0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views21 pages

Week 3 - Realism

Uploaded by

Samet Akpınar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views21 pages

Week 3 - Realism

Uploaded by

Samet Akpınar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Realism

Realism
• The dominant theory of
International Relations (IR)
literature
• Bases on the rational choice
theory: the aim of actors is to
maximize their interests
• National interests, war, security
are major concerns of realism
States as the main actors
States are the principal and • The characteristics of states:
most important actors 1. Border
2. Population
But, what about non-state 3. Central government
actors?
4. Recognized by each other
5. Sovereign(ty)
States are Sovereign
• Sovereignty: the principle that within its territorial boundaries the state is the
supreme political authority, and that outside those boundaries the state
recognizes no higher political authority
• Sovereign states ;
have the right to exercise complete authority over their own territories internally
o There is an unwritten contract between individuals and the state: liberty vs.
guarantee of security
are independent from other states externally
o The sovereignty of states prevents the establishment of a world government and
political authority
 sovereignty is states’ distinguishing/unique feature
States are rational unitary
actors
• States are unitary actors:
States act as a unique, single
body
the government speaks with
one voice for the state
• States are rational actors:
states are goal-oriented and
follow their interests
States make cost-benefit
analysis
What is anarchy and anarchic
system?
• Anarchy: the lack of a
centralized authority

• Anarchic system : a system


operating in the absence of any
central gov.
No anarchy at the domestic
level
• What life would be like for us, if we lived in a state of
anarchy at the domestic level?
no state, no political authority with a judicial system, no
police forces, no court, no prison
The answer: continuous war – all against all
 When we look at the the failed states, we can see anarchy
and its impact on the society.
State=> an escape from
anarchy?
• To avoid this kind of brutial life & to ensure their security, humans
created states
state => a way to escape from anarchy for people
• States prevent anarchy at the domestic level but what about at the
international level?
• The international system is anarchic because there is no higher
authority above states- no world goverment
States always have to protect themselves through armed forces
Implications of Anarchy
• Anarchy leads to self-help
situations
Self-help: in realist theory, each
state must take care of itself
no international 911 number
that states can call when their
security is threatened
• What about international
organizations?
Implications of Anarchy
• Anarchy also encourages states to
preserve a balance of power/ equilibrium

• Goal: prevent a state or a coalition of


states from dominating others

• The balance of power can be achieved in


2 ways:
 increasing military capabilities
increasing power through alliances
Implications of Anarchy

• The exercise of self-help leads to the security dilemma


security dilemma: When a state arms itself, other states feel
themselves threatened and they also arm themselves to protect their
own national security interests
A dilemma because all states begin competing over security measures
=> leads to an arms race
even if a state is arming only for defensive purposes, in a self-help
system, states think the worst case scenario
States do not feel more secure than before
Implications of Anarchy

Anarchy => Self-help System => Security Dilemma => War


1- Classical Realism

Thucydides, Machiavelli, T. Hobbes, E. H. Carr, N. Spykman, H. J.


Morgenthau, H.Kissinger, S. Huntington
Classical realists argue that;
1. International politics is driven for power
2. International politics has its roots in human nature
The state reflects the characteristic of the people
3. It is not possible to escape from the human condition: no permanent
solutions to the problems of politics
Classical Realists
1- Thucydides;
The first writer in the realist tradition & the
founding father of the IR discipline
IR => inevitable conflicts btw Ancient Greek
city states and their neighbours
States are unequal but this is natural
Inequality in power and capabilities: states
must be aware of this fact to survive
Classical Realists
Thucydides;
• Statespeople have the restricted area to act =>
operate according to the principles and practices
of power politics
• security and survival are the main values
• Focused on the nature of war => the main
reason of the war was fear related to a shift in
the balance of power
• Ex: the war between Athens and Sparta
Classical Realists
Thucydides;
• Shift in the balance of power -> efforts to change it -> causes fear,
suspicion and mistrust
• The cause of the fear=> a consequence of politics between states
• No central authority above states :
 the strong do what they want, the weak do what they must
power and capabilities of states determine the result of the war.
Classical Realists
2. Machiavelli
• national freedom, independence: the
highest value
• main resposibility of rulers: to
defend the interests of their state &
to ensure its survival
• The ruler must be a lion (power) & a
fox (deception)
Classical Realists
Machiavelli
• world is a dangerous and an opportune place: to survive, be
aware of dangers and take precautions
• the responsible stateleaders must not act according to the
principles of Christian ethics, otherwise they will lose everything
• The main values are the security and survival of the state and
they must guide the foreign policy of a state.
• the rulers do not only have responsibility to themselves but also
to their country & citizens=> the moral side of Machiavellian &
classical realism
Classical Realists
3. Thomas Hobbes
• The ‘state of nature’: an unfavourable human
condition in which there is a permanent ‘state of
war’
• in their natural condition, no one can be confident
about his/her security and survival
• possible to escape from the ‘state of nature’ into a
civilized human condition: through the creation of a
sovereign state
• People are civilized by fear of death: common fear
drives them away from their natural condition and
they cooperate to create a state that has power to
protect them
Classical Realists
Thomas Hobbes:
• the creation of a state to escape threats also creates a
serious political problem
• what about the condition of int. insecurity?
not possible to escape due to the lack of a global state
/world government (anarchy of the state system)
states are not willing to give up their independence for
the sake of any global security guarantee
int. state of nature btw states is less dangerous than the
original state of nature
• int. state of nature is a condition of actual or potential
war
Classical Realists
Hans J. Morgenthau:
• IR is a discipline which is based on the concepts of
national interest and power
• For him, humanbeings are evil by nature=> they are born
to pursue power
• politics is a struggle for power => politics reflect the
characters of human beings who created it
• The final political space within which security is ensured
is the independent state. Beyond the state, security is
impossible.

You might also like