Year 5 TOK Lesson 4

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

TOK Lesson 4

Knowledge Framework
● tool for analysis and comparison between
different AOKs
● Think across AOKs
Bias &
perspectives
What does it mean to be ‘biased’
about something?

How might being biased prevent us


from achieving the aims of providing
multiple perspectives?
20 key biases
1. Anchoring
1 bias 2. 2Availability 3.3Bandwagon effect 4.
4 Blinds-spot bias
heuristic
5. Choice support 6. Clustering illusion 7. Confirmation bias 8. Conservatism bias
bias
9. Information bias 10. Ostrich effect 11. Outcome bias 12. Overconfidence

13. Placebo effect 14. Pro- innovation 15. Recency 16. Salience
bias
Pair up and 18.
17. Selective research on the biases.19.
Stereotyping Choose 2 that stand
Survivorship biasout20.
to Zero-risk bias
perception you and explain how they can be exploited to create ‘new’
knowledge
Be an outsider?

What does Julia Galef


mean by “looking at a
problem as an outsider”?

How can this help us


overcome unconscious
biases?
Identity and Power (What helps to define someone)

● Rituals
○ where and what habits and cultural practices people partake
in
● Relationships
○ meaningful bonds that one creates with others
● Restrictions
○ what is stopping a person from fully viewing a particular
knowledge (for example, your identity is not merely your
nationality
Scope
● The extent and limit of the AOKs and
how it fits in with the whole total of
knowledge
● also looks at the scope of problems
and solutions that an area of
knowledge addresses
● Context where knowing how to solve
a problem may be more important
than knowing about the problem itself

● What is the limit of our knowledge?


● How do we distinguish the extent of our
knowledge?
Defining ‘The ability of a healthy mind to think and

reason
make judgments, especially based on practical
facts and valid evidence’
(from the Cambridge English dictionary)

● Based on this definition, which areas of


knowledge do you think most rely on our
ability to ‘reason’?
Types of reasoning:
syllogisms
Points to consider:

A syllogism is a type of deduction, and when


followed correctly, produces a certain conclusion:

● Premise 1: All humans are mortal


● Premise 2: Socrates is a human
● Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal

But, if one of the premises is not certain, it leads to


a flawed conclusion:

● Premise 1: The IB Diploma requires you to


work hard
● Premise 2: Juan is an IB Diploma student
● Conclusion: Juan works hard
Flawed reasoning: logical
fallacies
A logical fallacy is a failure in reasoning that leads to an argument being
invalid. They are like cracks in the foundation of a building: if they are
present, the building is going to fall down. So detecting fallacies is a very
important part of making yourself critically skilled: if you know what
fallacies are, you can both avoid making them yourself when you present
an argument, and spot them when others are using them.

A formal fallacy:

Some IB students study History

John is an IB student

Therefore, John is studying History

This is a fallacy because although we can say that it is possible that John is
studying History, we cannot say that with certainty, because only some IB
students study History. Therefore, there is a problem with the logic of the
structure.

An informal fallacy:

TOK teaches people how to argue

People argue all the time


Emotion Reason
A strong feeling such as love or The ability of a healthy mind to think
anger, or strong feelings in general and make judgments, especially
based on practical facts
● Like a lot of men, he finds it hard to
express his emotions ● We humans believe that we are the
● My mother was overcome with only animals to have the power of
emotion and burst into tears reason
● The British traditionally tend not to
● He lost his reason when both his
display much emotion in public parent were killed in the crash
● An as actor he could communicate a
● And did reason prevail over
whole range of emotions emotion?
● He argued that morality could be
conceptualized as a series of
LOOKING AT THE RELATIONSHIP VIA LANGUAGE Do these
principles definitions
based on humansuggest
reason
an antagonistic or a complementary relationship? Focus on the words in blue to help
you answer this question.
Moral/ Ethical influences
How did you develop the ability to ‘morally navigate’ the
world?

Video
ethics
Defining (ˈɛθɪks)
n
ethics 1. (Philosophy) (functioning as singular) the philosophical
study of the moral value of human conduct and of the rules
and principles that ought to govern it; moral philosophy. See
Read the dictionary
also meta-ethics
definition of ‘ethics’.
2. (functioning as plural) a social, religious, or civil code of
Where does the behaviour considered correct, esp that of a particular group,
profession, or individual
definition seem to
place the 3. (functioning as plural) the moral fitness of a decision,
course of action, etc: he doubted the ethics of their verdict.
responsibility for
ethics - on individuals, ˈethicist, eˈthician n

or groups of knowers?
‘Empathy’
What does it mean
when we say ‘using
empathy’ to
understand something?

Give an explanation,
supported by examples
of how empathy might
give us an insight into
other people’s
experiences

How important is it to
use our empathy when
making decisions
Responsibility

Are there certain


‘moral rules’ that
everyone has a
responsibility
to follow? Can
you give any
examples?

What problems
might we
encounter in
trying to impose
Freedom of
belief?
To what extent do you think we
should be allowed to believe what we
want?

Should there be any limits to this?


(Moral) Watch the short video. Draw up a list
of pros and cons of being a relativist.
relativism Include the following terms and
examples in your answer.

● Culture
● Absolute truth
● Moral rules & social customs
● Right
● Ethnocentric - imposing your own
set of rules on other cultures
● Examples - bullfighting, customs in
ancient Rome, Nazi Germany
● Video here.

You might also like