0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views28 pages

OS Chapter 2-2

operating system

Uploaded by

mikimeba2023
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views28 pages

OS Chapter 2-2

operating system

Uploaded by

mikimeba2023
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Operating Systems

Deadlocks
Topics
• System Model
• Deadlock Characterization
• Methods for Handling Deadlocks
• Deadlock Prevention
• Deadlock Avoidance
• Deadlock Detection
• Recovery from Deadlock
• Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling
The Deadlock Problem
• A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to
acquire a resource held by another process in the set.
• Example
– System has 2 tape drives.
– P1 and P2 each hold one tape drive and each needs another one.
• Example
• semaphores A and B , initialized to 1
P0 P1
------ ------
wait(A) wait(B)
wait(B) wait(A)
Example: bridge crossing

• Traffic only in one direction.


– Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource.
– If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car
backs up (preempt resources and rollback).
– Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock
occurs.
– Starvation is possible.
System Model
• Resource types R1 , R2 , ..., Rm-1
• Examples of resource types - CPU cycles, memory
space, I/O devices
• Each resource type Ri has Wi instances.
• e.g. 2 CPUs, 1 Floppy Disk, 2 Hard Disks
• Each process utilizes a resource (using system
calls) as follows:
– request
– use
– release
Deadlock Characterization – deadlock
can arise if four conditions hold
simultaneously
• Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a
resource.
• Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is
waiting to acquire additional resources held by other
processes.
• No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily
by the process holding it, after that process has completed
its task.
• Circular wait: there exists a set {P0 , P1 , ..., Pn } of waiting
processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource that is held
by P1 , P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P2 , ..., Pn
-1 is waiting for a resource that is held by Pn , and Pn is
waiting for a resource that is held by P 0 .
Resource-Allocation Graph – a diagram
showing allocations
• A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
• V is partitioned into two types:
– P = {P1 , P2 , ..., Pn }, the set consisting of all the
processes in the system.
– R = {R 1 , R 2 , ..., Rm }, the set consisting of all
resource types in the system.
• request edge - directed edge Pi -> Rj
• assignment edge - directed edge Rj -> Pi
• Example
• Process
Cont’d
• Resource type with 4 instances

• Pi requests instance of R j

• Pi is holding an instance of R j
Cont’d
• Example of a resource-allocation graph with
no cycles
Cont’d
• Example of a resource-allocation graph with a
cycle
Cont’d
• If graph contains no cycles -> no deadlock.
• If graph contains a cycle ->
– if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock.
– if several instances per resource type, possibility of
deadlock.
• e.g. R={1r1,2r2,1r3},E={(p1,r1),(p2,r3),(r1,p2),
(r2,p2),(r2,p1),(r3,p3),(p3,r2)}
• e.g. R={2r1,2r2},E={(p1,r1),(r1,p2),(r1,p3),(r2,p1),
(p3,r2),(r2,p4)}
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
• Ensure that the system will never enter a
deadlock state. (traffic lights)
• Allow the system to enter a deadlock state
and then recover. (back up cars)
• Ignore the problem and pretend that
deadlocks never occur in the system; used by
most operating systems, including UNIX.
Deadlock Prevention - restrain the ways
resource requests can be made
• Mutual Exclusion - not required for sharable resources; must hold
for nonsharable resources.
• Hold and Wait - must guarantee that whenever a process requests
a resource, it does not hold any other resources.
– Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it
begins execution, or allow process to request resources only when the
process has none.
– Low resource utilization; starvation possible.
• No Preemption -
– If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource
that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources
currently being held are released.
– Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the
process is waiting.
– Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as
well as the new ones that it is requesting.
• Circular Wait - impose a total ordering of all resource types, and
require that each process requests resources in an increasing order
of enumeration.
Deadlock Avoidance - requires that the
system has some additional a priori
information available
• Simplest and most useful model requires that
each process declare the maximum number of
resources of each type that it may need.
• The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically
examines the resource-allocation state to ensure
that there can never be a circular-wait condition.
• Resource-allocation state is defined by the
number of available and allocated resources, and
the maximum demands of the processes
Safe State - when a process requests an available
resource, system must decide if immediate allocation
leaves the system in a safe state
• System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all
processes.
• Sequence <P1 , P2 , ..., Pn > is safe if for each Pi , the
resources that Pi can still request can be satisfied by the
currently available resources plus the resources held by all
the Pj , with j < i.
– If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi can
wait until all Pj have finished.
– When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute,
return allocated resources, and terminate.
– When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources, and
so on.
• If a system is in safe state -> no deadlocks.
• If a system is in unsafe state -> possibility of deadlock.
• Avoidance -> ensure that a system will never enter an
unsafe state.
Cont’d
• e.g. 12 instances of a resource.
Max Needs Current Needs
p0 10 5
P1 4 2
P2 9 2
• systems is safe because <p1, p0, p2> satisfies safety condition. The
following diagram shows how deadlock can occur. At point t, any move
upwards would enter an unsafe state
Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm
• Claim edge Pi -> Rj indicates that process Pi may
request resource Rj ; represented by a dashed
line.
• Claim edge converts to request edge when a
process requests a resource.
• When a resource is released by a process,
assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge.
• Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
• Example
• E={(r1,p1)} C={(p1,r2),(p2,r1),(p2,r2)}
• no cycles -> system is safe
• now if p2 requests r2 -> system is unsafe
Banker's Algorithm (Dijkstra 1965)
• Multiple resource types.
• Each process must a priori claim maximum use.
• When a process requests a resource it may have to wait.
• When a process gets all its resources it must return them in
a finite amount of time.
• Data Structures for the Banker's algorithm where n =
number of processes, and m = number of resource types.
– Available: Vector of length m. If Available[j] = k, there are k
instances of resource type Rj available.
– Max: n x m matrix. If Max[i,j] = k, then process Pi may request
at most k instances of resource type R j .
– Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k, then Pi is currently
allocated k instances of R j .
– Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k more
instances of
• Rj to complete its task.
• Need[i,j] = Max[i,j] - Allocation[i,j]
Example: consider the following:
• A banker 10 thousand dollars and four customers Florence, Dougal, Dylan and
Zebedee each customer has a maximum need and and starts owing nothing.
Name Used Max
Florence 0 6
Dougal 0 5
Dylan 0 4
Zebedee 0 7
Available = 10 Safe
Name Used Max
Florence 1 6
Dougal 1 5
Dylan 2 4
Zebedee 4 7
Available = 2 Safe, because any requests for loans, except to Dylan, can wait until
Dylan repays his loan
Name Used Max
Florence 1 6
Dougal 2 5
Dylan 2 4
Zebedee 4 7
Available = 1 Unsafe, since if all customers ask for their maximum, none will get it,
causing deadlock
Safety Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively.
Initialize:
Work := Available
Finish[i] := false for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
2. Find an i such that both:
Finish[i] = false
Need i <= Work (every element in Needi < every element in
Work)
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work := Work + Allocation I
Finish[i] := true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish[i] = true for all i, then the system is in a safe state.
• May require an order of m x n 2 operations to decide
whether a state is safe
Resource-Request Algorithm for process Pi
• Request i = request vector for process Pi .
• If Request i [ j ] = k , then process Pi wants k instances of
resource type R j .
1. If Request i <= Need i , go to step 2. Otherwise, raise
error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum
claim.
2. If Request i <= Available, go to step 3. Otherwise, Pi must
wait, since resources are not available.
3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by
modifying the state as follows:
• Available := Available - Request i ;
• Allocation i := Allocation i + Request i ;
• Need i := Need i - Request i ;
– If safe -> the resources are allocated to Pi .
– If unsafe -> Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state
is restored
Example of Banker's algorithm
• 5 processes P 0 through P4 ; 3 resource types A (10
instances), B (5 instances), and C (7 instances).
• Snapshot at time T 0 :
Allocation Max Available Need
---------- --- --------- -----
ABC ABC ABC ABC
P0 0 1 0 753 332 743
P1 2 0 0 322 122
P2 3 0 2 902 600
P3 2 1 1 222 011
P4 0 0 2 433 431
• Sequence <P1, P3, P4, P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
• P1 now requests resources
Cont’d
• Request 1 = (1,0,2).
Check that Request 1 <= Available (that is, (1,0,2) <= (3,3,2)) ->
true.
Allocation Need Available
---------- --- ---------
ABC ABC ABC
P0 010 743 230
P1 302 020
P2 302 600
P3 211 011
P4 002 431
– Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence <P1, P3, P4, P0,
P2>n satisfies safety requirement.
• From this state, can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted?
• From this state, can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?

