PSM3 1

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

PSM 3 Introduction Political Theory

MEDARDO B. BOMBITA, LPT, DPA, PgD (M. ASEAN), PDDQM


Professorial Lecturer
Sovereignty and Divine Right
JUNIUS BRUTUS

 Written the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos which aims to


justify the concept of divine right is approached with a
critical perspective, challenging the traditional
absolutist understanding of divine right theory.

 Other authors of "Vindiciae " did not completely reject


the idea of divine right, but they reinterpreted it in a
way that emphasized limitations on the authority of
rulers.
 Limited Authority: The divine right of kings,
according to the authors, did not imply unlimited
or absolute authority. Instead, they argued that
rulers received their authority from God, but this
authority was limited by certain conditions and
obligations, including adherence to natural law
and protection of the rights of the people.
 Ruler's Accountability: The treatise
emphasized that rulers were accountable to
God for their actions. If a ruler violated
natural law or engaged in tyranny, they could
forfeit their divine right to rule.
 Contractual Relationship: "Vindiciae
Contra Tyrannos" suggested that there was
a kind of social contract between the ruler
and the people. Rulers were seen as having
a duty to protect the well-being and rights of
the people, and the people, in turn, owed
obedience to rulers who fulfilled this duty. If
rulers violated this contract, resistance could
be justified.
SUMMARY

 The divine right of kings was not a blank


check for absolute power.
 Instead, it came with responsibilities and
limitations, and rulers who failed to fulfill their
obligations could be justly resisted by the
people.
 This contributed to the development of later
political theories that advocated for limited
government, constitutionalism, and the idea
that political authority should be exercised in
accordance with moral and legal principles.
The Social Contract Theory
PRELUDE

 The concept of social contract theory is that in the


beginning man lived in the state of nature.

 They had no government and there was no law to


regulate them.

 There were hardships and oppression on the sections


of the society.
PRELUDE

 To overcome from these hardships they entered into


two agreements which are:

 Pactum Unionis. By the first pact of unionis,


people sought protection of their lives and property.
As,a result of it a society was formed where people
undertook to respect each other and live in peace
and harmony.
 Pactum Subjectionis.
 People united together and pledged to obey an authority and
surrendered the whole or part of their freedom and rights to
an authority.
 The authority guaranteed everyone protection of life, property
and to a certain extent liberty.
 Must agree to establish society by collectively and reciprocally
renouncing the rights they had against one another in the
State of Nature and they must imbue some one person or
assembly of persons with the authority and power to enforce
the initial contract.
 Ensure their escape from the State of Nature, they must both
agree to live together under common laws, and create an
enforcement mechanism for the social contract and the laws
that constitute it.

Thus, the authority or the government or the sovereign or the


state came into being because of the two agreements.

You might also like