Chapter 1 of Audit II
Chapter 1 of Audit II
18
20
Precision measures the closeness between a sample estimate and the
population characteristic being estimated.
Allowance for sampling risk (AFSR) is the uncertainty that results from
sampling. It is the difference between the expected mean of the population
and the tolerable deviation or misstatement.
Allowance for sampling risk is the range set by + and - limits from the sample
results within which the true value of the population characteristics being
measured is likely to lie.
Example:
Suppose an auditor expects that a control would have a 3% deviation (failure)
rate and s/he was willing to tolerate a deviation rate of 5%, the allowance for
sampling risk would be 2% (i.e. 5% - 3% = 2%).
Assume the auditor tested 50 items and found one deviation, the sample
deviation rate is 2% (i.e. 1/50 = 0.02). If the upper tolerable limit is 3.5%, the
allowance for sampling risk would be 1.5%
Types of Audit Sampling
21
29
33
Step 1: State the objectives of the audit test
When auditors sample for tests of details of balances, the objective is to determine
whether the account balance being audited is fairly stated.
Sampling may be used for substantive testing to test the reasonableness of
assertions about a financial statement amount, and to develop an estimate of
some amount.
Step 2: Define Misstatement Conditions
Misstatement conditions are any conditions that represent a monetary
misstatement in a sample item.
A misstatement is defined as the difference between monetary amounts in the
client’s records and amounts supported by audit evidence.
Step 3: Define the population and the sampling units
In testing for the existence objective, the recorded dollar population is the
population.
For MUS the population is defined as the monetary value of an account balance,
such as accounts receivable, investment securities, or inventory
Cont’d…
34
Step 4: Determine the sample size
Factors to be considered:
1. Variation within the population
Population variation and sample size have direct relationship in classical variables sampling.
As population variation increases, the sample size should increase
Population variation Can be minimized by stratifying the population
Population variation does not affect the sample size when monetary unit sampling is used because the
sample selection method considers indirectly.
2. Acceptable risk of incorrect acceptance (type II error)
There is an inverse relationship between risk of incorrect acceptance and the sample size
The lower the risk for incorrect acceptance, the larger the sample size must be
3. Tolerable misstatement
The tolerable misstatement is the amount of the preliminary judgment about materiality that is allocated
to an account
The tolerable misstatement is the maximum amount by which the account can be misstatement with the
auditor still accepting the account as being fairly presented
Tolerable misstatement is inversely related to sample size.
The lower the amount of tolerable misstatement, the larger the sample size must be.
Cont’d…
35
4. Expected misstatement
The expected misstatement is the amount of misstatement that the
auditor believes exists in the population.
The expected misstatement can be developed based on the assessment of
inherent risk, prior year's results, a pilot sample, the results of related
substantive tests, or the results of tests of controls.
There is a direct relationship between expected misstatement and sample
size.
The larger the expected misstatement, the larger the sample size must be
5. Population size
Population size is directly related to sample size
The larger the population size, the larger the sample size must be.
Cont’d…
36
Determination of sample size for Monetary-Unit Sampling:
Attribute sampling table can be used
Steps:
1. Determine the risk for incorrect acceptance
2. Convert the tolerable misstatement and the expected misstatement to
percentages of book value
3. Determine sample size using the following formula:
Cont’d…
37
Example
Suppose the auditor has established a tolerable misstatement of Br. 250,000 and
an expected misstatement of Br. 50,000 for an account receivable account with a
book value of Br. 5,000,000. The risk of incorrect acceptance is 5% and the
corresponding reliability factor and expansion factor (adjustment of expected
misstatement for the risk of incorrect acceptance) are 3.00 and 1.6 respectively.
Note that the reliability factor and expansion factor are obtained from relevant
tables.
a) Tolerable misstatement rate = 250,000/5,000,000 = 0.05
b) Expected misstatement = 10,000/5,000,000 = 0.01
c) Sample size (n)
Cont’d…
38
For Monetary-Unit Sampling, (by applying systematic
sampling method) probability-proportional-to-size method is
used, which gives each birr in the population an equal change
of being selected and divides the population in to equal
groups of birr. Each group of birr represents a sampling
interval, which is obtained by dividing the book value of the
population by the sample size
Assume a client’s book value of accounts receivable is
Br.5,000,000, and the auditor determined a sample size of 88.
The sampling interval will be Br. 56,818. The auditor randomly
selects a number between o and 56,818 and then select every
56,818th Birr to identify the balance to be included in the
sample.
Cont’d…
39
Step 6: Perform the audit procedures/Test
Step 7: Evaluate the sample results
Step 8: Draw final conclusions
Step 9: Document the sampling procedures
40
End of chapter one
Thank you