Deadlock Detection
Allow system to enter deadlock state
• Detection algorithm
• Recovery scheme
• Single Instance of Each Resource Type
• Maintain wait-for graph
– Nodes are processes.
– Pi ->Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj .
• Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the
graph.
• An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an order of n 2
operations, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
• Several Instances of a Resource Type
• Data structures
– Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of available
resources of each type.
– Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of each
type currently allocated to each process.
– Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each
process. If Request[i,j] = k, then process Pi is requesting k more
instances of resource type Rj
Detection Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively.
Initialize:
Work := Available.
For i = 1, 2, ..., n, if Allocationi <> 0, then Finish[i] := false;
otherwise,
Finish[i] := true.
2. Find an index i such that both:
1. Finish[i] = false.
2. Request i <= Work.
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work := Work + Allocation i
Finish[i] := true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish[i] = false, for some i, 1 <= i <= n, then the system is in a
deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] = false, then Pi is deadlocked.
• Algorithm requires an order of m x n2 operations to detect whether
the system is in a deadlocked state.

Example of Detection algorithm
Five processes P 0 through P4 ; three resource types A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6
instances).
• ·Snapshot at time T 0 :
Allocation Request Available
---------- ------- ---------
ABC ABC ABC
P0 010 000 000
P1 200 202
P2 303 000
P3 211 100
P4 002 002
• Sequence <P0, P2, P3, P1, P4> will result in Finish[i] = true for all i.
• P2 requests an additional instance of type C.
Request
-------
ABC
P0 000
P1 202
P2 001
P3 100
P4 002
• State of system?
– Can reclaim resources held by process P0 , but insufficient resources to fulfill other processes' requests.
– Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1 , P2 , P3 , and P4
Detection-Algorithm Usage
• When, and how often, to invoke depends on:
– How often a deadlock is likely to occur?
– How many processes will need to be rolled back?
• one for each disjoint cycle
• If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be many cycles in the
resource graph and so we would not be able to tell which of the many deadlocked
processes ``caused'' the deadlock.
• Recovery from Deadlock
• Process termination
– Abort all deadlocked processes.
– Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated.
– In which order should we choose to abort?
• Priority of the process.
• How long process has computed, and how much longer to completion.
• Resources the process has used.
• Resources process needs to complete.
• How many processes will need to be terminated.
• Is process interactive or batch?
Cont’d
• Resource Preemption
– Selecting a victim - minimize cost.
– Rollback - return to some safe state, restart process from
that state.
– Starvation - same process may always be picked as victim;
include number of rollback in cost factor.
• Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling
• Combine the three basic approaches (prevention, avoidance,
and detection), allowing the use of the optimal approach for
each class of resources in the system.
• Partition resources into hierarchically ordered classes.
• Use most appropriate technique for handling deadlocks
within each class

You might also like