Ion Implantation Chapter5
Ion Implantation Chapter5
Ion Implantation
Advantages of ion implantation
• Very precise dose control (Faradays cup).
The ion implanter forms a simple electrical circuit. By monitoring the current in the circuit (or by a
monitoring circuit with Faraday cups), significant accuracy in the implanted dose can be maintained.
Assuming a current sensitivity of nA, and a minimum required implantation time of 10 seconds, it can
be shown that doses as low as 1011cm-2, can be measured.
On the contrary, in chemical source pre-deposits, dose values less than 51013/cm2 are not achievable.
• Dose not limited to solubility: High dose introduction is not limited to solid solubility limit
values.
• Uniformity: Excellent doping uniformity is achieved across the wafer (< 1% variation across
12” wafer) and from wafer to wafer.
• Less dopant lateral diffusion, good for small device
(short channel).
• Less contamination: Done in high vacuum, it is a
very clean process step.
• Profile control: Besides precise dose control, one
can also control the profile (peak depth and spread
range) better than diffusion (peak concentration
always near surface).
(top) Doping by diffusion and “drive-in”.
(bottom) Doping by ion implantation with or without “drive-in”.
Advantages/disadvantage of ion implantation
Advantage:
• Low-temperature process (can use photoresist as mask)
• Wide selection of masking materials, e.g. photoresist, oxide, poly-Si, metal
• Very fast (6" wafer can take as little as 6 seconds for a moderate dose)
• Complex profiles can be achieved by multi-energy implants.
Disadvantage:
• Very expensive equipment ( $1M or more).
• At high dose values, throughput is less than diffusion (chemical source pre-
deposition on surface).
• Ions damage the semiconductor lattice. Not all the damage can be corrected by
annealing.
• Very shallow and very deep doping are difficult or impossible.
• Masking materials can be “knocked” into the wafer creating unwanted impurities,
or even destroying the quality of the interface.
Implantation equipment
Schematic of an ion implanter
• Ion source: operates at a high voltage(25kV) and convert the electrically neutral dopant
atoms in the gas phase into plasma ions and undesired species. Some sources: Arsine,
Phosphine, Diborane, … Solid can be sputtered in special ion sources.
• Mass spectrometer: a magnet bend the ion beam through right angle, and select the
desired impurity ion and purge undesired species. Selected ion passes through an aperture.
• Accelerator: add energy to beam up to 5MeV. (contained, to shield possible x-ray).
• Scanning system: x and y axis deflection plates are used to scan the beam across the wafer
to produce uniform implantation of desired dose. The beam is bended to prevent the
neutral particles from hitting the target .
Schematic of an ion implanter
Plasma ion source and ion extraction
Variable extraction voltage Positive ions are attracted to the exit side of
(typically 30KV ) the source chamber, which is biased at a large
negative potential with respect to the filament.
Most commercial mass filters have radius of By adjusting the magnetic field, only selected
meter or less ions will enter the accelerating column.
Ion acceleration
• There may be ions that collided with other ions in the beam, undergoing a charge exchange.
• Neutrals are highly undesirable since they will not be deflected in electrostatic end-station
scanning mechanisms.
• To avoid this problem, most systems are equipped with a bend, i.e. parallel plates of an
electrostatic deflection system.
• Neutrals are not deflected and so do not follow the beam, but instead strike a beam stop.
• The ions are sufficiently deflected by the plates to continue to travel down the tube.
Beam scanning
This type of implanter is suitable for low dose implants. The focused ion beam is
The beam current is adjusted to result in t > 10 sec/wafer. scanned over the wafer in a
With scan frequencies in the 100 Hz range, good implant highly controlled manner, in
uniformity is achieved with reasonable throughput. order, to achieve uniform
doping. Either the wafer or
the beam could be stationary.
Mechanical scanning
• Excellent wafer cooling needed.
• Substantial load/unload time.
• 15 - 25 wafers /disc.
• Excellent throughput for high dose implants.
• High current (20mA)
• Scan speed adjustment to ensure uniform dose.
Multi-wafer, mechanical
scanning end-station
The incident atom will strike the target atom and due to columbic interaction, the incident and
target atom scatters conserving both the momentum and energy. The energy lost by the
incident atom depends on the scattering angle which in turn depend on scattering parameter b
Ion Implantation Energy Loss Mechanism
Electron Stopping
Ions are embedded into the wafer and are scattered at random angles. The ions loose kinetic
energy, thus, slowing to a stop, by 2 mechanisms:
1. Non‐Local Electronic Stopping 2. Local Electronic Stopping
will not lose much energy. Thus, Sn is expected to increase with ion energy at low energy.
