGHTS TO CRITERIA

• Decision criteria are not of equal importance:


– Assigning a weight to each item places the items in the
correct priority order of their importance in the decision-
making process
5
STEP 4: DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES

 Identifying viable alternatives


 Alternativesare listed (without evaluation) that
can resolve the problem

STEP 5: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

 Appraising each alternative’s strengths and


weaknesses
– An alternative’s appraisal is based on its ability to resolve the
issues identified in steps 2 and 3.

6
STEP 6: SELECTION OF AN ALTERNATIVE

Choosing the best alternative


The alternative with the highest total weight is
chosen
STEP 7: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALTERNATIVE

Putting the chosen alternative into action


– Conveying the decision to and gaining commitment from
those who will carry out the decision

7
STEP 8: EVALUATION OF DECISION EFFECTIVENESS

 The soundness of the decision is judged by


its outcomes:
 How effectively was the problem resolved by
outcomes resulting from the chosen
alternatives?
 If
the problem was not resolved, what went
wrong?

8
DECISIONS MANAGERS
MOSTLY MAKE…
MAKING DECISIONS
 Rationality
 Managers make consistent, value-
maximizing choices with specified
constraints.
 Assumptions are that decision makers:
 Are perfectly rational, fully objective, and logical.
 Have carefully defined the problem and identified
all viable alternatives i.e. no ambiguity
 Have a clear and specific goal
 Will select the alternative that maximizes
outcomes in the organization’s interests rather
than in their personal interests.
MAKING DECISIONS
(CONT’D)
 Bounded Rationality
 Managers make decisions rationally, but are limited
(bounded) by their ability to process information.
 Assumptions are that decision makers:
 Does not have knowledge about all alternatives so will
not analyze all alternatives
 Will satisfice*—choose the first alternative
encountered that satisfactorily solves the problem—
rather than maximizing the outcome of their decision
by considering all alternatives and choosing the best.
 Escalation of Commitment
 Increasing or continuing a
commitment to previous decision
despite mounting evidence that the decision may
have been wrong.
INFLUENCES ON DECISION
MAKING

 Role of Intuition
 Intuitive decision making
 Making decisions on the basis of experience,
feelings, and accumulated judgment
 One-third of managers and other employees said
they emphasized “gut feeling” over cognitive
problem solving

6–12
TYPES OF PROBLEMS AND
DECISIONS
 Structured Problems
 Involve goals that clear.
 Are familiar (have occurred before).
 Areeasily and completely defined—
information about the problem is available
and complete.
 Programmed Decision
A repetitive decision that can be handled by
a routine approach.
TYPES OF PROGRAMMED
DECISIONS
 A Procedure
 A series of interrelated steps that a manager can
use to respond (applying a policy) to a structured
problem.

 A Rule
 An explicit statement that limits what a manager
or employee can or cannot do in carrying out the
steps involved in a procedure.

 A Policy
 A general guideline for making a decision about a
structured problem.
AN EXAMPLE OF POLICY, PROCEDURE, AND RULE

 Policy
 Accept all customer-returned merchandise.
 Procedure
 Followall steps for completing merchandise
return documentation.
 Rules
 Managers must approve all refunds over
$50.00.
 No credit purchases are refunded for cash.
PROBLEMS AND
DECISIONS (CONT’D)
 Unstructured Problems
 Problems that are new or unusual and for
which information is ambiguous or
incomplete.
 Problems that will require custom-made
solutions.
 Nonprogrammed Decisions
 Decisions that are unique and nonrecurring.
 Decisions that generate unique responses.
EXHIBIT 6-7 PROGRAMMED VERSUS
NONPROGRAMMED DECISIONS
DECISION-MAKING
CONDITIONS
 Certainty
A ideal situation in which a manager can
make an accurate decision because the
outcome of every alternative choice is
known.

 Risk
A situation in which the manager is able to
estimate the likelihood (probability) of
outcomes that result from the choice of
particular alternatives.
DECISION-MAKING
CONDITIONS

 Uncertainty
 Limitedinformation prevents estimation of
outcome probabilities for alternatives
associated with the problem and may force
managers to rely on intuition, hunches, and
“gut feelings”.
COMMON DECISION-MAKING ERRORS
AND BIASES

6–20
DECISION-MAKING BIASES
AND ERRORS
 Heuristics
 Using
“rules of thumb” to simplify decision
making.
 Overconfidence Bias
 Holdingunrealistically positive views of
one’s self and one’s performance.
 Immediate Gratification Bias
 Choosingalternatives that offer immediate
rewards and that to avoid immediate costs.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND
ERRORS (CONT’D)
 Anchoring Effect
 Focusing and accepting initial information and
ignoring subsequent information.
 Selective Perception
 Selectively
organizing and interpreting events based
on the decision maker’s biased perceptions.
 Confirmation Bias
 Seekingout information that reaffirms past choices
and discounting contradictory information.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND
ERRORS (CONT’D)
 Framing Bias
 Selecting and highlighting certain aspects of a
situation while ignoring other aspects.
 Availability Bias
 Losing decision-making objectivity by focusing
on the most recent events.
 Representation Bias
 Drawing analogies and seeing identical
situations when none exist.
 Randomness Bias
 Creating unfounded meaning out of random
events.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES AND
ERRORS (CONT’D)
 Sunk Costs Errors
 Forgetting that current actions cannot influence past
events rather relate only to future consequences.
 Self-Serving Bias
 Taking quick credit for successes and blaming
outside factors
for failures.
 Hindsight Bias
 Mistakenly believing that an event could have been
predicted once the actual outcome is known (after-
the-fact).
THE END

THANK YOU SO
MUCH!!

You might also like