Lecture# 06

Compiler Construction
A Simple Syntax-Directed Translator,
(Part-II)

by Abdul Rehman

Topics
• Syntax-Directed Translation (Postfix Notation, Synthesized Attributes, Inherited Attributes
• Translation, Infix to postfix Translation, Attributed Grammars, Depth-First Traversals, SDD
• Translation Schemes, SDT Questions/Tasks)
 Overview
• This chapter contains introductory material
• Building a simple compiler
– Syntax Definition
– Syntax-Directed Translation
– Parsing
– A Translator for Simple Expressions
– The Lexical Analyzer

2
Syntax Directed Translation (SDT)
Grammar + Semantic Rule = SDT

Informal Notations

3
Syntax Directed Translation (SDT)
Grammar + Semantic Rule = SDT

Informal Notations

4
 Syntax Directed Translation (SDT)

SDT uses a CFG to specify the syntactic structure of the language &
associates a set of attributes with (non)terminals.
Further, with each production, associates a set of semantic rules for
computing values for the attributes.
The attributes contain the translated form of the input after
the
computations are completed.
In SDT, every non-terminal can get 0 or more attributes.
In semantic rule, attribute can be a value (string, memory
5
location, number, etc.)
 Syntax for Statements
stmt  id:= expr
|if expr then stmt
|if expr then stmt else stmt
|while expr do stmt
|begin opt_stmts end

Ambiguous Grammar?

6
 Syntax-Directed Translation
• Associate Attributes With Grammar Rules and Translate as
Parsing occurs
• The translation will follow the parse tree structure (and as a
result the structure and form of the parse tree will affect the
translation).
• First example: Inductive Translation.
• Infix to Postfix Notation Translation for Expressions
– Translation defined inductively as: Postfix(E) where E is an
Expression.
Rules
1. If E is a variable or constant then Postfix(E) = E
2. If E is E1 op E2 then Postfix(E)
= Postfix(E1 op E2) = Postfix(E1) Postfix(E2) op
3. If E is (E1) then Postfix(E) = Postfix(E1)
7
 Examples
Postfix( ( 9 – 5 ) + 2 )
= Postfix( ( 9 – 5 ) ) Postfix( 2 ) +
= Postfix( 9 – 5 ) Postfix( 2 ) +
= Postfix( 9 ) Postfix( 5 ) - Postfix( 2 ) +
=95–2+

Postfix(9 – ( 5 + 2 ) )
= Postfix( 9 ) Postfix( ( 5 + 2 ) ) -
= Postfix( 9 ) Postfix( 5 + 2 ) –
= Postfix( 9 ) Postfix( 5 ) Postfix( 2 ) + –
=952+–

8
 Synthesized and Inherited Attributes
• An attribute is said to be …
– synthesized if its value at a parse-tree node is
determined from the attribute values at the
children of the node
– inherited its value at a parse-tree node
if is by the parent
determined
parent’s semantic rules) & (by
its siblings
enforcing the

Synthesized

Inherited
9
 Attributed Grammar
(SDD for infix to postfix translation)
Syntax Directed Definition

Infix: 9-5+2 & Postfix: 95-2+

Production Semantic Rule
expr  expr1 + term expr.t := expr1.t // term.t //
expr  expr1 - term “+” expr.t := expr1.t //
expr  term term.t // “-” expr.t := term.t
term  0 term.t := “0”
term  1 term.t := “1”
… …
term  9 term.t := “9”
Note: expr and expr1 are same. // is concatenation, t is
used for string valued
10
 Infix: 9- & Postfix: 95-2+ Example Annotated
5+2 Semantic Rule Parse Tree Continued
Production
expr  expr1 + term expr.t := expr1.t // term.t //
expr  expr1 - term “+” expr.t := expr1.t //
expr  term term.t // “-” expr.t := term.t
term  0 term.t := “0”
term  1 term.t := “1” Just in this Evaluation of the
… … value
term  9 term.t := “9”
expr.t = 95-
2+
expr
expr.t = 95- term.t =
2
expr1 term
expr.t = 9 term.t =
expr1 term 5

term term.t = 9
+ 2
9 - 11
9 - 5 + 2
 Depth-First Traversals
procedure visit(n : node);
begin
for each child m of n, from left to right do
visit(m);
evaluate semantic rules at node n
end

