OM CH 2 Global Operations
OM CH 2 Global Operations
OM CH 2 Global Operations
a Global Environment 2
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer, Render, Munson
Operations Management, Twelfth Edition
Principles of Operations Management, Tenth Edition
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2
Benefit to
Society
Functional Area
Missions
Finance/
Marketing Operations Accounting
Figure 2.3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 20
Strategy
► Action plan to achieve mission
► Functional areas have
strategies
► Strategies exploit
opportunities and strengths,
neutralize threats, and avoid
weaknesses
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 21
Strategies for Competitive
Advantage
Firms achieve mission in three conceptual ways
1. Differentiation – better, or at
least different
2. Cost leadership – cheaper
3. Response – more responsive
OM managers are called on to deliver goods and
services that are :
a)better, or at least different
b)Cheaper.
c)More
Copyright © 2017responsive
Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 22
Each of the three strategies provides
an opportunity for operations
managers competitive advantage
competitive advantage : The
creation of a unique advantage
over competitors
Figure 2.5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 32
Product Life Cycle
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Product design Forecasting critical Standardization Little product
and development Fewer rapid differentiation
Product and
critical product changes, Cost
process reliability
Frequent product more minor minimization
Competitive
and process changes
Strategy/Issues
product Overcapacity in
OMStrategy/Issues
runs
Product
improvement and
cost cutting
Figure 2.5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 33
SWOT Analysis
Mission
Internal External
Strengths Opportunities
Analysis
Internal External
Weaknesses Threats
Strategy
Form a Strategy
Build a competitive advantage, such as low price, design, or volume
flexibility, quality, quick delivery, after-sale service, broad product
lines.
Figure 2.6
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 - 35
Theory of Comparative
Advantage
▶ If an external provider can perform
activities more productively than the
purchasing firm, then the external
provider should do the work
▶ Purchasing firm focuses on core
competencies
▶ Drives outsourcing
Score for BIM = (.2 * 3) + (.2 * 4) + (.2 * 5) + (.1 * 4) + (.1 * 5) + (.1 * 4) + (.1 * 2) = 3.9
b ) Garza decides to increase the weights for quality, delivery, and cost to 10, 6,
and 4, respectively. How does this change your conclusions? Why?