0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views5 pages

Michelin Case PPT v10

Uploaded by

gialam523
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views5 pages

Michelin Case PPT v10

Uploaded by

gialam523
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Ques tioCn

a1- eQue s tio n 1: W h a t m i s t a ke s d i d C h a l o n m a ke a s h e t o o k


over this larg e N o rtBhaAc kmgerrica n division
q Proble
QueCs At ioSnE2: W h a t diff erences in A m eri c a n v a l ue s y s t e m s a n d French v a l ue
of the diffi culties C ha l o n i s f a c i n g a s h e i m p l e m e n t s a ? (B)
new BA s tCr aKteGgR y OU
Lot of challenges are being faced
qs yOl eiv mier by Chalon ; Leadership style
s tN mD ss:Chalon
m i g h t moves to Greenville,
b e a t the root South California
F Abeing
to lead
Sieoatnuopf m4 ,o0n0th0lypepeorpfloerm ance
• ProfesNqsCuE ieosntaiolisn emd is the
di•vis R
and was very critical about poor ts id e§rsJeff Armstrong, the H R head,
acceptance
of o u
q achievement
reviews for sales team

S u c ce s s f u l c a re e r conveyed
Fo r h im m i n im u m s ta ndard of B u s inheisms tpheaot
thouf scafapra:b il it i e s
achievement
Always upfront § was
Tandr a1very
i1ned
0 % demanding
as an engineer
and at one of France’s
didn’t
prestigious pcloelleaareg uveesryanfdo rsmubaol rdinates
want raGgreancodmespEla coelenscy§ bSytap rtaeids ian tg an
en co u to cen tra lize§dHOe rigs ahnaivziantgiotnrosuble
• E v en§ifL1 iv0company
e 0d • Meetings
motivating : Direct and
subordinate
• European oil Po werscfohisuml pClEaOinsed– aGbeonuet
% anep dowp olerkdeidnf’otra6g ryeearot s open § Chalon need to turn the division
ihnisthpelaUn .sKh e took it for granted and instead h is
r Ua lly around
m anag ithemiEent stylee a rs
of asking for their views § Com pa D w
I TNEnie STAT
s a r nS 2
e OoFyrg
AM EnR Iized
ahim C A ? and
• Bluntlain gduisaagpeps roving if he didn’t get q Subordinates see as §
or information which he was expecting many
structured in
Blunt
we n t§ aWh eoarkded in 6 different countries – § Arrogant §
detailed
• Tried reports
to hide his expressions even if he was styles depending upon company
different Distant
withSpeaks
pleased four Industry and
History,
q Current situation at § Lacking People
results § D e m o ra lis in g
•Michelin:
Gav§e Tarafeileinligngbeohf ibn edincgomdipsetatintot M an ag e m e n t
skills
inappropriate to discuss about
family § Poor sales and financial results in past
a nd cold by finding it
r s several quarters Power
§ BCG has recommended change of nce : People in U S generally do
Dista
strategy in tyre service business not pect that leader forces
taccept
I n h edmand
ul g ence : U Son is a society that accepts
§ In 2004, hired Chalon to decision
ex
relatively free gratification of basic and natural
implement a turnaround and
reinvent the human desires related to enjoying life and
business by dealing with various having fun compared with France
Question
a r ou nd 2 QuCesat isoen 5: W h a t specifi
ti c s t e p s w o u ld y o u r e c o m m e n d that C h a lon take in order
to turn this situation
?
• Call Upo uanninditial meeting to:
Hall'
• address the situation; C ultur
s
• Facto al H i g h - Low
let the subordinates know that from now on sincere eff o rt s w ou l d be taken
F a c t o rs
• r
Aosns tisetx: tOpen theOdvoeortrnteossg iovfemoepsisnaigocontext
Cfrom Chalon’s side enss and solve -c ontex
• Many covert a n d implicit M a n y ovt ceurltt aunr ed
the big isa
Foster cs relationship
uuel st uorr eproblem
built o l ttrus
s n mu t u am .
essages, with use of m es s a ge s that are
simple explicit
• side
Once the subordinates feel that Chalon is m akmingete affoprths otor aadnapdt troeUaSdsicnegnario, they
too
Trombe t w e e n t h
pe n a a rs '
• woulad nprob
Prioritize &dOrganize:
calbelyaprut Don’t overstretc
efforts hatht eios tnreatclhcguoallts u, grivee
from their
e li nn e s
• nd bottom-up feedbackd e l of
m o
ImplemDeinmt
d m eonere anftceemechanism
theiff r t he other
Q uest io n 4: S h o u l d h es try to a d a p t his st yle to b e m o r e Amer ic a n in the w ay h e pr o vides
etndba
fee
a opsc-dki o n dnlne aad s this
a ow
a m ? Or s h o uCldhhaertarycttoerreims ta§iincPsaeuot hpelen t ikceaenpd
merican t ea mSwpilel bce able to a d ju s t t o h is s t y l e? W ha t a re th e ris k s o f
§ B e li e v e t h a t re la ti o n s h ip s d o n ' t
cwo nosriks t aenntdinpteh reswoanyahlelipvreo sv idseespfaeerad btea c.k in the h o p e that his
• Ad a ptaibftilhiicer
u s in g ei
ty: O n e of the moba jjoer cchtiavraecsteristic s of s u c c es s fu l leader
( or b o th ) a p p ro a c h ?
h a v e m u c h o f a n im p a c t on work
• together without
§t toGtohesee rhaving
odculrtueoverlap a sgood
lea tisioenas iehr itphastheir natrryeingimto pimorptoas entthebsutattuths
Constructive Criticism: § Peopleshould be an between work and
Making one person adap
• ositives highlighted more than
P y b e li e v erelations
e §personal
Believe
negatives hip that good relationships are vital to meeting business
life.
qu o Dif on 4 0 0 0 emthplaoyte peseo ple c a n work
f objectives, and that their relationships with others will be the
us same, whether they are at work or meeting socially.
e § People spend time outside work hours with colleagues and
• Personal Connection: Ask about employees’ family life

