3 Lesson
3 Lesson
3 Lesson
• 1. Visual/eye contact
• 2. Vocal qualities
• 3. Verbal tracking
• 4. Body language: Attentive
• 1. Visual/eye contact:
• There is considerable variation in what different cultures define as
appropriate eye contact. Individuals also vary greatly in their eye-
contact patterns.
• For some therapists, sustaining eye contact during an interview is
natural.
• For others, it can be difficult; there may be a tendency to look down
or away from the client’s eyes because of respect, shyness, or cultural
dynamics.
• The same is true for clients; some prefer more intense and direct eye
contact; others will prefer looking at the floor, the wall, or anywhere
but into your eyes
• With most clients, it’s appropriate to maintain more constant eye
contact as they speak and less constant eye contact when you speak
Body Language:
• Positive body language includes the following (derived from Walters, 1980):
• • Leaning slightly toward the client.
• • Maintaining a relaxed but attentive posture.
• • Placing your feet and legs in an unobtrusive position.
• • Keeping your hand gestures unobtrusive and smooth.
• • Minimizing the number of other movements.
• • Matching your facial expressions to your feelings or the client’s feelings.
• • Sitting approximately one arm’s length from the client.
• • Arranging the furniture to draw you and the client together, not to erect a
barrier
Vocal Qualities
• I advise you:
• first ask your friends or your lecturer to listen to you and get
feedback on the tone of your voice.
• As with body language, it’s often useful to follow the client’s lead,
speaking in a volume and tone similar to the client.
• Meier and Davis (2011) refer to this practice as “pacing the client” (p.
9).
• The therapist should adjust the pace according to the client…………
• On the other hand, therapists can use voice tone and speech rate to
lead clients toward particular content or feelings.
• Keep in mind that there are both individual and cultural differences when
conducting interviews
MOVING BEYOND ATTENDING
• Differences among clients make it impossible to reliably predict their
reactions to various interviewing responses.
• Some clients react positively to therapist behaviors that might seem
inadequate or awkward;
• others react negatively to what might be considered a perfect
paraphrase
• Meier and Davis (2011) advised:
• “When you don’t know what to say, say
nothing”
• Margaret Gibbs (1984) expressed the distress many new therapists experience:
• BUT;
• It takes time for most therapists and clients to get comfortable with
silence.
• Silence can frighten both therapists and clients.
• Most people feel awkward about silence in social settings and strive
to keep conversations alive.
• …………………………………………………
• Client 1 : Yesterday was my day off. I just sat around the house doing
nothing. I had some errands to run, but I couldn’t seem to make
myself get up off the couch and do them.
• Therapist 1: yesterday was your day off and you had trouble getting
going on your day off
• Client 2: I do this with every assignment. I wait until the last minute
and then whip together the paper. I end up doing all-nighters. I don’t
think the final product is as good as it could be.
• ………………………………………..
• How do you paraphase this sentence?
• Client 2: I do this with every assignment. I wait until the last minute
and then whip together the paper. I end up doing all-nighters. I don’t
think the final product is as good as it could be.
• Therapist 2: Waiting until the last minute has become a pattern for
you and you think it makes it so you don’t do as well as you could on
your assignments
• ****Simple paraphrases also don’t include
therapist opinion, reactions, or
commentary, whether positive or negative..
• Therapist 5 ………………………………………..
• Therapist 5 is using a psychodynamic approach.
• 2) The Sensory-Based Paraphrase:
• For instance, often clients come for therapy because of feeling stuck
and not making progress in terms of personal growth or problem
resolution.
• In such a case, a therapist might reflect, “It seems like you’re spinning
your wheels” or “Dealing with this has been a real uphill battle.”
• 4) Intentionally Directive Paraphrases:
• Rogers considers this technique as a means of showing empathy and
compassion, while at the same time helping clients move beyond
their negative or traumatic feelings from the past
• Examples:
• Client 1: I feel like cutting myself.
• Therapist 1: You’ve felt like cutting yourself.
• [In this example the therapist is validating the client, but shifting to
past tense.
• Client 2: I have flashbacks all the time.
• Therapist 2: So you have flashbacks a lot of the time.
• [In this example the therapist transforms the client’s verbal
disclosure from a global to a partial perception.]
• Insoo Kim Berg was famous for her ability to focus on, magnify, and
paraphrase back a small positive client statement—even if the
statement was surrounded by or covered up with negative content.
• For Berg, the decision regarding what to paraphrase back to her
clients was simple.
• She believed all therapists lead their clients and so they may as well
intentionally lead their clients in positive directions
• The basic belief:
• Since we cannot avoid leading, the question becomes, “Where shall
we lead our clients?”
• Let ‘s remember this example:
• original nondirective listening example
• We didn’t have much money when I was growing up, and I suppose
that frustrated my father. He beat us five kids all the time. He’s dead
now, but to this day, my mom says we needed the discipline. But I
hated it then and swore I’d never be like him. Now that I’m grown
and have kids of my own, I’m doing okay, but sometimes I feel I need
to discipline my kids more ... harder... do you know what I mean?
• Your answer please?
• Take a moment and try to imagine what positive part of this statement
Berg might choose to paraphrase. Perhaps Berg would have said
something like:
• “Now that you’re grown and have your own kids, you see yourself as
doing okay!” or “So, you swore that would never be like your father and
clearly, you aren’t!” Similar to Carl Rogers with a twist, these solution- or
strength-focused reflections intentionally lead clients toward the
positive. There are many different names for these intentionally leading
responses, including: positive reconstruction, finding the exception, or
focusing on sparkling moments
Clarification
• There are several forms of clarification and they all serve a common
purpose: to make clear for yourself and the client precisely what has
been said.
