St.

PETER’S
ENGINEERING COLLEGE (For CSE, ECE & EEE)
Giving Wings to Thoughts (Sponsored by Shantha Educational Society)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Affiliated to JNTUH)

Course Name (C---)

Faculty Name
Defining Course Outcomes :-
Course Bloom’s
Outcom Course Outcome Statement Taxonom
e y level
C---.1

C---.2

C---.3

C---.4

C---.5
C---.6
PO’s and PSO’s :-
1. ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science,
engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex
engineering problems.
2. PROBLEM ANALYSIS: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT OF SOLUTIONS: Design solutions for complex
engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified
needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
4. CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPLEX PROBLEMS: Use research-based
knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. MODERN TOOL USAGE: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources,
and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. THE ENGINEER AND SOCIETY: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual
knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice
7. ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: Understand the impact of the professional
engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and
need for sustainable development.
8. ETHICS: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the engineering practice.
9. INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM WORK: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
10. COMMUNICATION: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective
reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, give and receive clear instructions.
11. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a
team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
12. LIFE-LONG LEARNING: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Program specific outcomes
PSO1: Ability to use electronic modern IT tools (both hardware& software) for the design
and analysis of complex electronic systems for additional research activities.
PSO2: Should be able to clearly understand the concepts and applications in the field of
communication/networking, signal processing, embedded systems and semiconductor
technology for excellent adaptability, good interpersonal skills with professional ethics and
social responsibilities.
 CO Mapping :-
PO/CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

C224.1

C224.2

C224.3

C224.4

C224.5

C224.6

C224

Correlation Levels: 1-Low, 2-Medium, 3-High

Justification :-
Be able to explain different number systems, signed numbers, Knowledge
C224.1
floating point representation

PO/CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

C---.1

Justifications
PO???

PO???

PO???
Curricular Gaps & Corrective
measures:
C---.x

• GAP : “Gap description here”

Corrective Measure: plan of action to overcome the gap.

CO-PO mapping considering the curricular gaps

C---.x
TEACHING METHODS
Pedagog PO
Topic in the Lesson plan y used

1
2

5
6
TEACHING METHOD:-
C---.x Expert webinar
and PPT

Method :- PPT for Lecture

Reason :- For understanding

the complete interconnection
Logic by using basic ROM
Architecture.

By Dr. Thomas Kaminsky &

Dr. Charles Kime
(users.ece.utexas.edu)
TEACHING METHODS
C---.x Expert webinar
and PPT
C--.x NPTEL videos

• Web References NPTEL Video Link

1) • http://
2)
3)
Student self-Learning support
• Lecture Notes available at Link :
• E-books available at NDL for this course at:
• Course Link at SWAYAM:
 MOOCs links
Non-Profit (Free)
• edX:
CO ATTAINMENT:-
Chalk & talk
C224.1

• Internal Questions:-

S.No QUESTION Max CO Taxonomy

Marks Number Level
1

2
 Chalk & talk
C224.1

• Assignment Question :-

S.No QUESTION Max CO Taxonomy

Marks Number Level

2
 Chalk & talk
C224.1

• University Question:-
S.No QUESTION Max CO Taxonomy
Marks Number Level
1

4
 CO ATTAINMENT:
1) Internal Exams:
ST.PETER'S ENGINEERING COLLEGE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Course Assessment (Internal Exam -1)
FACULTY NAME: P.RAMYA 2016-17
Course Name: STLD Date:
CLASS III CSE B.Tech Mid - I Marks
QUESTION NUMBER (MARKS)
Objective
NAME OF THE STUDENT 1 2 3 4 Assignment
SL.No REG.NO
TOTAL
Max Marks 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 25.0

Total

Average % Mark

No. of students attempted

No of Absents: 3 No of Presents: 135
CO Attainment: INTERNAL EXAM
CO Mapping with Internal Exam Questions:
C224.1 Y Y Y
C224.2 Y Y
C224.3 Y Y Y
C224.4
C224.5
C224.6

CO Mapping with Internal Exam Questions:

Percentage Students Scored more than Target % 100% 95% 97% 96% 47% 100%
CO Attainment Level 3 3 3 3 1 3 Average
50% Level 1 C224.1 3 3 3 3
70% Level 2 C224.2 3 3 3
>70% Level 3 C224.3 3 3 3 3
C224.4
C224.5
C224.6
3
CO ATTAINMENT:
2) University Exam:
ST.PETER'S ENGINEERING COLLEGE
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
Course Assessment (University Exam)
FACULTY NAME: P.RAMYA 2016-17
Course Name : STLD Date:
CLASS II ECE 50%
Students
SL.No REG.NO
NAME OF THE STUDENT >Target%
TOTAL Marks
Max Marks 75.00 37.50
8 15BK1A0406 17 0
9 15BK1A0407 41 1

Course Name : STLD

Percentage of Students Scored more than 50% 23%

Attainment Level 1
Attainment Level
1 50%
2 70%
3 >70%
 CO ASSESSMENT:
ST.PETERs ENGINEERING COLLEGE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
COURSE OUTCOME ASSESSMENT
FACULTY NAME: P.RAMYA Academic Year: 2016-17
SUBJECT : STLD
CLASS II ECE, I-SEM
Mid 1 Mid 2 Univ
Student be able to explain different number systems, Signed numbers,
3 1
C224.1 Floating point Representations
Be able to illustrate the functioning of basic logic gates and
3 1
C224.2 NAND/NOR Realizations
Be able to solve simple boolean expressions using Boolean alzebra
3 1
C224.3 postulates to minimize combinational functions
able to select standard combination al & sequential building blocks to
2 1
C224.4 design complex circuits
Able to differentiate RAM & ROM and Designing of PROM 1 1
C224.5
Able to Evaluate State Diagrams with the knowledge of Mealy &
3 1
C224.6 Moore Circuits

Attainment Level of Course Outcomes Overall

C224.1 2
C224.2 2
C224.3 2
C224.4 2 Attainment Level
C224.5 1 1 50%

C224.6 2 2 70%
Average 2 3 >70%
Overall Attainment Level 2
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES:
3) Student Feedback :-
SWITCHING THEORY AND  Be able to explain different number systems, signed numbers, floating
1 LOGIC DESIGN point representation
 Be able to illustrate the functioning of basic logic gates and multilevel
NAND/NOR realization.
 Be able to solve simple Boolean expressions using the theorems and
postulates of Boolean algebra and to minimize combinational functions
 Be able to select standard combinational and sequential building blocks to
design complex circuits.
 Be able to differentiate RAM & ROM memories and designing of PROM.
 Able to evaluate state diagrams with the knowledge of Mealy and Moore
circuits and algorithmic state machines

SPECIFIC LEARNING OUTCOMES – SWITCHING THEORY AND LOGIC DESIGN

C224.1 3.00
C224.2 2.25
C224.3 2.75
C224.4 1.66
C224.5 1.50
C224.6 1.25

Excellent(E) Satisfactory(S) Need improvement(I)

3 2 1
Improvements:
Target Attainment Attainment Status
C224.1
C224.2
C224.3
C224.4
C224.5
C224.6
C224

“Poor Internal Attainment”

Reason:…..........

Improvement Measure:.
 Conducting ….....
 Practicing …....
 Revision on ….....