Nuclear Stopping
where
Total Energy Loss
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑆=
𝑑𝐸 𝑑𝐸
𝑑𝑥
=
𝑑𝑥( ) 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟
+ ( )
𝑑𝐸
𝑑𝑥 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐
=𝑆𝑛 + 𝑆𝑒
𝑅𝑃 0 0
𝑑𝐸 𝑑𝐸
𝑅 𝑝=∫ 𝑑𝑥=∫ =∫
0 𝐸0
𝑑𝐸 𝐸
𝑆 𝑛 +𝑆 𝑒
0
𝑑𝑥
Projected range (solid lines and left axis) and standard deviation (dashed lines and right
axis) for (A) n-type, (B) p-type,
Actual Profiles are not Gaussian
This approximation to the profile is good for lower energies, but is less correct of higher
energies where the profile is “skewed”
1.) Negative skewness (shown above) means the distribution is shifted toward the surface,
possibly due to back scattering: Common for light elements at high energy
2.) Positive skewness means the distribution is shifted away from the surface, possibly due to
channeling (will discuss shortly): Common for heavy elements at low energy
Asymmetry is usually expressed in terms of the skewness moment
𝑚1
Range: 𝑅 𝑝=
𝑄𝑇
Std. Dev:
√
𝜎 𝑃 =∆ 𝑅 𝑃 =
𝑚2
𝑄𝑇
𝑚3
Skewness:𝛾 = 3
𝑄𝑇 ∆ 𝑅 𝑃
𝑚4
Kurtosis: 𝛽= 4
𝑄𝑇 ∆ 𝑅𝑃
Channeling and tailing
• The above theory is fine for amorphous target
• If ions hit along major crystal orientation --> channeling results
• ion moves further through lattice
• Range depends on crystal axis, beam to crystal alignment, dose (damage along channel)
Channeling does not occur if there is significant implant damage that turns the implanted
layer into an amorphous one. Heavy ions like P31 and As75 at large doses do not show
channeling.
Light ions and/or low dose implants are prone to channeling. In such instances,
channeling can be prevented by:
• Tilting and twisting the wafer to close crystal openness as seen by ion beam
• Implanting through a thin amorphous layer (e.g oxide)
• Implanting heavy, but electrically inactive species like Si or Ar prior to actual dopant implant.
The pre-implant turns the wafer surface into an amorphous layer
Preventing channeling
How thick mask is needed?
In order to act as an efficient mask, the thickness of Mask Si
the mask should be large enough that the tail of
the implant profile in the silicon should not
significantly alter the doping concentration (CB).
C * ( xm ) C P* exp
xm R *
P
C
2
2 B
2R *P
(“*” means for value in the mask layer)
C P*
Mask thickness xm xm RP* RP* 2 ln RP* mRP*
CB
2
Q
*
1 x RP Q xm RP*
Dose penetrating the mask: QP 2 R * exp 2 R * dx 2 erfc 2 R *
p p
p xm
Rule of thumb: good masking thickness
Xm = Rp + 4.3Rp, C(x=Xm)/C(x=Rp) 10-4.
[ ] 𝑑𝑥= 𝑄 𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑐
[√ ]
∗ 2
1 𝑥− 𝑅 𝑝
𝑄
∞ − 𝑥𝑚 − 𝑅 𝑝∗
∗∫
2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝 ∗
𝑇𝑜 𝑠h𝑜𝑤 𝑄 𝑃 = 𝑒
√2 𝜋 ∆ 𝑅𝑝 𝑥 𝑚
2 2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝 ∗
∞
2
∫
2
−𝑧
𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙 ( 𝑑𝑒𝑓 ) ; erfc 𝑢= 𝑒 𝑑𝑧 … … … … (1)
√𝜋 𝑢
[ ] 𝑑𝑥
∗ 2
∞ 1 𝑥 − 𝑅𝑝
𝑄 −
∗∫
2 ∗
∆ 𝑅𝑝
𝑄𝑃 = 𝑒
√2 𝜋 ∆ 𝑅 𝑝 𝑥 𝑚
[ ]
∗
1 𝑥−𝑅 𝑝
𝑡h𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑥=√ 2∆ 𝑅𝑝 𝑑𝑧
𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑧 = ∗
√ 2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝∗
∗
𝑥 −𝑅𝑝
𝑧= 𝑚 𝑤h𝑒𝑛 𝑥 → ∞ ; 𝑡h𝑒𝑛𝑧 → ∞
√2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝∗
[ ]
∞ ∞
𝑄 𝑄 2
∫ ∫
2 2
𝑇h𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 , 𝑄 𝑃 = 𝑒 −𝑧
√ 2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝 𝑑 𝑧 = ∗ −𝑧
𝑒 𝑑𝑧
√ 2 𝜋 ∆ 𝑅 𝑝∗ 2 √𝜋
[ ] [ ]
∗ ∗
1 𝑥 − 𝑅𝑝 1 𝑥𝑚− 𝑅 𝑝
√2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝
∗
√2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝
∗
[ ]
∗
𝑄 𝑥𝑚 − 𝑅 𝑝
𝑄 𝑃 = 𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑐
2 √2 ∆ 𝑅𝑝 ∗
Preventing channeling
Preventing channeling
Lateral scattering