Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14
PSM 3 Introduction Political Theory
MEDARDO B. BOMBITA, LPT, DPA, PgD (M. ASEAN), PDDQM
Professorial Lecturer Sovereignty and Divine Right JUNIUS BRUTUS
Written the Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos which aims to
justify the concept of divine right is approached with a critical perspective, challenging the traditional absolutist understanding of divine right theory.
Other authors of "Vindiciae " did not completely reject
the idea of divine right, but they reinterpreted it in a way that emphasized limitations on the authority of rulers. Limited Authority: The divine right of kings, according to the authors, did not imply unlimited or absolute authority. Instead, they argued that rulers received their authority from God, but this authority was limited by certain conditions and obligations, including adherence to natural law and protection of the rights of the people. Ruler's Accountability: The treatise emphasized that rulers were accountable to God for their actions. If a ruler violated natural law or engaged in tyranny, they could forfeit their divine right to rule. Contractual Relationship: "Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos" suggested that there was a kind of social contract between the ruler and the people. Rulers were seen as having a duty to protect the well-being and rights of the people, and the people, in turn, owed obedience to rulers who fulfilled this duty. If rulers violated this contract, resistance could be justified. SUMMARY
The divine right of kings was not a blank
check for absolute power. Instead, it came with responsibilities and limitations, and rulers who failed to fulfill their obligations could be justly resisted by the people. This contributed to the development of later political theories that advocated for limited government, constitutionalism, and the idea that political authority should be exercised in accordance with moral and legal principles. The Social Contract Theory PRELUDE
The concept of social contract theory is that in the
beginning man lived in the state of nature.
They had no government and there was no law to
regulate them.
There were hardships and oppression on the sections
of the society. PRELUDE
To overcome from these hardships they entered into
two agreements which are:
Pactum Unionis. By the first pact of unionis,
people sought protection of their lives and property. As,a result of it a society was formed where people undertook to respect each other and live in peace and harmony. Pactum Subjectionis. People united together and pledged to obey an authority and surrendered the whole or part of their freedom and rights to an authority. The authority guaranteed everyone protection of life, property and to a certain extent liberty. Must agree to establish society by collectively and reciprocally renouncing the rights they had against one another in the State of Nature and they must imbue some one person or assembly of persons with the authority and power to enforce the initial contract. Ensure their escape from the State of Nature, they must both agree to live together under common laws, and create an enforcement mechanism for the social contract and the laws that constitute it.
Thus, the authority or the government or the sovereign or the
state came into being because of the two agreements.