Note:
Synthesized attributes are evaluated after visiting and
Inherited attributes are evaluated at first occurrence
 Depth-First Traversals (Example)
Semantic Rule
expr.t := expr1.t // term.t // expr.t = 95-
“+” expr.t := expr1.t //
2+
term.t // “-” expr.t := term.t
term.t := “0” expr.t = 95- term.t =
term.t := “1” 2
… expr.t = 9 term.t =
term.t := “9” 5

term.t = 9
+ 2
9 -
5 Note: all attributes are
of the synthesized type
 Translation Schemes
• A translation scheme is a CF grammar
embedded with semantic actions

rest  + term { print(“+”) } rest

Embedded
semantic action
rest

Sematic rules ky against kon sa

action perform hota ha osy hm TS + term rest
my dykhtay hen { print(“+”) }
 Example Translation Scheme
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix

expr  expr + term { print(“+”) }

expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term  0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
… …
term  9 { print(“9”) }
 Example Translation Scheme (cont’d)
expr { print(“+”) }
expr + term
{ print(“2”) }
{ print(“-”)}
- 2
expr term
{ print(“5”) }
term 5
{ print(“9”) }
9
Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term

Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term
{ print(“-”)}
- term
expr

Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term
{ print(“-”)}
- term
expr

term
{ print(“9”) }
9
Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term
{ print(“-”)}
- term
expr
{ print(“5”) }
term 5
{ print(“9”) }
9
Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term
{ print(“2”) }
{ print(“-”)}
- 2
expr term
{ print(“5”) }
term 5
{ print(“9”) }
9
Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
Translation scheme is used to translate infix to postfix Example Translation Scheme
expr  expr + term{ print(“+”) } (cont’d)
expr  expr - term { print(“-”) }
expr  term
term 0 { print(“0”) }
term  1 { print(“1”) }
…
expr { print(“+”) }
…
term  9 { print(“9”) }
expr + term
{ print(“2”) }
{ print(“-”)}
- 2
expr term
{ print(“5”) }
term 5
{ print(“9”) }
9
Translates 9-5+2 into postfix 95-2+

The implementation of a translation scheme ensures that semantic actions

are performed in the order they would appear during a postorder traversal of
a parse tree
 SDT Question-1
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that
translates arithmetic expressions from infix notation
into prefix notation in which an operator appears
before its operands; e.g. , -xy is the prefix notation
for x - y. Give annotated parse trees for the inputs 9-
5+2 and 9-5*2.
 SDT Solution-1
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that translates
arithmetic expressions from infix notation into prefix notation
in which an operator appears before its operands; e.g. , -xy is
the prefix notation for x - y. Give annotated parse trees for the
inputs 9-5+2 and 9-5*2.
Productions Translation Schemes
expr -> expr + term expr -> {print("+")} expr + term
| expr - term | {print("-")} expr - term
| term | term
term -> term * term -> {print("*")} term * factor
factor | {print("/")} term / factor
| term / | factor
factor factor -> digit {print(digit)}
| factor | (expr)
factor -> digit |
(expr)
NOTE: Construct annotated parse trees for the inputs 9-5+2 and 9-5*2 by yourself
 SDT Question-2
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that
translates arithmetic expressions from postfix
notation into infix notation. Give annotated parse
trees for the inputs 95-2 and 952-.
 SDT Solution-2
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that
translates arithmetic expressions from postfix
notation into infix notation. Give annotated parse
trees for the inputs 95-2 and 952-.
Productions Translation Schemes
expr -> expr expr + expr -> expr {print("+")} expr +
| expr expr – | expr {print("-")} expr –
| expr expr * | {print("(")} expr
| expr expr / {print(")*(")} expr
| digit {print(")")} *
| {print("(")} expr
{print(")/(")} expr
{print(")")} /
| digit {print(digit)}

NOTE: Construct annotated parse trees for the inputs 9-5+2 and 9-5*2 by yourself
 SDT Question-3
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that
translates arithmetic expression from postfix
notation into equivalent prefix notation.
 SDT Questions-3
• Construct a syntax-directed translation scheme that
translates arithmetic expression from postfix
notation into equivalent prefix notation.

Productions Translation Schemes

expr -> expr expr op expr -> {print(op)} expr expr op
| digit | digit {print(digit)}
The
End