• 1) The most basic fom:
• It’s used when you don’t quite hear what a client said and you need
to recheck.
• I’m sorry, I didn’t quite hear that. Could you repeat what you said?
• 2) The second form of clarification consists of a restatement
imbedded in a double question.
• A double question is an either/or question including two or more
choices of response for the client.
• Interest-excitement Distress
• Disgust Shame
• Joy Anger
• Contempt Guilt
• Surprise Fear
Summarization
• Summarization demonstrates accurate listening, enhances client and
therapist recall of major themes, helps clients focus on important
issues, and extracts or refines the meaning behind client messages.
• Depending on how much your clients talk, summarization can be used
intermittently throughout a session and then at the end.
• Therapist 1: You’ve said a lot in the past 10 minutes and so I want to
make sure I’m tracking your main concerns. You talked about the
conflicts between you and your parents, about how you’ve felt angry
and neglected, and about how it was a relief, but also a big
adjustment, to be placed in a foster home. And you also said you’re
doing better than you thought you’d be doing. Does that cover the
main points of what you’ve talked about so far?
• Client 1: Yeah. That about covers it.
• Although summarization is conceptually simple, coming up with a
summary can be difficult. Your memory of what your client said
sometimes may fade quickly, leaving you without an accurate or
complete recollection.
• Sometimes, therapists take on too much responsibility.
• For example: You’ve mentioned four main issues today. First, you said
your childhood was hard because of your father’s authoritarian style.
Second, in your current marriage, you find yourself overly critical of
your wife’s parenting. Third, ……………………………And fourth, uh, fourth
[long pause], uh, sorry, I forgot the fourth one—but I’m sure it will
come to me !
• In general, you should use an interactive summary.
• First, doing so takes pressure off your memory. Second, it places
responsibility on clients to state what they think is important. Third,
an interactive approach models a collaborative relationship
Guidelines for Summarizing
• Overall, when summarizing content from an interview, be informal,
collaborative, supportive, and hopeful:
• • Informal
• Instead of saying, “Here’s my summary of what you’ve said,” say
something like, “Let’s make sure I’m keeping up with the main things
you talked about.” Instead of numbering your points, simply state
them one by one. That way you won’t be embarrassed by forgetting a
point.
• • Collaborative
• Instead of taking the lead, ask clients to summarize (e.g., “What seemed most
important to you during our meeting?”).
• This allows you to hear your client’s view before offering your own. You can always
add what you thought was important later.
• If you do take the lead in summarizing, pause intermittently so your client can
agree, disagree, or elaborate.
• At the end of your part of the summary, ask if what you’ve said seems accurate
(e.g., “Does that seem to fit with what you recall?”).
• Using a collaborative approach can feel empowering to clients. You might say, “I’m
interested in what you feel has been most important of all you’ve covered today.”
• • Supportive
• It can be very supportive to acknowledge your client’s efforts.
• For example, “You’ve said a lot” or “I appreciate your openness with
me” are reassuring and supportive statements that help clients feel
good about what they’ve shared.
• Of course, you should only make these supportive statements when
you believe them
• Hopeful
• When summarizing, it’s important to consciously or intentionally
decide how positive or hopeful you want your message to be.
Although it’s fine to be neutral and reflective, therapists who adhere
to a solution-focused perspective will avoid summarizing anything
negative
THE PULL TO REASSURANCE
• Reassurance, too, is a technique.
• Clients may behave in ways that tug on your impulse to say
something reassuring. They want to know if they’re good parents, if
they did the right thing, or if their sadness will lift.
• At some point you’re likely to feel the pull to tell them they’re doing
just fine.
DIRECTIVE LISTENING BEHAVIORS
• * Feeling Validation:
• The purpose of feeling validation is to help clients accept their
feelings as a natural part of being human. Feeling validation can be
ego boosting; clients feel supported and more normal because of
their therapist’s validating comments.
• Therapist 1: It’s okay for you to be sad about losing your mother.
That’s perfectly normal. Go ahead and cry if you feel like it.
• Therapists can also validate or reassure clients by using a concept
Yalom and Leszcz (2005) refer to as universality.
• Obviously, this client still has strong feelings about his ex-wife.
• Perhaps the relationship is over and the client wishes he could put it
behind him, but his nonverbal behavior—voice tone, body posture,
and facial expression—tells the therapist that he’s still emotionally
involved with his ex-wife
• Confrontation works best when ……………………………
• Confrontation works best when you have a working relationship with
the client and ample evidence to demonstrate the client’s emotional
or behavioral incongruity or discrepancy.
• Think about the preceding example
• Any evidence?
• we wouldn’t recommend using confrontation unless there was
additional evidence indicating the client’s unresolved feelings about
his ex-wife
• If there was supporting evidence, the following confrontation might
be appropriate:
• You mentioned last week that every time you think of your ex-wife
and how the relationship ended, you want revenge.
• And yet today, you’re saying you don’t have any feelings about her.
• But judging by your clenched fists, voice tone, and what you said last
week about her “screwing you over,” it seems like you still have very
strong feelings about her.
• Perhaps you wish those feelings would go away, but it sure looks like
they’re still there
• In this case, the therapist is using a reflection of content (or lack of
content) to gently confront the fact that the client was neglecting to
discuss his wife and the relevance of her departure on his mood
• In this case, the therapist is using a reflection of content (or lack of
content) to gently confront the fact that the client was neglecting to
discuss his wife and the relevance of her departure on his mood
• Firmer confrontations are sometimes useful.
• However, when therapists use more aggressive confrontations, they
run the risk of evoking client resistance.