Scribd
Upload
104 views31 pages

Meteorological Factors Affecting Air Pollution

Uploaded by

reya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
104 views31 pages

Meteorological Factors Affecting Air Pollution

Uploaded by

reya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Meteorological factors affecting air

pollution
• Primary Metrological Parameter
–Wind speed and Direction
• – temperature
– Atmospheric Stability
– mixing height
–Secondary Metrological Parameter
– Solar radiation
– precipitation and humidity
– visibility
The parameters vary widely as a function of latitude,
season and Topography.
Windrose
Stability
• Dry adiabatic lapse rate – temperature
decreases due to lower pressure (ideal gas law)

dT
   dz  1.00 C/100 m  -5.4 F
/1000 ft
• Ambient (actual) lapse rate
< Г (temperature falls faster) unstable or
superadiabatic
> Г (temperature falls slower) stable or
subadiabatic
= Г (same rate) neutral
Example
Z(m) T(ºC)
2 -3.05
318 -
6.21

T T2  T1

 6.21 

3.05
 0.0100

C/m
•Standard Plume: Moderate wind speed:
•Moderate radiation, night time
•Horizontal dispersion at a right angle to the
wind is due to turbulence and diffusion, which
occurs at the same rate as the vertical
dispersion, which is not being opposed nor
encouraged by the stability (or lack of it) in the
atmosphere.
•Plume spreads equally in the vertical and
horizontal as it propagates downstream, forming
a coning plume
Example
Z(m) T(ºC)
10
5.11
202
1.09

T T2  T1
 
1.09  5.11

0.0209 C/m
•In unstable air, the plume will whip up and down as the atmosphere mixes
around (whenever an air parcel goes up, there must be air going down
someplace else to maintain continuity, and the plume follows these air currents).
This gives the plume the appearance that it is looping around.
•Vertical dispersion is very high.
•Less wind speed: Strong & Moderate radiation, day time Mechanical Turbulence
is enhanced.
•High probability of high concentrations sporadically at ground level close to
stack.
Example
Z(m)
T(ºC) 18
14.03
286
T12.56
T  12.56 14.03
 2
 286 18  0.0055 C/m
T1
z0.55z2C/100
  z1 Suppress Vertical Dispersion

m
Since lapse rate more positive than Г,
atmosphere is stable
•High wind speed: Night time, High horizontal dispersion, Vertical dispersion is
suppresses by stable atmosphere.

•In the vertical, dispersion is suppressed by the stability of the atmosphere, so


pollution does not spread toward the ground. This results in very low pollution
concentrations at the ground
Temperature Inversions
• Extreme case of stability when lapse rate
is actually positive, i.e. temperature
increases with altitude
• Resulting temperature inversion prevents
nearly all upward mixing
Fanning Plume:
Usually occurs at night, or 1200m-1800m above ground. There is high ground
concentration if stack is short or if plume moves through rugged terrain. Occurs
in stable inversion atmospheric conditions.
Lofting Plume: favorable in the sense that fewer impacts
at ground level. Pollutants go up into environment. They
are created when atmospheric conditions are unstable
above the plume
Fumigation:
most dangerous plume: contaminants are all coming
down to ground level. They are created when
atmospheric conditions are inversion stable above the
plume and unstable below. This happens most often
after the daylight sun has warmed the atmosphere,
which turns a night time fanning plume into fumigation
for about a half an hour.
Effect of Lapse Rate on
Plumes
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model
• Model Structure and Assumptions
– pollutants released from a “virtual point
source”
– advective transport by wind
– dispersive transport (spreading) follows
normal (Gaussian) distribution away from
trajectory
– constant emission rate
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model
• Model Structure and Assumptions (cont)
– wind speed constant with time and elevation
– pollutant is conservative (no reaction)
– pollutant is “reflected by ground”
– terrain is flat and unobstructed
– uniform atmospheric stability
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model
 E   2

  x, y,0, H  1  H   
2
 
  exp  2  s y   exp  
 sy s z u       2  sz 
 
Where χ = downwind concentration at 
ground level (g/m3)
E = emission rate of pollutant (g/s)
sy,sz = plume standard deviations (m)
u = wind speed (m/s)
x, y, z, H = distances (m)
Point Source Gaussian Plume
Model – Effective Stack
Height
H  h  H
where
H = Effective stack height (m)
h = height of physical stack (m)
ΔH = plume rise (m)
Point Source Gaussian Plume
Model – Effective Stack
• Heightformula
Holland’s

vs 
H  u 1.5 
2
 PT s  Ta  
d 
   T a 
2.6810 
where vs = stack velocity (m/s)
d = stack diameter (m)
u = wind speed (m)
P = pressure (kPa)
Ts = stack temperature (ºK)
Ta = air temperature (ºK)
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model – Stability
Categories

A Extremely Unstable D Neutral


B Moderately Unstable E Slightly Stable
C Slightly Unstable F Moderately Stable
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model –
Horizontal Dispersion
Point Source Gaussian
Plume Model – Vertical
Dispersion
Point Source Gaussian Plume
Model – Wind Speed Correction
• Unless the wind speed at the virtual stack
height is known, it must be estimated from the
ground wind speed
where ux = wind speed at
 z2  elexation zx
u2  up1 
 z1 
p = empirical constant

Example
• A stack in an urban area is emitting 80 g/s
of NO. It has an effective stack height
of 100 m. The wind speed is 4
m/s at 10 m. It is a clear summer day
with the sun nearly overhead. Estimate
the ground level concentration at a) 2 km
downwind on the centerline and b) 2 km
downwind,
0.1 km off the centerline.
Example
1. Determine stability class
Assume wind speed is 4 km at ground
surface. Description suggests
strong solar radiation.
Stability class B
Example
2. Estimate the wind speed at the effective stack
height
Note: effective stack height given – no need to
calculate using Holland’s formula

0.15
 z2  100   5.65
u2  up1   
 z1   10  m/s
4
Example
3. Determine σy and
σz σy = 290
σ z = 220

220
290
Example
4. Determine concentration
using Eq a. x = 2000, y = 0

80  2
 
1  0  1  100  2 
C(2000,0)  exp   exp   
 (290)(220)(5.6) 2  290   2  220 
   
C(2000,0)  6.4310 g/m  64.3
5 3

μg/m3
Example

b. x = 2000, y = 0.1 km = 100 m

80  
1  100  2
 1  100  2 
C(2000,100)  exp   exp   
 (290)(220)(5.6)  2  290   2  220 
   
C(2000,0)  6.06 105 g/m3  60.6
μg/m3

You might also like