• Praise for hard work & effort rather than pointing small mistakes & enlarging them to reach
perfection
Mutual Misreading: Talk with employees & help them decode his message in the way he wanted
• to convey
Socialization beyond work : Get to know the colleagues
• better
Associated Risk: To fill the gap between his staffs and him, he needs to share his personal information which is
• beyond his comfort zone

• Old style of feedback

• Provided very little or no positive


feedback
• Relentless when asked for
improvement
• Straightforward with criticism

• Had a direct style

• Three negative remark for every positive


work
• Expected counter arguments from sub-
ordinates
• Not enquiring whether subordinates actually
agreed
• Upfront with disapproval of
expectation

Not showing appreciation
• C O N S for old style of feedback

• Subordinates will remain


demotivated
He m a y lose valuable resources from the
• team
Negative feedback will eventually lower team
• performance
No relationship would get developed between Chalon & his subordinates

M a y hamper to achieve end results

He wont be able to gain trust and goodwill amon g his team members

Q uest io n 3: N o w that C h a lon is a w a r e of h o w his Amer ic a n staff perceive his m a n a g e m e n t
style, w h a t s t e p s w ou ld y o u r e c o m m e n d that h e take in order to impr o v e the w ay h e
mo t i v a t e s his staff ?
• Encourage initiative taking: Three positives for every negative

• Constructive feedback: Appreciate completed task and recognize changes for


improvement
Praises at every stage of work: Address the situations e.g. interaction with
• subordinates
Praise in public and criticize in private: Don’t expect counter-argument from
• subordinates
Should not mind the amalgamation of personal and professional life

Foster the friendly environment within the office by indulging with peers and
• subordinates

You might also like